Hearing Loss and Brain Health Study

May 6, 2026 updated by: Janet Choi, University of Southern California
Hearing loss is a prevalent and modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia in older adults, yet access to hearing care remains limited. Over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids represent a promising and scalable strategy to expand access, particularly for individuals at elevated risk for dementia who may benefit most from earlier intervention. This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of OTC hearing aid use among older adults. Participants aged ≥50 years will undergo standardized hearing screening to identify bilateral, mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of two sequences: (1) immediate intervention: 3-mo using OTC hearing aids or (2) waitlist control: 3-mo without devices followed by OTC hearing aid use after 3 months. Feasibility outcomes include study enrollment and retention, protocol adherence, and average daily device use determined by data-logging. Acceptability outcomes will be assessed using the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), device satisfaction ratings, and participant intention to continue hearing-aid use. Hearing outcomes include validated questionnaires on hearing and listening efforts. Findings will inform the design of larger trials aimed at improving access to hearing care and promoting cognitive health.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90066
        • University of Southern California
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >= 50 years
  • Known APOE status
  • Bilateral mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss
  • No current use of hearing aids or cochlear implants
  • No diagnosis of dementia and able to provide informed consent
  • Able to complete questionnaires and follow instructions in English
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures, follow-up visits, and hearing-aid use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of dementia
  • Severe or profound hearing loss
  • Self-reported congenital hearing loss
  • Absence of an ear canal due to medical conditions or prior surgical procedures
  • unwillingness to wear OTC hearing aids regularly (>=4 hours/day)
  • medical contraindication to use hearing aids (e.g., actively draining ear)
  • Known retrocochlear pathology
  • Severe uncorrected visual impairment or significant manual dexterity limitations that prevent handling the device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immediate Intervention
Immediate Intervention: 3-month of OTC hearing aid use
Device: Over-The-Counter (OTC) hearing aid
Over-The-Counter (OTC) hearing aid
Active Comparator: Waitlist control
Waitlist control: Basic patient education on hearing loss without OTC hearing aid for 3 months, followed by OTC hearing aid fitting
Device: Over-The-Counter (OTC) hearing aid
Over-The-Counter (OTC) hearing aid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Enrollment rate (% eligible who consent)
Time Frame: Baseline
Feasibility - Enrollment rate (% eligible who consent)
Baseline
Feasibility- Proportion of enrolled participants who complete all study periods
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility- Proportion of enrolled participants who complete all study periods
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Study visit completion rate (% of planned visits completed)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Study visit completion rate (% of planned visits completed)
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Frequency of device troubleshooting encounters
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Frequency of device troubleshooting encounters
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Percentage achieving >= 6hours/day of objective wear time
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Percentage achieving >= 4hours/day of objective wear time
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Hearing aid use adherence (mean daily wear time from data-logging)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Hearing aid use adherence (mean daily wear time from data-logging)
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Protocol adherence rate (% completing scheduled assessments)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Protocol adherence rate (% completing scheduled assessments)
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Retention rate (% completing follow-up visits)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Feasibility - Retention rate (% completing follow-up visits)
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Acceptability - International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) The IOI-HA is a 7-item self-report questionnaire assessing hearing aid outcomes across domains including daily use, benefit, residual activity limitation, satisfaction, residual participation restriction, impact on others, and quality of life. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with total scores ranging from 7 to 35. Higher scores indicate better hearing aid outcomes and greater perceived benefit/satisfaction.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Acceptability - Intention to continue use after study completion
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Acceptability - Intention to continue use after study completion Participant-reported intention to continue hearing aid use after study completion will be assessed using a Likert-scale questionnaire. Responses are scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater willingness and acceptability for continued hearing aid use. Minimum score: 1; maximum score: 5. Higher scores represent better outcomes (greater intention to continue use).
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hearing Handicap Inventory - Screening Version
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly - Screening Version (HHIE-S) The HHIE-S is a 10-item self-report questionnaire assessing the emotional and social/situational effects of hearing loss in older adults. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived hearing handicap and worse hearing-related quality of life. Minimum score: 0; maximum score: 40. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Vanderbilt fatigue scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up
Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale - Adult Hearing Loss (VFS-AHL) The Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale - Adult Hearing Loss (VFS-AHL) is a self-report measure assessing listening-related fatigue in adults with hearing loss. Scores are derived using item-response theory-based scoring and are typically transformed to a standardized scale ranging from approximately -2 to +2 logits, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue and worse outcomes. Higher scores represent worse listening-related fatigue.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Southern California

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 6, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • APP-25-05793

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

At this time, individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. Because this is a small feasibility pilot study involving a high-risk population, and the primary study outcomes are feasibility and acceptability metrics rather than clinical endpoints, we do not anticipate that sharing individual-level data would provide meaningful scientific value.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Over-The-Counter (OTC) hearing aid

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings