Use of Corticosteroid in Intraopertive Injections in Total Knee Replacement Surgery. (TKACSI)

August 17, 2026 updated by: Ian P. Marshall, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Adjunctive Use of Corticosteroid in Periarticular Injections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

The goal of this clinical trial is to find out which type of steroid medicine, when added to a standard pain-control injection during total knee replacement surgery, works best at reducing pain, limiting opioid use, and improving recovery in adults undergoing surgery for severe knee arthritis or injury.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does adding a steroid to the injection improve pain control and reduce opioid use after surgery? Is the newer extended-release steroid (Zilretta) more effective and safer-especially for patients with diabetes-than the traditional steroid (methylprednisolone)?

Researchers will compare:

Standard pain-control injection alone Standard injection plus methylprednisolone Standard injection plus Zilretta to see which option provides better pain relief, less opioid use, and improved knee function.

(Patients with diabetes or prediabetes will only be in the standard injection or Zilretta groups so researchers can study whether Zilretta is safer for blood sugar control.)

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to one of the study groups during their total knee replacement surgery Receive the assigned pain-control injection around the knee joint

Be followed after surgery to measure:

Pain levels Opioid pain medication use Knee movement (range of motion) Whether another procedure (such as manipulation under anesthesia) is needed if the knee becomes too stiff Patient-reported outcome surveys about pain and function

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Total knee replacement surgery (also called total knee arthroplasty, or TKA) is a common procedure for people with severe knee arthritis or injury. While the surgery often leads to significant pain relief and improved mobility, the days and weeks afterward can be uncomfortable. Managing pain during recovery is important-not just to make patients feel better, but also to help them move their knee sooner, avoid excessive use of opioid medications, and get back to normal activities faster.

One common pain management tool is called a pericapsular injection (PAI). This is a mixture of medications injected around the knee joint during surgery to help control pain after the operation. PAIs usually include a long-lasting numbing medicine, an anti-inflammatory drug, and sometimes other medications that improve pain relief. Corticosteroids-powerful anti-inflammatory drugs-are sometimes added, but the best type of steroid and the ideal way to give it is still debated among doctors.

Why This Study Is Being Done This study will compare two types of corticosteroids, methylprednisolone (a traditional steroid) and Zilretta (a newer, extended-release form of the steroid triamcinolone), to see which works better when added to the standard PAI. Zilretta releases medication slowly over time, which may lead to longer-lasting pain control and fewer side effects such as temporary increases in blood sugar-something especially important for people with diabetes.

How the Study Works

Patients having total knee replacement will be randomly placed into one of three groups:

  1. Standard PAI only - This mixture includes a long-acting numbing medicine, an anti-inflammatory (ketorolac), a small dose of adrenaline (epinephrine), clonidine (to help with pain control), and sterile saline.
  2. Standard PAI + methylprednisolone - The same standard mixture with the addition of 40 mg of methylprednisolone.
  3. Standard PAI + Zilretta - The same standard mixture with 32 mg of Zilretta, the extended-release steroid.

People with diabetes or prediabetes will only be placed in groups 1 or 3 so researchers can compare how Zilretta affects them compared to no steroid at all.

What Will Be Measured

The researchers will check patients' progress at several points after surgery to investigate:

  • Pain levels
  • Opioid pain medication use (measured in morphine-equivalent doses)
  • Knee movement (range of motion)
  • Need for further procedures (such as manipulation under anesthesia, or MUA, if the knee becomes too stiff)
  • Patient-reported outcome surveys (including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation) Expected Findings

The team believes that adding a corticosteroid to the PAI will:

  • Improve pain control
  • Reduce the need for opioid medications
  • Lower the risk of needing a manipulation procedure to improve range of motion They also expect that Zilretta, because it lasts longer, will work better than methylprednisolone-especially in people with diabetes, by offering pain relief without causing as much temporary increase in blood sugar.

Why This Matters Past research shows that PAIs can help reduce pain and the need for opioids after knee replacement surgery, without raising the risk of infection or other serious complications. But doctors still don't know which steroid is best to use. If Zilretta works better and causes fewer side effects, it could become the preferred option for many patients-particularly those with other health issues like diabetes.

The results of this study could help guide surgeons toward the safest and most effective pain control strategies for people recovering from knee replacement surgery, ultimately leading to better recoveries, fewer complications, and improved quality of life.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
240

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20889
        • Recruiting
        • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Garrett Neel, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robert W Tracey, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sean E Slaven, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ian P Marshall, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John P. Cody, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients within the MHS who are DEERS eligible undergoing primary TKA at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC), Surgery Center of Chevy Chase or District Surgery Center
  • Age 18 or older
  • successful surgical intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA)
  • Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA)
  • Females who are pregnant or nursing
  • Allergic to ingredients in PAI or previous adverse reaction to steroids being used in this study
  • Diabetics will be excluded from Group 2 (standard PAI + methylprednisolone)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard PAI
Group1 (n=80; 40 non-diabetic and 40 diabetic participants): Standard PAI: 30 mg Toradol/ketorolac (30mg/ml), 49.25ml 0.5% ropivacaine (5mg/ml), and 0.5 mg epinephrine (1mg/ml), 0.8 ml clonidine (0.1mg/ml) and 8.45 ml 0.9% sodium chloride
Drug: PAI
Standard PAI: 30 mg Toradol/ketorolac (30mg/ml), 49.25ml 0.5% ropivacaine (5mg/ml), and 0.5 mg
Active Comparator: Methylprednisolone
2. Group2 (n=40, non-diabetic): Standard PAI + 40mg methylprednisolone (n = 40)
Drug: PAI + steroid
Standard PAI + 40mg methylprednisolone (n = 40)
Other Names:
  • PAI + methylprednisolone
Active Comparator: Zilretta
3. Group3 (n=80; 40 non-diabetic and 40 diabetic participants): Standard PAI + 32mg Zilretta (triamcinolone acetonide extended release injectable suspension)
Drug: PAI + zilretta
Standard PAI + 32mg Zilretta (triamcinolone acetonide extended release injectable suspension)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome is to determine whether total knee arthroplasty outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone.
Time Frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, and 28 days post

The following outcomes after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone:

• Improvement in pain levels postoperatively based on measurement of pain intensity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24hrs, 72 hours, and 7 days (all phone call), and 28 days
24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, and 28 days post
Postoperative ROM
Time Frame: 28, 120 and 365 days postop
The following outcomes after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone: Change in range of motion (ROM) at 28, 120 and 365 days postop
28, 120 and 365 days postop
Patient reported outcome measure
Time Frame: 120 and 365 days postoperatively

The following outcomes after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone:

• Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score at 120 and 365 days postoperatively
120 and 365 days postoperatively
Patient reported outcome measures 2
Time Frame: 120 and 365 days postop

The following outcomes after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone:

• Change in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score at 120 and 365 days postop
120 and 365 days postop
Postop pain medication usage
Time Frame: 24hrs, 72 hours, and 7 days, and 28 days postop

The following outcomes after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone:

• Decreased morphine equivalent (MEQ) postoperatively at 24hrs, 72 hours, and 7 days (all phone call), and 28 days
24hrs, 72 hours, and 7 days, and 28 days postop
MUA rate
Time Frame: 28 days postop

The following outcome after total knee arthroplasty will be compared to determine whether outcomes are significantly better for Zilretta (Group 3) and methylprednisolone (Group 2) as compared to standard PAI (Group 1) and Zilretta versus methylprednisolone:

• Decreased manipulation under anesthesia rates (MUA) compared to historical rate at our institution at 28 days
28 days postop

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events and subgroup analysis
Time Frame: 28 days, 120 days, 365 days postop
To determine whether the adverse event rates associated with Zilretta and methylprednisolone are significantly less than the adverse event rates for standard PAI.
28 days, 120 days, 365 days postop

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John P Cody, MD, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 25-21385

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings