Innovating Access to Novel Therapies Through Standardized Prospective Integration of Response Evaluations (IMPACT-INSPIRE) (IMPACT-INSPIRE)

May 11, 2026 updated by: National Cancer Centre, Singapore

This observational study aims to assess the outcomes in patients with advanced treatment refractory cancers with matched molecular/precision therapy as per their molecular profiling results after discussion at molecular tumour board.

  1. To standardize response assessment and data collection for patients that are receiving off-label or non-standard therapies based on MTB recommendations.

    - Establish a standardized response assessment process and data collection patients that are receiving off-label or non-standard therapies based on MTB recommendations.

  2. To demonstrate that it is feasible to standardize investigations and endpoints in this proof-of-concept study.

    • Through standard safety laboratory investigations (FBC, U/E/Cr, LFT)
    • Through standard radiological imaging at 6-12 weeks with the key endpoint being best response during that imaging window, and disease control rate at 6 months.

Hypothesis: Our proposed IMPACT-INSPIRE study hypothesis is that standardised response assessment and data collection in patients with no available therapies receiving off-label systemic therapies, can provide a novel mechanism to assess oncological outcomes in this unique cohort of patients, generate hypothesis, and provide insights to future biomarker-driven drug development

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The patient will be observed clinically after informed consent has been obtained. Patients may require more frequent assessment or additional procedures as clinically necessary or as required by the product label.

  • Each participant will have undergone comprehensive molecular profiling with results discussed at NCCS molecular tumour board. Where necessary, orthogonal studies/assays may be performed.
  • The molecular profiling results will be provided by the referring physician and primary investigator/co-investigator (PI/Co-I). All cases will be presented in the NCCS Molecular Tumour Board (MTB) where there is an adequate quorum of participating members.
  • The MTB will analyse the findings and provide a written report to the treating physician on recommended treatments and/or relevant clinical trials; the treating physician makes all treatment decisions.
  • The subsequent treatments and treatment responses will be tracked longitudinally during the term of this study, thus linking molecularly informed treatments to specific patient outcomes.
  • Translational tissue and plasma may be additionally collected at various timepoints during the study for correlational translational research

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Histologic or cytologic confirmation confirmed of advanced refractory solid tumours with no further suitable treatment options.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is equal to or greater than 21 years of age;
  2. Histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced solid tumours;
  3. Patients who have received and failed all standard anticancer therapy (if available) or are unsuitable for further standard anticancer therapy. Cancers with a poor prognosis or low expected response rate to standard treatment (as judged by the investigator on the basis of available evidence) may be screened with respect to an earlier line of treatment;
  4. Ability to understand and the willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Specific contraindications to exposure to the off-label or non-standard therapy (as defined by the product label);
  2. Other comorbid conditions that may compromise assessing key outcomes or, in the judgement of the clinician, limit the ability of the patient to comply with the protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study population with histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced solid tumours
Histologic or cytologic confirmed advanced treatment refractory solid tumours with no further suitable standard treatment options.
Off-label systemic treatments and/or relevant clinical trials recommended by the NCCS Molecular Tumour Board (MTB).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best objective response rate at 12 weeks
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks.
The percentage of participants with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
Up to 12 weeks.
Tumour growth rate inhibition
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks.
Duration that patient is on experimental therapy as a fraction of the total duration on last line of therapy.
Up to 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events (AEs), Identified and graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 criteria.
Time Frame: From the initiation of protocol therapy, up to 30 days after last dose of off-label or non-standard therapy.
From the initiation of protocol therapy, up to 30 days after last dose of off-label or non-standard therapy.
Quality of life thorough AE evaluation or equivalent instruments such as the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.
Time Frame: Baseline and after every 2 cycles till end of treatment, up to 2 years.
Baseline and after every 2 cycles till end of treatment, up to 2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel SW Tan, BSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCP, PhD, National Cancer Centre, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 12, 2034

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 12, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solid Tumor

Clinical Trials on Off-label or non-standard systemic therapies

Subscribe