Use of Vibration Anesthesia Device in Intratympanic Injections
Evaluation of Different Anesthesia Methods to Reduce Pain From Intratympanic Injections: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
VAN, Turkey, 65000
- van yuzuncu yil university, Bardakçı, Yüzüncü Yıl Ünv., 65080 Tuşba/Van
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18-70 years with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of otologic surgery,
- Recent ototoxic drug use,
- Congenital inner ear malformation,
- History of chemoradiotherapy due to malignant neoplasia,
- Presence of acute or chronic otitis media,
- Age under 18 years, over 70 years
- History of local anesthesia allergy,
- Coagulation abnormality,
- Pregnant and lactating women,
- Hearing cases with other neurootological diseases
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
After each ITS, pain assessment was performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scales (NRS), and Verbal Rating Scales (VRS)
|
In conclusion, induction of anesthesia with VAD in patients treated with ITS provided pain palliation in a similar way to other local anesthetic techniques.
Moreover, the advantage of VAD application over other anesthetic agents was that it eliminated the need to use local anesthetics that may disrupt wound healing.
In addition, inducing anesthesia with VAD can be considered as an alternative method in patients allergic to drugs.
Our study will shed light on different techniques such as the application of ventilation tube in anesthesia with VAD.
|
|
Active Comparator: 2.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
|
Active Comparator: 3.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 4.group
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
Prior to each ITS, all the four methods including local anesthetic cream (EMLA® cream, AstraZeneca PLC), lidocaine spray (Vemcain® Spray), VAD (Blaine®, Blaine Labs, Santa Fe, USA), and saline drops (control) were administered in each patient.
The order of administration was determined for each patient using the randomization software (random.org/lists/).
For the fifth ITS, however, the method of administration was selected by the patient.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
|
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
the visual analog scale (VAS) scaled between 0-10,were used.
|
56 weeks
|
|
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale(NRS-11)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
|
Eleven-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11).
the numerical rating scale (NRS) scaled between 0-10 were used.
|
56 weeks
|
|
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale(VRS-4)
Time Frame: 56 weeks
|
Four-Category Verbal Rating Scale (VRS-4).
the verbal rating scale (VRS) scaled between 0-4 were used.
|
56 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases
- Sensation Disorders
- Ear Diseases
- Hearing Disorders
- Hearing Loss
- Deafness
- Hearing Loss, Sudden
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Lidocaine
- Anesthetics
- Anesthetics, Local
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Desicion No:03 Date:17.06.2020
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.