Over-the-counter (OTC) Labels for Older Adults

April 10, 2024 updated by: Mark Becker, Michigan State University
Optimizing OTC labels for older adults: Empirical evaluation of labels designed to provide older users the information they need to to minimize adverse drug events

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The overarching goal is to design and evaluate a novel front of pack label for OTC drugs that will reduce the prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in older adults. To do so the researchers will survey pharmacists to ascertain which label information is most important to the reduction of ADRs, and then will design novel OTC labels which highlight this information. To evaluate the effectiveness of these designs, the investigators propose five experiments where older adults will make judgments about OTC appropriateness.

Study 1 - Survey of Pharmacists - Overseen by University of Wisconsin - Online Survey of pharmacists to evaluate which aspects in a drug facts labels are most critical to the reduction of adverse drug events.

Experiment 2 - Change Detection- Computer screen flashes between a label and the same label which has been modify slightly. Participant is instructed to locate the change as quickly as possible. Change should be detected more quickly for labels that engage users in bottom-up processing.

Experiment 3A- Absolute Judgement- Participant is asked a yes/no question about whether a product being displayed on a computer monitor is appropriate given a scenario. Half the scenarios involve active ingredient and half warning information. Time accuracy will indicate which labels are most effective.

Experiment 3B-Cross Product Comparison-Participant is given a scenario (that requires active ingredient or warning information) and is asked to select the appropriate OTC from a set of options(both products presented in identical labeling format within a trial). Again, speed an accuracy will be used to evaluate the most effective label designs.

Experiment 4- Judging Product Appropriateness- Participants judge whether a drug is appropriate for them based on their health and current medications. Information content varies across trials to determine how much information is required to make an informed decision. Response accuracy (relative to expert pharmacists from the University of Wisconsin's evaluation) as a function of the information presented will be used to determine information that is critical to make a correct decision and how well do the participants get that information from the standard principle display panel (PDP- the front panel) and the Drug Facts Label.

Experiment 5 - Eye tracking during appropriateness judgments - Participants evaluate whether an OTC medication is appropriate for their use, given their current health status and medication intake. Label formats will include current standards and an optimized label (derived from earlier experiments). Appropriateness judgments will be evaluated by pharmacists at University of Wisconsin, and the participant's eye movements will be monitored as they inspect the drugs. Comparisons across drug label formats will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate whether the optimized format more effectively garners attention and improves decision making.

Experiment 6 - Will be a replication of Experiment 5's methods but will use commercial brands rather than the mock brands in Experiment 5. This will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate the extent to which the effects found in Experiment 5 generalize to commercial brands about which participants may have prior familiarity and which contain branding information.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

420

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • East Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48824
        • Michigan State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 110 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participant must be 65+
  • participant must be legally sighted
  • participant must be able purchase and administer their own medications
  • participant must be able to perform consent without assistance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • if the participant has history of seizures
  • if the participant has impaired memory

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Condition 1 - Control
We note that our within subjects experimental design, in which each subject receives all treatments, is not well suited to this system of reporting. Thus we are defining "arms" as the label treatments we are evaluating. This label is the control label treatment which represents the current, legally required over-the-counter labeling standard.
Experimental: Condition 2 - Highlighted
This condition will involve a novel method of presenting critical active ingredient, drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information with highlighting.
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
  • OTC drug label
Experimental: Condition 3 - FOP warning label
This condition will involve presenting critical drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information in a novel Front-of-Pack (FOP) warning label.
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
  • OTC drug label
Experimental: Condition 4- FOP+Highlighting label
This condition will combine both the highlighting and FOP labeling interventions from conditions 2 and 3. Note: Across the four arms we are essentially doing a 2 (highlighting/no highlighting) by 2 (front of pack warning/ no front of pack warning) within subjects design.
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
  • OTC drug label

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Detection in Over the Counter Medicine Labels
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Looks at differences between two sets of images of medicine labels and locates the change between two sets of labels.
60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark W Becker, PhD, Michigan State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 16, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY00000832

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Drug Event

Clinical Trials on Over the counter drug labels

Subscribe