Robotic Knee Orthosis-assisted Walking in CP

June 16, 2026 updated by: David Scher, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

A Pilot Study to Examine the Effect of a Powered Knee Orthosis on Crouch Gait in Cerebral Palsy

Robotic exoskeletons are becoming increasingly accepted to provide upright mobility in individuals with neurological disorders. These devices can assist in overcoming gravitational forces and reduce energy consumption. Agilik is one such device intended for individuals with neurological disorders. However, Agilik is relatively new, and its efficacy in individuals with CP is unknown. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effectiveness of Agilik as an assistive device for individuals with CP and crouch gait. In this pilot study, ten individuals with CP, GMFCS levels I and II, and crouch gait will walk with Agilik under the supervision of a physical therapist. Assessments of walking with shoes or AFO and Agilik will evaluate the efficacy of the device. The pilot study will assess if Agilik decreases crouch and improves gait characteristics in individuals with CP.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Robotic knee orthosis (RKO) can assist with voluntary knee extension and potentially reduce crouch/flexed-knee gait, but the effectiveness of this technology in individuals with CP is unknown. This study aims to assess the efficacy of Agilik as an assistive device for individuals with CP. Ten individuals with CP, ages 8 to 65 years, and at GMFCS levels I and II, will be recruited for this pilot study. Each individual will participate in a maximum of four sessions/ visits. The first three sessions will include RKO device fitting and tuning, followed by RKO-assisted walking practice to help with device acclimation. These sessions will last up to 60 minutes. A two-minute walk test (2MWT) will also be conducted at the first visit, which will serve as a reference to assess any shift in endurance from device-tuning/ practice. The final visit will include 2MWT and 3D motion capture in shod (shoes or shoes+AFO) and RKO-assisted (shoes+RKO or shoes+AFO+RKO) conditions, and may take up to 3 to 4 hours.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: David M Scher, MD
  • Phone Number: 212 606-1253
  • Email: scherd@hss.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Vishnu Deep Chandran, PhD
  • Phone Number: 212-606-1215
  • Email: chandranv@hss.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy at GMFCS levels I and II
  • Exhibits crouch gait
  • Between 8 to 65 years of age
  • Hip flexion contracture less than 10 degrees
  • Knee flexion contracture less than 20 degrees when measured in prone with hips extended
  • Thigh-foot angle is between 15 degrees (internal) to 30 degrees (external) in prone
  • Can walk a minimum distance of 10 meters without stopping

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No other neurological, musculoskeletal, or cardiorespiratory health conditions or injuries
  • The presence of any cognitive impairment that could limit the ability to understand, follow simple directions, and inform when in pain
  • Inability to participate in the study because of recent orthopedic surgery (within twelve months)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Effect of a powered knee orthosis in individuals with Cerebral Palsy and Flexed-knee Gait
Device: RKO-assisted walking in individuals with CP
The investigators will assess walking in each of the following conditions: shod (shoes or shoes+AFO) and RKO-assisted (shoes+RKO or shoes+AFO+RKO), to achieve the following: (1) Evaluate the effect of RKO, compared to shod upon endurance in individuals with CP at GMFCS levels I and II, and (2) Evaluate the effect of RKO, compared to shod, upon temporal-spatial parameters, lower limb sagittal joint kinematics, and muscle EMG in individuals with CP at GMFCS levels I and II.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance from 2MWT
Time Frame: From enrollment until data collection is performed on the fourth study session.
The distance covered by participants during a two-minute walking test (2MWT) will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
From enrollment until data collection is performed on the fourth study session.
Step length
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Mean step length (distance between the two feet measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of the contralateral foot while both feet are on the ground) during walking will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Single limb support time
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Mean single limb support time (duration just one foot by itself is on the ground) during walking will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Walking speed
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Mean walking speed during walking will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Lower limb joint kinematics
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
The sagittal plane lower limb joint angles (degrees) during walking will be compared to evaluate the difference between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Binary indicator of improvement in walking distance with RKO use
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
"Yes" if the walking distance in the RKO-assisted condition was greater than shod, and "No" if there was no improvement.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Lower limb electromyography data
Time Frame: At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.
Electromyography (EMG) amplitude and duration of lower limb anti-gravity muscles (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, medial gastrocnemius, soleus, and gluteus maximus) will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions. The EMG data will be filtered and rectified to compute linear envelopes. From these envelopes, the average value of EMG amplitude and duration will be compared between RKO-assisted and shod conditions.
At the end of the study visit for each participant, data collection will be performed during the fourth study session from enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 25, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 25, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2023-2299

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study results (de-identified) will be disseminated in conference abstracts and peer-reviewed journal articles.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 12 months of the trial completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data and supporting information will be shared upon reasonable request to the PI. After the PI reviews and approves the applicant's request, de-identified information will be provided.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings