Protocolised Management of Phosphate Replacement Trial (PROMPT)

December 4, 2025 updated by: Caboolture Hospital

A Comparison of Two Phosphate Replacement Protocols for Critically Ill Patients Treated in an Intensive Care Unit: a Cluster, Crossover, Comparative Effectiveness, Randomised, Controlled Trial

The aim of this cluster, crossover, randomised controlled trial is to compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients.

We hypothesise that protocolised restricted phosphate replacement, compared to protocolised liberal phosphate replacement, will result in reduced administration of phosphate with similar clinical outcomes.

All eligible Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients will be included during their admission with the selected protocol for that period as per usual practice and treatment standards.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study looks to compare liberal and restrictive phosphate replacement protocols (each arm is a current "standard of care" already used in practice) to investigate whether restrictive phosphate replacement in critically ill patients leads to reduced phosphate administration and/or equivalent patient outcomes.

Derangements of serum phosphate concentrations are common among ICU patients; high and low levels variably associated with worse outcomes. The PROMPT trial will compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients. Phosphate is currently replaced routinely in ICU's however there is not a standardised evidence-based guideline to effectively guide phosphate administration for ICU patients

This is a cluster, crossover, electronic medical record integrated, randomised, controlled trial. Sites (not patients) will be randomised to wither the liberal or restrictive phosphate replacement protocol for a 6-month period, followed by a 1-month washout period, before switching to the next protocol for the preceding 6-month period. The allocated phosphate replacement protocol will be updated in the electronic medical record to be followed; this process is already part of normal clinical practice.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients admitted to participating intensive care units during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There will be no specific exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol
The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.
Other: Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol
The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.
Active Comparator: Conservative Phosphate Replacement Protocol
The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.
Other: Restrictive Phosphate Replacement Protocol
The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
non-inferiority for days alive and free of the intensive care unit (ICU) up to 30 days (DAF-ICU-30)
Time Frame: 30 Days post study enrolment
The primary outcome will be assessed as non-inferiority in the number of days alive and free of ICU within 30 days from study enrolment. ICU length of stay will be used to calculate. This measure is reported on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst outcome: death or full ICU stay) to 30 (best outcome: alive and ICU-free for all 30 days), where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The difference between groups will be expressed as a mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.
30 Days post study enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phosphate usage
Time Frame: individual arm and total quantities used over 12-month study period
Quantities of intravenous and oral phosphate replaced (total and individually)
individual arm and total quantities used over 12-month study period
Patients receiving phosphate
Time Frame: total proportion of patients receiving phosphate throughout 12-month study period
Proportion of patients receiving any phosphate replacement
total proportion of patients receiving phosphate throughout 12-month study period
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
Total time spent in hospital - hospital admission time to hospital discharge time
hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
Hospital Mortality
Time Frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
hospital mortality rates for all participants throughout study period
hospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study period
cardiac rhythm disturbance
Time Frame: ICU admission to ICU discharge, throughout 12-month study period
Symptomatic cardiac rhythm disturbance (cardiac arrhythmia that requires treatment with chemical or electric cardioversion)
ICU admission to ICU discharge, throughout 12-month study period
Mechanical ventilation hours
Time Frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period
Hours of invasive mechanical ventilation
hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period
Tracheal reintubation
Time Frame: hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period
Tracheal intubation requirement during admission
hospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Caboolture Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Queensland University of Technology

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mahesh Ramanan, +61 7 5433 8888

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HREC/2025/MNH/121108

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypophosphatemia

Clinical Trials on Liberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings