Predicting Gastric Neoplasia in Patients with High-risk Endoscopic Features

February 28, 2025 updated by: Zhijun Bao, Fudan University

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Predicting Gastric Neoplasia in Patients with High-risk Endoscopic Features: a Prospective Cohort Study

A prospective, single-center, cohort study to development and validation of a prediction model for predicting gastric neoplasia in patients with high-risk endoscopic features

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Patients at high risk for gastric cancer are undergone screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy at the Endoscopy department of Gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Huadong hospital affiliated to Fudan University.
  2. For every enrolled patient, follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy were conducted in the 3rd and 5th years after the baseline examination. If high-risk endoscopic features for gastric cancer (i.e., active Helicobacter pylori infection or atrophic gastritis classified as C2-O3 according to the Kimura-Takemoto classification) were observed during the baseline examination, an additional follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in the 1st year after the baseline examination.
  3. Clinical characteristics, gastric neoplasia-related blood biomarkers, the extent of atrophic gastritis and other endoscopic findings were collected in baseline and follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy. For patients whose baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy indicates open-type atrophic gastritis (Kimura-Takemoto classification O1-O3), blood samples will be collected for whole-genome sequencing at the time of the baseline and the final follow-up examination.
  4. Enrolled patients were followed up until gastric neoplasia was detected, up to a maximum of 5 years.
  5. After the study was completed, a prediction model for predicting gastric neoplasia in patients with atrophic gastritis was developed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2700

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Danian Ji, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +86-18019094606
  • Email: arctg4@163.com

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Huadong Hospital affiliated to Fudan University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals with high-risk endoscopic features

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 45 years
  2. Meets the definition of a high-risk population for gastric cancer, which includes one or more of the following: (1) Residence in a high-incidence region for gastric cancer (2) Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection (3) History of chronic atrophic gastritis, gastric ulcer, gastric polyps, post-gastrectomy status, hypertrophic gastritis, pernicious anemia, or other precancerous gastric conditions (4) First-degree relatives of patients with gastric cancer (5) Other risk factors for gastric cancer such as high salt intake, frequent consumption of pickled foods, smoking, or heavy alcohol use
  3. No gastric cancer or precancerous lesions detected on initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy, yet with endoscopic features consistent with high-risk endoscopic features. High-risk endoscopic include: (1) Active Helicobacter pylori infection (2) Atrophic gastritis (Kimura-Takemoto classification C1-O3)
  4. Provision of written informed consent and agreement to comply with the follow-up requirements specified in the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Emergency esophagogastroduodenoscopy
  2. History of partial or total gastrectomy
  3. ASA physical status classification of 3 or higher
  4. Use of oral antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications, or coagulopathy (defined as a platelet count < 50 × 10^9/L or INR > 1.5)
  5. Pregnancy or lactation
  6. Severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal disease
  7. Concomitant other malignant tumors or severe infectious diseases
  8. Refusal to sign the informed consent form or any other condition deemed unsuitable for study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
High-risk endoscopic features
Patients found active Helicobacter pylori infection or atrophic gastritis in initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Other: No Intervention: Observational Cohort
No Intervention: Observational Cohort

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of gastric neoplasia
Time Frame: 2 weeks after the last follow-up
Detection rate of gastric neoplasia during follow-up. Gastric neoplasia was defined as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma.
2 weeks after the last follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fudan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 28, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024K339-F251

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected IPD

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after completion of this study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All researchers can require the original data from principal investigator of this study (Email address: arctg4@163.com)

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings