Using LUminoMark vs Coventional Practice for Targeted Axillary Surgery (LUCAS)
A Comparative Study to Evaluate Targeting Methods for Axillary Surgery in Patients With Clinically Node-positive Breast Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Jeeyeon Lee, Associate professor in Kyungpook National University, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 82-53-200-2707
- Email: j.lee@knu.ac.kr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Joon Suk Moon, Clinical assistant professor, MD
- Phone Number: 82-53-200-7281
- Email: joonsukm@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 20 to 70 years
- Women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer through biopsy
- Patients with clinically and imaging-suspected axillary lymph node metastasis, confirmed pathologically (aspiration cytology or needle biopsy)
- Clinically staged T1-T4, N1-3
- Patients who have fully understood the clinical trial content (if possible) and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with inadequate radiological evaluation of the axilla before surgery
- Recurrent breast cancer or inflammatory breast cancer
- Breast cancer with distant metastasis (Stage 4)
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the components of the investigational drug
- Patients scheduled for axillary dissection that does not require targeting of the target lesion
- Patients with active connective tissue disease (e.g., scleroderma, lupus) that has invaded the skin
- Patients with locally advanced breast cancer or inflammatory locally advanced breast cancer that is not amenable to surgery
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to the main component or excipients of the investigational drug
- Female subjects who may become pregnant during the clinical trial period and do not agree to use a highly effective non-hormonal contraception method (e.g., sterilization, intrauterine device, complete abstinence, vasectomy partner) from the time of investigational drug injection until the follow-up visit
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within 12 weeks before enrollment in this clinical trial
- Patients deemed unsuitable for participation by the investigator for any other reason
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: LuminoMarkTM group
LuminoMarkTM using group for targeting of axillary lymph node
|
This group used LuminoMark as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, comparing it to existing methods (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) to assess its safety and effectiveness, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional group
Conventional method using group for targeting of axillary lymph node
|
This group used conventional method (charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided skin marking) as a targeting method for axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with suspected metastasis, with procedural differences based on neoadjuvant chemotherapy status.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of the axillary lymph node targeting method
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
The outcome will be assessed by determining whether the preoperatively marked (targeted) lymph node is successfully identified and retrieved during surgery, and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. Success (match): The retrieved lymph node is matched with targeted lymph node. Failure (not match): The retrieved lymph node is not matched with targeted lymph node. |
From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
|
Comparison the accuracy rate between LuminoMark group and conventional group
Time Frame: At the end of the trial (up to 1 year)
|
Compare the rate at which the lymph nodes are accurately detected using charcoal staining, needle targeting, ultrasound-guided marking, etc., with the rate at which they are detected using LuminoMark.
|
At the end of the trial (up to 1 year)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparion of surgical time between two group
Time Frame: During surgery
|
Comparison of time from skin incision to detection of marked axillary lymph nodes Comparison of total axillary surgical time
|
During surgery
|
|
Comparison of complications between two groups
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
Compare the postoperative complications after surgery
|
From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
|
Adverse drug reactions
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
Compare the incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups
|
From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
|
Concordance rate between sentinel lymph node and targeted lymph node in both group
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
Concordance rate between sentinel lymph node and targeted lymph node in both group
|
From enrollment to the end of observation at 3 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group, Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kim WH, Kim HJ, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Cheon H, Lee SM, Cho SH, Shin KM, Kim GC. Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Non-palpable and Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes with Subsequent Removal after Tattooing: False-Negative Results and Concordance with Sentinel Lymph Nodes. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Nov;43(11):2576-2581. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
- Takemoto N, Koyanagi A, Yasuda M, Yamamoto H. Comparison of the indocyanine green dye method versus the combined method of indigo carmine blue dye with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast conservative therapy for stage </=IIA breast cancer. BMC Womens Health. 2018 Sep 18;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0646-5.
- Lee J, Kang B, Jung JH, Kim HJ, Kim WH, Yang JD, Lee JS, Chae YS, Lee SJ, Lee IH, Park JY, Park NJ, Park HY. Feasibility of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark) for targeting suspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):1588. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13175-9.
- Bang YJ, Choi HJ, Kim I, Lee MH, Lee S, Shin HJ, Nam SJ, Lee JE, Chae BJ, Lee SK, Ryu JM, Kim SW. The efficacy and safety of an indocyanine green-hyaluronic acid mixture (LuminoMark) for localization in patients with non-palpable breast lesions: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel phase 3 clinical trial. Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 24;13:1039670. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1039670. eCollection 2023.
- Kitzman JV, Martin JF, Holley JH, Huber WG. Determination of antipyrine in catfish plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1988 Mar 11;437(1):306-10. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)90399-6. No abstract available.
- Lin J, Lin LS, Chen DR, Lin KJ, Wang YF, Chang YJ. Indocyanine green fluorescence method for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2020 Dec;43(12):1149-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
- White KP, Sinagra D, Dip F, Rosenthal RJ, Mueller EA, Lo Menzo E, Rancati A. Indocyanine green fluorescence versus blue dye, technetium-99M, and the dual-marker combination of technetium-99M + blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early breast cancer-meta-analysis including consistency analysis. Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):963-973. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.021. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
- Bargon CA, Huibers A, Young-Afat DA, Jansen BAM, Borel-Rinkes IHM, Lavalaye J, van Slooten HJ, Verkooijen HM, van Swol CFP, Doeksen A. Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Breast Cancer Patients Through Fluorescent Imaging Using Indocyanine Green: The INFLUENCE Trial. Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):913-920. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005633. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
- Kim WH, Kim HJ, Jung JH, Park HY, Lee J, Kim WW, Park JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ. Ultrasound-Guided Restaging and Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Guidance of Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: Experience with Activated Charcoal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb;25(2):494-500. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6250-3. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
- Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Lee RK, Kim HJ, Kim WH, Park JY, Jeong JY, Chae YS, Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim MY, Yang JD, Lee JW, Lee JS, Park HY. 5-year oncological outcomes of targeted axillary sampling in pT1-2N1 breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):681-687. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- KBCSG 36
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.