Corkscrew Technique: A Novel Modification in Transurethral Resection of Large Prostate (60-100 g) Optimizing Resection Efficacy and Safety: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still the gold standard for surgical management of enlarged prostate. However, many techniques and minimally invasive procedures are now in the comparative track with Bipolar resection as Laser enucleation.
Multiple drawbacks of Classic TURP problems related to large prostate management as the retreatment after Bipolar resection, another issue that prolonged operative time, Loss of orientation during resection due to rotation of one of the 2 kissing lobe, Bleeding of the 1st lobe resection side make the 2nd lobe resection harder and lengthier, Median lobe resection or bladder neck resection is done at last to avoid sub-trigonal injury. however, due to median lobe obstruction, irrigation is poor during all the resection. length of learning curve, the modification of early median lobe resection carry the risk of sub-trigonal injury.
So, this study is a trial to analyze the effect of new technique in resection of large prostate with good orientation and less time of operation.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ammar Alorabi
- Phone Number: +201067608011
- Email: ammar.alorabi95@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Menoufia
-
Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt, 32511
- Menoufia Faculty of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- BPH causing LUTS with prostate volume between 60 and 100 ml (either by TRUS or CT).
- PSA level below 4 ng/ml.
- IPSS score of 10 and above.
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous history of prostatic biopsy.
- previous history of acute urinary retention.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: Nesbit technique group
patients of this group undergo the classical Nesbit technique.
|
it is composed of development of trough at the right prostatic lobe (at 10 o'clock) from the bladder neck proximally down to a level just above the external urethral sphincter distally, then deepening the trough until the prostatic capsule, performing haemostasias then resection of lateral lobes in halves, upper right, lower right, upper left and at last lower left respectively with haemostasias in-between.
Then resection of the median lobe if present.
Final haemostasias then ensues before insertion of the triple way catheter with normal saline irrigation.
|
|
Active Comparator: Corkscrew technique
patients of this group undergo the novel modified technique.
|
the Corkscrew technique was performed by resection starting at 3 o'clock and carried on in a clockwise manner till 3 o'clock again.
Prostate was resected from bladder neck downwards to the verumontanum after dividing the gland, imaginary, into 3 zones or thirds, proximal, middle and distal zone.
The gland was resected zone by zone in this corkscrew manner.
Once the proximal third is resected and hemostasis done, the middle third resection is done in the same manner, The process is repeated for the distal third.
Hemostasis was performed instantly.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Weight of resected tissue
Time Frame: within one hour postoperatively
|
The weight of resected tissue measured in grams using laboratory scale device.
|
within one hour postoperatively
|
|
Resection time
Time Frame: the operative time
|
Resection time measured in minutes by documenting the time of resection start and time of resection end.
|
the operative time
|
|
Complication rate
Time Frame: the operative time
|
Complication rate is measured by number of complications occurred.
|
the operative time
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Qmax
Time Frame: One month postoperatively
|
The change in IPSS score is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative Qmax.
Qmax (maximum flow rate) is measured using uroflowmetry and measured by ml/sec.
|
One month postoperatively
|
|
Change in postvoid residual volume
Time Frame: One month postoperatively
|
The change in postvoid residual volume is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative postvoid residual volume.
postvoid residual volume is assessed using pelviabdominal ultrasound and measured by centimeter cubic.
|
One month postoperatively
|
|
Change in hemoglobin level
Time Frame: One day postoperatively
|
The change in hemoglobin is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin level.
Hemoglobin level is assessed using Complete Blood Count and measured by g/dl.
|
One day postoperatively
|
|
Change in International Prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Time Frame: one month postoperatively
|
The change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative IPSS.
IPSS is measured by IPSS scoring system in form of numbers, where minimum score is 0 representing no symptoms and maximum score is 35 representing the most sever symptoms.
|
one month postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Corkscrew technique
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.