Innovating Access to Novel Therapies Through Standardized Prospective Integration of Response Evaluations (IMPACT-INSPIRE) (IMPACT-INSPIRE)

May 11, 2026 updated by: National Cancer Centre, Singapore

This observational study aims to assess the outcomes in patients with advanced treatment refractory cancers with matched molecular/precision therapy as per their molecular profiling results after discussion at molecular tumour board.

  1. To standardize response assessment and data collection for patients that are receiving off-label or non-standard therapies based on MTB recommendations.

    - Establish a standardized response assessment process and data collection patients that are receiving off-label or non-standard therapies based on MTB recommendations.

  2. To demonstrate that it is feasible to standardize investigations and endpoints in this proof-of-concept study.

    • Through standard safety laboratory investigations (FBC, U/E/Cr, LFT)
    • Through standard radiological imaging at 6-12 weeks with the key endpoint being best response during that imaging window, and disease control rate at 6 months.

Hypothesis: Our proposed IMPACT-INSPIRE study hypothesis is that standardised response assessment and data collection in patients with no available therapies receiving off-label systemic therapies, can provide a novel mechanism to assess oncological outcomes in this unique cohort of patients, generate hypothesis, and provide insights to future biomarker-driven drug development

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The patient will be observed clinically after informed consent has been obtained. Patients may require more frequent assessment or additional procedures as clinically necessary or as required by the product label.

  • Each participant will have undergone comprehensive molecular profiling with results discussed at NCCS molecular tumour board. Where necessary, orthogonal studies/assays may be performed.
  • The molecular profiling results will be provided by the referring physician and primary investigator/co-investigator (PI/Co-I). All cases will be presented in the NCCS Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) where there is an adequate quorum of participating members.
  • The MTB will analyse the findings and provide a written report to the treating physician on recommended treatments and/or relevant clinical trials; the treating physician makes all treatment decisions.
  • The subsequent treatments and treatment responses will be tracked longitudinally during the term of this study, thus linking molecularly informed treatments to specific patient outcomes.
  • Translational tissue and plasma may be additionally collected at various timepoints during the study for correlational translational research

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Histologic or cytologic confirmation confirmed of advanced refractory solid tumours with no further suitable treatment options.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is equal to or greater than 21 years of age;
  2. Histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced solid tumours;
  3. Patients who have received and failed all standard anticancer therapy (if available) or are unsuitable for further standard anticancer therapy. Cancers with a poor prognosis or low expected response rate to standard treatment (as judged by the investigator on the basis of available evidence) may be screened with respect to an earlier line of treatment;
  4. Ability to understand and the willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Specific contraindications to exposure to the off-label or non-standard therapy (as defined by the product label);
  2. Other comorbid conditions that may compromise assessing key outcomes or, in the judgement of the clinician, limit the ability of the patient to comply with the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Study population with histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced solid tumours
Histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced treatment refractory solid tumours with no further suitable standard treatment options.
Other: Off-label or non-standard systemic therapies
Off-label systemic treatments and/or relevant clinical trials recommended by the NCCS Molecular Tumour Board (MTB).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best objective response rate at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks.
The percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Up to 12 weeks.
Tumour growth rate inhibition
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks.
Duration that patient is on experimental therapy as a fraction of the total duration on last line of therapy.
Up to 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), Identified and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria.
Time Frame: From the initiation of protocol therapy, up to 30 days after last dose of off-label or non-standard therapy.
From the initiation of protocol therapy, up to 30 days after last dose of off-label or non-standard therapy.
Quality of life thorough AE evaluation or equivalent instruments such as the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline and after every 2 cycles till end of treatment, up to 2 years.
Baseline and after every 2 cycles till end of treatment, up to 2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel SW Tan, BSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCP, PhD, National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 12, 2034

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 12, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024/3309

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings