- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04345731
Over-the-counter (OTC) Labels for Older Adults
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The overarching goal is to design and evaluate a novel front of pack label for OTC drugs that will reduce the prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) in older adults. To do so the researchers will survey pharmacists to ascertain which label information is most important to the reduction of ADRs, and then will design novel OTC labels which highlight this information. To evaluate the effectiveness of these designs, the investigators propose five experiments where older adults will make judgments about OTC appropriateness.
Study 1 - Survey of Pharmacists - Overseen by University of Wisconsin - Online Survey of pharmacists to evaluate which aspects in a drug facts labels are most critical to the reduction of adverse drug events.
Experiment 2 - Change Detection- Computer screen flashes between a label and the same label which has been modify slightly. Participant is instructed to locate the change as quickly as possible. Change should be detected more quickly for labels that engage users in bottom-up processing.
Experiment 3A- Absolute Judgement- Participant is asked a yes/no question about whether a product being displayed on a computer monitor is appropriate given a scenario. Half the scenarios involve active ingredient and half warning information. Time accuracy will indicate which labels are most effective.
Experiment 3B-Cross Product Comparison-Participant is given a scenario (that requires active ingredient or warning information) and is asked to select the appropriate OTC from a set of options(both products presented in identical labeling format within a trial). Again, speed an accuracy will be used to evaluate the most effective label designs.
Experiment 4- Judging Product Appropriateness- Participants judge whether a drug is appropriate for them based on their health and current medications. Information content varies across trials to determine how much information is required to make an informed decision. Response accuracy (relative to expert pharmacists from the University of Wisconsin's evaluation) as a function of the information presented will be used to determine information that is critical to make a correct decision and how well do the participants get that information from the standard principle display panel (PDP- the front panel) and the Drug Facts Label.
Experiment 5 - Eye tracking during appropriateness judgments - Participants evaluate whether an OTC medication is appropriate for their use, given their current health status and medication intake. Label formats will include current standards and an optimized label (derived from earlier experiments). Appropriateness judgments will be evaluated by pharmacists at University of Wisconsin, and the participant's eye movements will be monitored as they inspect the drugs. Comparisons across drug label formats will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate whether the optimized format more effectively garners attention and improves decision making.
Experiment 6 - Will be a replication of Experiment 5's methods but will use commercial brands rather than the mock brands in Experiment 5. This will allow the primary investigators at Michigan State University to evaluate the extent to which the effects found in Experiment 5 generalize to commercial brands about which participants may have prior familiarity and which contain branding information.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
East Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48824
- Michigan State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- participant must be 65+
- participant must be legally sighted
- participant must be able purchase and administer their own medications
- participant must be able to perform consent without assistance.
Exclusion Criteria:
- if the participant has history of seizures
- if the participant has impaired memory
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Condition 1 - Control
We note that our within subjects experimental design, in which each subject receives all treatments, is not well suited to this system of reporting.
Thus we are defining "arms" as the label treatments we are evaluating.
This label is the control label treatment which represents the current, legally required over-the-counter labeling standard.
|
|
|
Experimental: Condition 2 - Highlighted
This condition will involve a novel method of presenting critical active ingredient, drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information with highlighting.
|
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Condition 3 - FOP warning label
This condition will involve presenting critical drug/drug, and drug/diagnosis information in a novel Front-of-Pack (FOP) warning label.
|
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Condition 4- FOP+Highlighting label
This condition will combine both the highlighting and FOP labeling interventions from conditions 2 and 3. Note: Across the four arms we are essentially doing a 2 (highlighting/no highlighting) by 2 (front of pack warning/ no front of pack warning) within subjects design.
|
A control condition based on the current standard OTC label and 3 experimental labels will be compared to identify OTC labels that more effectively communicate critical information for the reduction of adverse drug events to the consumer
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change Detection in Over the Counter Medicine Labels
Time Frame: 60 minutes
|
Looks at differences between two sets of images of medicine labels and locates the change between two sets of labels.
|
60 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark W Becker, PhD, Michigan State University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Becker MW, Kashy DA, Harben A, Venkatesan K, Rodriguez A, Kebede M, Martin B, Breslow R, Bix L. A novel strategy to optimize critical information on over the counter labels for older adults. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 25;6(1):e1062. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1062. eCollection 2023 Jan.
- Martin BA, Breslow RM, Sims A, Harben AL, Bix L, Becker MW. Identifying over-the-counter information to prioritize for the purpose of reducing adverse drug reactions in older adults: A national survey of pharmacists. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jan-Feb;62(1):167-175.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
- Harben AL, Kashy DA, Esfahanian S, Liu L, Bix L, Becker MW. Using change detection to objectively evaluate whether novel over-the-counter drug labels can increase attention to critical health information among older adults. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 26;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00307-z.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00000832
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Adverse Drug Event
-
University of RochesterAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedAdverse Drug Event, Potential Adverse Drug Event, and Quality MeasuresUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Vancouver Coastal Health; Ministry...Not yet recruitingAdverse Drug Event | Adverse Drug Reaction
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteMcGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)CompletedAdverse Drug EventsCanada
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Completed
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); Baycrest Centre for Geriatric...WithdrawnAdverse Drug Events
-
University of PittsburghRANDCompletedAdverse Drug EventsUnited States
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompletedAdverse Drug EventsUnited States
-
Westview Physician CollaborativeCompletedAdverse Drug EventsCanada
-
Indiana UniversityBrigham and Women's HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Over the counter drug labels
-
HearX SAWithdrawnHearing Loss | Hearing Impairment | Self Perceived Hearing Loss
-
Yu-Hsiang WuNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Completed
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRecruiting
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstWithdrawnHearing Loss, FunctionalUnited States
-
Illinois Urogynecology, Ltd.UnknownColon CleansingUnited States
-
Yu-Hsiang WuVanderbilt University Medical Center; National Institute on Deafness and Other... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHearing Loss, Sensorineural | PresbycusisUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverAmerican Diabetes AssociationEnrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes | Non Insulin Dependent DiabetesUnited States
-
University of UtahCompletedDominantly Inherited Stargardt's Disease (STGD3)United States
-
Gerald SupinskiCompleted
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNot yet recruiting