Corkscrew Technique: A Novel Modification in Transurethral Resection of Large Prostate (60-100 g) Optimizing Resection Efficacy and Safety: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

May 17, 2025 updated by: Ammar Fathi Mohamed AlOrabi, Menoufia University

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is still the gold standard for surgical management of enlarged prostate. However, many techniques and minimally invasive procedures are now in the comparative track with Bipolar resection as Laser enucleation.

Multiple drawbacks of Classic TURP problems related to large prostate management as the retreatment after Bipolar resection, another issue that prolonged operative time, Loss of orientation during resection due to rotation of one of the 2 kissing lobe, Bleeding of the 1st lobe resection side make the 2nd lobe resection harder and lengthier, Median lobe resection or bladder neck resection is done at last to avoid sub-trigonal injury. however, due to median lobe obstruction, irrigation is poor during all the resection. length of learning curve, the modification of early median lobe resection carry the risk of sub-trigonal injury.

So, this study is a trial to analyze the effect of new technique in resection of large prostate with good orientation and less time of operation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Menoufia
      • Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt, 32511
        • Menoufia Faculty of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BPH causing LUTS with prostate volume between 60 and 100 ml (either by TRUS or CT).
  • PSA level below 4 ng/ml.
  • IPSS score of 10 and above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous history of prostatic biopsy.
  • previous history of acute urinary retention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Nesbit technique group
patients of this group undergo the classical Nesbit technique.
it is composed of development of trough at the right prostatic lobe (at 10 o'clock) from the bladder neck proximally down to a level just above the external urethral sphincter distally, then deepening the trough until the prostatic capsule, performing haemostasias then resection of lateral lobes in halves, upper right, lower right, upper left and at last lower left respectively with haemostasias in-between. Then resection of the median lobe if present. Final haemostasias then ensues before insertion of the triple way catheter with normal saline irrigation.
Active Comparator: Corkscrew technique
patients of this group undergo the novel modified technique.
the Corkscrew technique was performed by resection starting at 3 o'clock and carried on in a clockwise manner till 3 o'clock again. Prostate was resected from bladder neck downwards to the verumontanum after dividing the gland, imaginary, into 3 zones or thirds, proximal, middle and distal zone. The gland was resected zone by zone in this corkscrew manner. Once the proximal third is resected and hemostasis done, the middle third resection is done in the same manner, The process is repeated for the distal third. Hemostasis was performed instantly.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight of resected tissue
Time Frame: within one hour postoperatively
The weight of resected tissue measured in grams using laboratory scale device.
within one hour postoperatively
Resection time
Time Frame: the operative time
Resection time measured in minutes by documenting the time of resection start and time of resection end.
the operative time
Complication rate
Time Frame: the operative time
Complication rate is measured by number of complications occurred.
the operative time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Qmax
Time Frame: One month postoperatively
The change in IPSS score is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative Qmax. Qmax (maximum flow rate) is measured using uroflowmetry and measured by ml/sec.
One month postoperatively
Change in postvoid residual volume
Time Frame: One month postoperatively
The change in postvoid residual volume is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative postvoid residual volume. postvoid residual volume is assessed using pelviabdominal ultrasound and measured by centimeter cubic.
One month postoperatively
Change in hemoglobin level
Time Frame: One day postoperatively
The change in hemoglobin is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin level. Hemoglobin level is assessed using Complete Blood Count and measured by g/dl.
One day postoperatively
Change in International Prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Time Frame: one month postoperatively
The change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is measured by difference between preoperative and postoperative IPSS. IPSS is measured by IPSS scoring system in form of numbers, where minimum score is 0 representing no symptoms and maximum score is 35 representing the most sever symptoms.
one month postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Corkscrew technique

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.