Incidence of Dysgeusia in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy (GustiAmo)
Incidenza Della Disgeusia Nei Pazienti Affetti da Carcinoma Mammario in Trattamento Chemioterapico: Uno Studio Pilota Prospettico
The goal of this observational study is to examine how frequently changes in taste occur in people with early-stage breast cancer who receive chemotherapy. It will also look at how these taste changes affect nutrition and quality of life. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- How many participants develop changes in taste during chemotherapy?
- How do these changes affect eating habits, nutrition, and daily life?
Participants are women with non-metastatic breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy before or after surgery.
Researchers will use standardized taste tests to measure how well participants can perceive different flavors. These tests are designed to provide accurate and reproducible results.
Participants will:
- Take part in taste tests during their chemotherapy treatment
- Have their nutritional status evaluated
- Answer questions about their quality of life
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Dysgeusia, defined as an altered perception of taste, is a frequent but understudied adverse effect of several chemotherapy regimens used for the treatment of breast cancer. Taste alterations may arise from direct cytotoxic effects on taste receptor cells, changes in saliva composition, mucosal inflammation, altered signal transduction, or central nervous system effects. These disturbances can lead to reduced food enjoyment, alterations in dietary patterns, and potential deterioration of nutritional and functional status.
Although dysgeusia is commonly reported in clinical practice, estimates of its prevalence vary widely due to heterogeneous methodologies and the predominant reliance on self-reported symptoms rather than standardized sensory testing. Studies that objectively quantify changes in taste recognition thresholds during chemotherapy are limited, and little is known about specific aspects such as umami perception or chemesthetic sensitivity. Furthermore, factors that may predispose individual patients to developing dysgeusia-such as baseline taster status, nutritional condition, or specific treatment characteristics-remain poorly characterized.
This observational pilot study was designed to provide objective, reproducible data on taste function in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. A combination of validated sensory tools, including taste strips and chemesthetic tests, is used to measure changes in taste perception over the course of treatment. Standardized methods were selected to ensure high sensitivity and repeatability and to allow quantitative comparison across different time points.
The study also integrates nutritional assessment and quality-of-life evaluation to explore the broader clinical implications of dysgeusia. Particular attention is given to potential associations between objective taste alterations, patient-reported symptoms, and parameters such as nutritional status, dietary intake, and functional well-being. Given the scarcity of comprehensive, methodologically rigorous studies in this area, the data generated may help clarify the clinical burden of dysgeusia and inform strategies to mitigate its impact on patients undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Cloè Dalla Costa, MD
- Phone Number: +39.0172.1408493
- Email: cdallacosta@aslcn2.it
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosis of non-metastatic breast cancer
- Indication for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy as part of standard clinical practice
- Chemotherapy-naïve patients (no chemotherapy received in the previous 12 months)
- Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Terminal or metastatic disease
- Pre-existing taste or smell disorders (e.g., anosmia, dysgeusia, neurological syndromes, etc.)
- Known allergies to any substances used in taste and chemesthetic function tests (e.g., quinine dihydrochloride, monosodium L-glutamate, capsaicin, etc.)
- Receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy within research protocols
- Lack of signed written informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
This group includes male and female participants diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer who are receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard clinical practice.
All participants are treated at the Oncology Unit of Michele and Pietro Ferrero Hospital in Verduno.
Eligible participants are those for whom chemotherapy is indicated as part of routine care and who are willing and able to complete sensory tests, nutritional assessments, and quality-of-life questionnaires during the study period.
|
Participants will undergo additional procedures as part of the study to assess taste function, nutritional status, and quality of life. These procedures include:
All procedures are non-invasive and performed in addition to the participants' standard chemotherapy treatment. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of dysgeusia during chemotherapy
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after the completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
The primary endpoint is the incidence of dysgeusia after the start of chemotherapy in participants with non-metastatic breast cancer.
Taste perception will be evaluated using standardized taste strips to determine recognition thresholds for four basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter).
Dysgeusia will be considered present if the total taste strip score is lower than 9 at any of the evaluated time points.
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after the completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quantitative changes in taste recognition thresholds
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Quantitative evaluation of recognition thresholds for the five basic tastes (sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami) to assess changes in taste perception during and after chemotherapy.
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Chemesthetic sensitivity assessed by capsaicin strips
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Evaluation of chemesthetic function using strips impregnated with capsaicin at four increasing concentrations to assess oral sensitivity to chemical stimuli.
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Taster status assessment
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Assessment of participants' "taster status" (ability to detect bitter compounds) to evaluate its potential correlation with the subsequent development of dysgeusia.
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Chemotherapy-induced taste alteration (CiTAS) questionnaire
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Evaluation of participant-reported taste alterations using the Chemotherapy-Induced Taste Alteration Scale (CiTAS) and comparison with objective sensory test findings. Score range: 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more severe taste alterations. |
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Nutritional status assessment
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Evaluation of nutritional status using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria and measurement of phase angle using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Caloric and macronutrient intake
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Assessment of caloric and macronutrient intake using 24-hour dietary recall interviews to determine changes during and after chemotherapy.
|
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
|
Quality of life assessment (FACT-G)
Time Frame: - Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Evaluation of quality of life using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The total score is derived by summing scores from four domains (physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being). Each item is scored on a 5-point scale from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). |
- Baseline: within 15 days before the start of chemotherapy - Mid-treatment: approximately 3 months after baseline - End of chemotherapy: within 15 days after completion of chemotherapy - Follow-up: 2 months after the end of chemotherapy
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, Stiassny K, Temmel AF, Hummel T, Kobal G. Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated "taste strips". Rhinology. 2003 Mar;41(1):2-6.
- Buttiron Webber T, Briata IM, DeCensi A, Cevasco I, Paleari L. Taste and Smell Disorders in Cancer Treatment: Results from an Integrative Rapid Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 28;24(3):2538. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032538.
- Sawicki CM, Janal MN, Nicholson SJ, Wu AK, Schmidt BL, Albertson DG. Oral cancer patients experience mechanical and chemical sensitivity at the site of the cancer. BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):1165. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10282-3.
- Turcott JG, Juarez-Hernandez E, De la Torre-Vallejo M, Sanchez-Lara K, Luvian-Morales J, Arrieta O. Value: Changes in the Detection and Recognition Thresholds of Three Basic Tastes in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Cisplatin and Paclitaxel and Its Association with Nutritional and Quality of Life Parameters. Nutr Cancer. 2016;68(2):241-9. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1144075. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
- Epstein JB, de Andrade E Silva SM, Epstein GL, Leal JHS, Barasch A, Smutzer G. Taste disorders following cancer treatment: report of a case series. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4587-4595. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04758-5. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
- Nolden AA, Hwang LD, Boltong A, Reed DR. Chemosensory Changes from Cancer Treatment and Their Effects on Patients' Food Behavior: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 24;11(10):2285. doi: 10.3390/nu11102285.
- Landis BN, Welge-Luessen A, Bramerson A, Bende M, Mueller CA, Nordin S, Hummel T. "Taste Strips" - a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol. 2009 Feb;256(2):242-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0088-y. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
- Mueller CA, Pintscher K, Renner B. Clinical test of gustatory function including umami taste. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Jun;120(6):358-62. doi: 10.1177/000348941112000602.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Neoplasms
- Skin Diseases
- Breast Diseases
- Sensation Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Signs and Symptoms
- Breast Neoplasms
- Dysgeusia
- Taste Disorders
- Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Investigative Techniques
- Epidemiologic Methods
- Data Collection
- Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms
- Quality of Health Care
- Public Health
- Environment and Public Health
- Epidemiologic Measurements
- Nutrition Assessment
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- GustiAmo
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
NCT07378215RecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-Life
-
NCT04239183UnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
NCT02901639UnknownImproving Quality of Life
-
NCT04761367CompletedImprove Quality of Life
-
NCT05722249CompletedProfessional Quality of Life
-
NCT06014671CompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life of
-
NCT01784497CompletedHealth Related Quality of Life
-
NCT01269489UnknownHealth-related Quality of Life
-
NCT01247636CompletedHealth-Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Taste Assessment / Nutritional Assessment / Quality of Life Assessment
-
NCT00044980Completed
-
NCT04454086CompletedObesity | Overweight | Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT04596384Active, not recruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Digestive System Carcinoma | Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm | Genitourinary System Carcinoma
-
NCT03757949Active, not recruiting
-
NCT01080521CompletedOvarian Clear Cell Cystadenocarcinoma | Ovarian Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma | Ovarian Seromucinous Carcinoma | Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma | Stage IV Ovarian Germ Cell Tumor | Ovarian Sarcoma | Malignant Ovarian Epithelial Tumor | Ovarian Carcinosarcoma | Ovarian Brenner Tumor | Ovarian Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma
-
NCT01506440CompletedUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific | Malignant Neoplasm
-
NCT00037024CompletedDepression | Breast Cancer | Fatigue | Malnutrition | Prostate Cancer | Psychosocial Effects of Cancer and Its Treatment
-
NCT03902535CompletedStage IVA Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Lung Carcinoma | Stage IV Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Head and Neck Carcinoma | Lung Carcinoma | Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Lung Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Lung Cancer AJCC v8
-
NCT01843413Active, not recruitingUnspecified Adult Solid Tumor | Tumors Metastatic to Brain
-
NCT02054741CompletedLymphoma | Toxicity | Adult Solid Neoplasm