Stakeholders of Rare Diseases Informing Values In Neuroethics

May 20, 2026 updated by: St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
The purpose of this research study is to learn more about the perspectives of key stakeholders-patients, families, healthcare providers, and researchers-on the ethical challenges of small-scale, personalized treatment trials for rare neurological diseases (RND).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Primary Objectives

  • To utilize semi-structured interviews to identify key stakeholder preferences and gather recommendations for the ethical conduct of n-of-few approaches in pediatric patients with rare neurological diseases (RND).
  • Identify key challenges and best practices for informed consent and communication strategies for personalized interventions in pediatric RND trials.
  • To develop a best practice framework for the ethical conduct of research involving personalized interventions for children with catastrophic RND.

Secondary Objectives

  • To use surveys to quantitatively measure trust in health care providers and medical researchers, quality of life, and resilience in families of a patient or patients with an RND.
  • To elicit feedback from patients and families on their perceived utility of existing patient reported outcome (PROs) measures relevant to capturing their illness experience and needs.

This study will employ a mixed-methods approach to comprehensively understand the perspectives of families and non-family stakeholders regarding personalized research programs in super-rare, catastrophic neurologic disorders. The study will utilize validated surveys, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups.

Group 1: Primary Caregivers/Patients (Longitudinal Approach)

  • Participants will complete validated quality-of-life inventories at baseline and once-to-twice per year over the study period.

  • Semi-structured interviews will be conducted at the time of enrollment, then approximately every 6 months through the end of the study period, focusing on:

    • Views on a priori-defined research ethics topics.
    • Understanding the family's illness experience and any significant changes since the previous interview.
    • Reflective recaps of previous interviews to identify shifts in attitudes.

Group 2: Other Family Stakeholders (Cross-Sectional Approach)

  • This group will participate in single interviews or focus groups, as determined by participant choice. Participants will be referred to study team by Group 1 participants and will be interviewed after their relative in Group 1 has completed at least one interview. They will provide insights into how families apply the concepts of the Belmont Report (e.g., autonomy and justice) to their experiences and define "benefit" and "risk" in the context of personalized treatments.
  • This portion of the study will focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that are meaningful to families.

Group 3: Non-Family Stakeholders

  • Semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and listening sessions will be conducted to explore ethical best practices and potential pitfalls in delivering n-of-few therapies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
385

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38105
        • Recruiting
        • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Liza M. Johnson, MD, MPH, MSB
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Those who meet the Eligibility Criteria and agree to participate.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Group 1 (Parental Caregiver and Patient Participants)

  • Parental/primary caregiver with a child who has a genetic diagnosis of an ultrarare disorder with pediatric onset, or a clinical diagnosis with a suspected genetic etiology.
  • Child is under 21 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • Child has an expected survival of at least one year following study enrollment.
  • Patients (age ≤ 25 years) with a genetic diagnosis of an ultrarare disorder with pediatric onset, or clinical diagnosis with suspected genetic etiology.
  • Willingness to provide verbal informed consent (or assent, as appropriate) to participate

Group 2 (Other Family)

  • Family member of a Group 1 participant who plays an active role in the child's life or care.
  • Includes siblings (≥ 13 years of age), grandparents, or other non-primary caregivers directly affected by the child's diagnosis.
  • Demonstrated familiarity with the child's medical and family experience.
  • Willingness to provide verbal informed consent (or assent, as appropriate) to participate.

Group 3 (Non-Family Stakeholders)

  • Individuals currently engaged, or recently active, in clinical care, research, advocacy or policy work related to pediatric-onset rare genetic disorders.
  • May include clinicians (e.g., neurologists, genetic counselors, nurses, child-life specialists, home-health staff), members of patient-advocacy organizations, institutional-review-board (IRB) members, payers, sponsors, funders, or representatives of hospital systems or regulatory agencies.
  • Willingness to provide verbal informed consent to participate in semi-structured interviews or focus groups

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limited English proficiency
  • Unable to complete the survey materials or complete the interviews in English.
  • Inability or unwillingness of research participant to give verbal informed consent (in English)
  • Condition or chronic illness, which in the opinion of the PI/Co-I, makes participation unsafe or untenable (i.e., cognitive impairment, concurrent acute morbidity).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Primary Caregivers/Patients
Primary caregivers of children/young adults (age 21 or younger) and patients (age 25 or younger) diagnosed with a super-rare, catastrophic neurologic disorder without definitive FDA-approved treatment.
Other Family Stakeholders
Siblings (13 years or older) and extended family members (e.g., grandparents) and primary caregivers who prefer not to participate in the longitudinal component
Non-Family Stakeholders
Non-family stakeholders involved in the clinical care or investigational treatments of children with catastrophic illnesses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identifying key stakeholder preferences and recommendations for the ethical conduct of n-of-few approaches in pediatric patients with rare neurological diseases (RND) utilizing semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years (Group 1); Once, within 60 days of enrollment (single interview per Group 2 and 3 participant)
Semi-structured interviews will be analyzed using MAXQDA software to identify themes though a systematic and standardized process. A deductive approach willl be used to formulate initial codes based on research questions and interview guides developed. Additional themes and codes will be developed using an inductive approach where new codes are allowed to emerge after review of the transcripts by three study team members trained in content analysis. To compensate for the multiple appearance of a code in a single interview, the percentage of patients for whom the code appeared will be tallied. Codes will be grouped and identified as a theme that captures the shared meaning. The definitions of each of the combined codes will be compared to arrive at a final definition for each theme. As with the codes, the frequency of occurrence of each theme and the percentage of patients to which each theme applied will be tallied, as well as inter-rater reliability.
At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years (Group 1); Once, within 60 days of enrollment (single interview per Group 2 and 3 participant)
Identify key challenges and ethics-informed best practices for the development and implementation of personalized or n-of-few genomic interventions for rare and catastrophic pediatric disorders.
Time Frame: At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years (Group 1); Once, within 60 days of enrollment (single interview per Group 2 and 3 participant)
Semi-structured interviews will be analyzed using MAXQDA software to identify themes though a systematic and standardized process. A deductive approach will be used to formulate initial codes based on research questions and interview guides developed. Additional themes and codes will be developed using an inductive approach where new codes are allowed to emerge after review of the transcripts by three study team members trained in content analysis. To compensate for the multiple appearance of a code in a single interview, the percentage of patients for whom the code appeared will be tallied. Codes will be grouped and identified as a theme that captures the shared meaning. The definitions of each of the combined codes will be compared to arrive at a final definition for each theme. As with the codes, the frequency of occurrence of each theme and the percentage of patients to which each theme applied will be tallied, as well as inter-rater reliability.
At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years (Group 1); Once, within 60 days of enrollment (single interview per Group 2 and 3 participant)
To develop a best practice framework for the ethical conduct of research involving personalized interventions for children with catastrophic genetic disorders of childhood onset.
Time Frame: The panel will meet quarterly, beginning formal framework development in Year 3 until study completion, approximately 5 years.
An interdisciplinary advisory panel of approximately 20 expert partners will be established. The panel will be presented with clearly defined problems-on elements of respect for persons (informed consent, parental autonomy), beneficence (risk-benefit assessments), justice (fair subject selection, equity) and research obligations, among others-which will be reframed to them from multiple perspectives (from results of Objective 1 and 2). The working group will engage in decisional analysis, identifying and evaluating value trade-offs through moral discussion and consensus. This iterative process of integrating normative content with empirical findings will then lead to practical recommendations, optimizing positives and minimizing negatives.
The panel will meet quarterly, beginning formal framework development in Year 3 until study completion, approximately 5 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To elicit feedback from patients and families on their perceived utility of existing patient reported outcome (PROs) measures relevant to capturing their illness experience and needs.
Time Frame: At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years
Parent and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) will be quatified using the Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). The parents or patient will identify five important activities that their child is having difficulty with as a result of their condition. The parent rates difficulty on an 11-point numerical scale (0= unable to perform the activity: 10= able to perform activity. The average score for the five activities is the PSFS score. (ages one month-21 years) Higher scores indicate better functional ability in patient-identified, meaningful daily activities; lower scores indicate greater functional limitation in those activities. Since the PSFS is individualized, not norm-referenced, scores are meant to track change within the same child over time, rather than functioning as a tool for interpersonal comparison.
At baseline and every 6 months until end of study, approximately 5 years
Human Connection Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately annually during the study period, approximately 5 years
Caregiver trust in the child's health care provider will be assessed using the Human Connection Scale. This instrument evaluates how caregivers experience meaningful relationships within the health care context, including perceived empathy, understanding, emotional support, and attentiveness of the provider. Items are rated on a Likert-type scale reflecting agreement, confidence, or frequency and are summed to produce a total human connection score. Higher scores indicate greater perceived trust and stronger caregiver-provider relationships. Trust is examined as a factor that may influence caregiver willingness to pursue highly investigational treatments.
Baseline, then approximately annually during the study period, approximately 5 years
Trust in Medical Researchers Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately annually during the study period, approximately 5 years.
Caregiver trust in medical researchers and the research process will be measured using the Trust in Medical Researchers scale. This instrument assesses perceptions of researcher honesty, competence, transparency, and respect for participants, reflecting caregivers' experiences of meaningful relationships within the research context. Items are rated on a Likert-type scale and summed to generate an overall trust score. Higher scores indicate greater trust in medical researchers and the research enterprise.
Baseline, then approximately annually during the study period, approximately 5 years.
Caregiver Resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale)
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Caregiver resilience in the context of a child's catastrophic illness will be measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The CD-RISC consists of 25 items assessing domains including persistence, adaptability, sense of control, optimism, coping with stress, burden, uncertainty, and fears. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4 and summed to produce a total resilience score. Higher scores represent greater caregiver resilience.
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years.
Caregiver support needs will be assessed using the Caregiver Support Assessment Tool (CSNAT). The CSNAT is a 14-item instrument designed to identify caregiver needs across two domains: support required to enable caregiving activities and support required for the caregiver's own well-being. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from "no more support needed" to "very much more support needed." Responses are used to generate a profile of unmet support needs across domains, with higher ratings indicating greater unmet need.
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years.
Infant Health-Related Quality of Life (PedsQL Infant Module)
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Infant health-related quality of life will be measured using the PedsQL Infant Module. This parent-proxy instrument includes 36 items for infants aged 1-12 months and 45 items for infants aged 13-24 months. Subscales assess physical functioning, physical symptoms, emotional functioning, social functioning, and cognitive functioning. Items are rated on a Likert scale, reverse scored, and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Domain and total scores are calculated as averages of item scores, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Child and Adolescent Health-Related Quality of Life (PedsQL v4.0 Generic Core Scales)
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents will be assessed using the PedsQL v4.0 Generic Core Scales. This 23-item instrument includes subscales measuring physical, emotional, social, and school functioning. Items are rated on a Likert scale, reverse coded, and transformed to a 0-100 scale. Domain and total scores are calculated as averages of item scores, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Patient self-report and parent-proxy versions are used based on age. Items not meeting internal consistency thresholds will be reported descriptively.
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Neuromuscular Disease-Specific Quality of Life (PedsQL 3.0 Neuromuscular Module)
Time Frame: Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years
Disease-specific quality of life will be measured using the PedsQL 3.0 Neuromuscular Module. This 25-item instrument includes three domains: neuromuscular disease symptoms and impacts, communication about illness, and family resources. Items are rated on a Likert scale, reverse coded, and transformed to a 0-100 scale. Domain and total scores are calculated as averages of item scores, with higher scores indicating better disease-specific quality of life and family functioning. This measure will be completed only by participants with neuromuscular conditions.
Baseline, then approximately every 6 months during the study period, approximately 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Liza M. Johnson, MD, MPH, MSB, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 30, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 20, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STRIVE (Alias Study Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rare Disorder

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings