Enhancing Addiction Treatment Through Psychoeducation

August 4, 2026 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Enhancing Addiction Treatment Through Psychoeducation: Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Neuroscience-Informed Mobile App

Addiction is a brain disorder characterized by a broad range of both apparent and subtle cognitive impairments in attention, memory, executive functions, and decision-making. These cognitive problems are clinically significant and may contribute to poor treatment outcomes in people with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs), such as a high risk of dropout, low treatment compliance, and shorter periods of abstinence. Studies on cognitive function in SUDs reveal that chronic use of drugs and alcohol can also negatively affect another crucial component of cognition: awareness, or metacognition. Metacognition is defined as an individual's ability to perceive and understand their cognitive functions and use this understanding to regulate them. One of the key consequences of metacognitive impairments is the lack of insight in people with SUDs, which adversely affects treatment outcomes. Substance users with poor metacognition are more reluctant to initiate or continue treatment and are more likely to deny their cognitive problems. Therefore, improving metacognition may remove or reduce motivational barriers to invest time and effort in the recovery process in general, and in the brain recovery process specifically. Despite the importance of neurocognition and metacognition in the recovery process for substance users, there is a dearth of interventions designed to target these functions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To address this gap, the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) program was developed as one of the first initiatives in the field of SUDs to raise individuals' awareness about cognitive deficits (metacognition) associated with drug and alcohol use. NIPA is an app-based digital program that integrates neuroscience-based psychoeducation and game-based cognitive training. It consists of four 20-minute-long sessions covering neurocognitive functions commonly impaired in SUDs, such as attention, memory, cognitive flexibility, and impulsivity / decision-making. Each session includes videos, animations and cartoons depicting specific cognitive problems (e.g. in attention, decision-making, etc.), followed by games created by adapting common neurocognitive tasks (e.g. Stroop task, gambling task), designed to engage the specific cognitive function reviewed in the session and to raise individual's awareness of how they employ these cognitive functions to solve game-based puzzles and real-life problems. Each cognitive function is depicted in terms of the underlying brain network(s) (e.g. default mode network, salience network), which is followed by a set of brain training strategies and exercises that aim to improve resilience when exposed to substances and to motivate patients to invest time and effort in their treatment and to pursue cognitive rehabilitation interventions. The main goals of the proposed study are to determine whether the intervention is feasible and acceptable for patients with SUDs who are currently in treatment; and to obtain some preliminary data on its utility to increase metacognitive awareness, reduce depression and anxiety, and improve daily executive functioning and impulse control in patients with SUDs. We hypothesize that providing patients with the NIPA program may improve their metacognition, daily executive function, and mental health.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Recruiting
        • Virginia Commonwealth University
        • Contact:
          • kayla McLean
          • Phone Number: 804-828-8402
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jasmin Vassileva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • current DSM-5 opioid and/or stimulant use disorder
  • currently on medication treatment for SUD
  • owning a smartphone with sufficient functionality to download and utilize the NIPA app.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current psychosis, mania, or suicidal/homicidal ideation
  • non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: The intervention condition
The intervention condition consists of TAU plus four ~20-minute long NIPA sessions, administered a week apart (NIPA+TAU). Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.
Other: Installing the Metacognium software app
Participants in the NIPA+TAU group will be sent two, URL's (one for iOS and one for Android) for installing the Metacognium software app, which hosts the four NIPA sessions. Participants will be provided with unique ID for registering and using the program on the Metacognium app. The NIPA sessions will be locked until participants have completed their baseline assessment. Once participants complete each NIPA session, they will receive an email and/or text notifying them that the next session is unlocked and that they can proceed to complete it.
Placebo Comparator: Control condition
The control condition consists of treatment as usual (TAU) consisting of medication treatment (buprenorphine) and group or individual behavior therapy. Participants in both intervention and control conditions would undergo two survey assessments on REDCap, one at baseline and one at the end of the intervention for the NIPA+TAU condition or at the end of week 4 for the TAU condition.
Other: Continue treatment as usual
Continue your treatment schedule as usual with the for 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of recruiting for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The recruitment rate is quantified as the % of all participants who satisfy the inclusion criteria and agree to participate.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Retention/adherence rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) Intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Retention/adherence rate is quantified as the % of participants who remain enrolled until the end of the study, completing all NIPA sessions and pre- and post-assessments.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Completion rate for the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Completion rate, indexing the number of training sessions completed by each participant.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Measure acceptability of the Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation for Addiction (NIPA) intervention
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Acceptability is measured with a 10-item questionnaire that uses a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability. Items include perceived enjoyment, convenience, informativeness, applicability, effectiveness, satisfaction, continued use, barriers to use, and most/least liked aspects.
Baseline through 4 week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess Drug Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Drug knowledge is assessed using a questionnaire developed by our team. The questionnaire consists of 12 true-or-false items adapted from the psychoeducational materials provided in the program. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline before the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Drug knowledge scores will be calculated as the total number of true responses and reported as both numbers and percentages.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Measure attitudes towards drugs and alcohol
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The Attitudes Toward Alcohol Use Scale and the Attitudes Toward Drug Use Scale each consist of four items. Intentions for use will be measured by asking participants to rate their intention to use various substances in the next six months on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater intention to use. The scales evaluate participants' consideration of being under the influence of the respective substances. Participants complete the questionnaire at baseline, prior to the intervention, and again after the intervention has concluded. Attitudes toward drugs and alcohol will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Intention for Substance Use
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Intention to use drugs and alcohol will be measured by asking participants to rate their intention to use various substances in the next month on a 7-point Likert scale, Higher scores indicate greater intention to use. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline prior to the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Intentions to use will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Metacognitive Awareness
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The 15-item Mindful Attention Awareness Scale will measure metacognitive awareness. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher total scores reflecting greater levels of mindfulness and awareness. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline before the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. The metacognitive awareness total score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Negative Affect-Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Anxiety will be measured using the PROMIS Anxiety Scale, a 4-item measure of emotional distress related to fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal, and associated somatic symptoms experienced over the past 7 days. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, reflecting the frequency of the symptoms. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline, before the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Anxiety total score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Negative Affect- Depression
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
Depression will be measured using the PROMIS Depression Scale, a 4-item measure of negative mood, self-perception, social cognition, and reduced positive affect and engagement. It measures the frequency of each symptom using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline, before the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Depression total score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Drug Abstinence Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The Drug Abstinence Self-Efficacy Scale is a 20-item scale that will be used to measure a participants confidence to remain abstinent from alcohol and drug use in situations that elicit drinking or substance use cues. It consists of four subscales measuring types of relapse precipitants such as negative affect, positive social, physical, and other concerns, and withdrawal and urges, measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy to resist substance use in challenging situations. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline prior to the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Self-efficacy total score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation.
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Barkley Deficits in executive functioning
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The Barkley Deficits in Executive Function Scale will be used to measure subjective deficits in executive functioning as they manifest in daily life, using a 4-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater executive function deficits. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline, prior to the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Deficits in executive functioning total score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation
Baseline through 4 week intervention
Delay Discounting
Time Frame: Baseline through 4 week intervention
The Monetary-Choice Questionnaire, consisting of 27 items, will be used to assess delay discounting. The participant chooses between a smaller, immediate (hypothetical) monetary reward and a larger, delayed monetary reward. These choices are used to calculate a discounting rate parameter (k). Higher k values indicate a stronger preference for immediate rewards and thus greater impulsivity. Participants will complete the questionnaire at baseline before the intervention, and again after the intervention ends. Discounting rate (K) score will be reported using the mean and standard deviation. Parametric t-test or nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to examine between-group differences, and paired t-test or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test to determine if the within-individual change in the group is statistically significant. Pre-existing differences in all measures collected at baseline will be controlled in subsequent analyses, using baseline scores as covariates.
Baseline through 4 week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jasmin Vassileva, Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HM300000090

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings