A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of JAK Inhibitors Versus Calcineurin Inhibitors as Initial Therapy for Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Antisynthetase Syndrome (JAKCNIASSILD)

May 31, 2026 updated by: Qinghong Liu, China-Japan Friendship Hospital
This study is a prospective investigation comparing the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors versus calcineurin inhibitors as initial therapy for interstitial lung disease associated with antisynthetase syndrome. The goal is to determine which treatment is more effective at improving lung function and preventing disease progression, while comparing their safety profiles. The findings will help provide clearer treatment guidance for doctors and patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, prospective study. Eligible adults with interstitial lung disease associated with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS-ILD) who are treatment-naïve will be randomly assigned to receive either a JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, or baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or upadacitinib 15 mg once daily) or a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, or cyclosporine 2-5 mg/kg/day in two divided doses), both in combination with a standard glucocorticoid regimen. The primary endpoint is the 12-month survival rate. Secondary endpoints include changes in lung function, high-resolution CT (HRCT) scores, glucocorticoid dosage reduction, and the proportion of patients achieving low disease activity. Safety and laboratory parameters will be closely monitored throughout the 12-month treatment and follow-up period. Statistical analyses will compare the efficacy and safety profiles between the two treatment arms, and subgroup analyses will be performed to explore potential predictors of treatment response.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100029
        • Recruiting
        • China-Japan Friendship Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years.
  • Meet the 2017 EULAR/ACR diagnostic criteria for Anti-synthetase Syndrome (ASS).
  • Presence of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) confirmed by High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT).
  • Active disease requiring initiation or intensification of immunosuppressive therapy, with no prior use of glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, or biologics.
  • Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Rapidly Progressive ILD (RP-ILD), defined as worsening dyspnea within 1 month and PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 250 mmHg.
  • Active uncontrolled severe infection, malignancy, or major organ failure.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Contraindications to the study drugs.
  • Concurrent use of other immunosuppressants or biologics.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: JAK inhibitor group
Participants in this arm will receive one of the JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, or baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or upadacitinib 15 mg once daily) in combination with a standard glucocorticoid regimen (methylprednisolone 0.5g IV for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone 0.8-1.0 mg/kg/day tapered to 7.5 mg/day over 12 months). Treatment duration is 12 months.
Drug: JAK Inhibitor
Oral JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily, or baricitinib 4 mg once daily, or upadacitinib 15 mg once daily) administered in combination with standard glucocorticoid therapy for 12 months.
Experimental: Calcineurin inhibitor group
Participants in this arm will receive either tacrolimus (0.075 mg/kg/day in two divided doses) or cyclosporine (2-5 mg/kg/day in two divided doses) in combination with the same standard glucocorticoid regimen as the experimental group. Treatment duration is 12 months.
Drug: Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNI)
Oral calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg/day in two divided doses, or cyclosporine 2-5 mg/kg/day in two divided doses) administered in combination with standard glucocorticoid therapy for 12 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
12-month survival rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of participants surviving at 12 months after randomization, with survival defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annual decline rate of lung function (FVC% and DLCO%)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
The annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC% predicted) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO% predicted), calculated as the change from baseline to 12 months.
Change from baseline to 12 months
Change in HRCT score
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 months
Change in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) score from baseline to 12 months, assessed using a standardized scoring system.
Change from baseline to 12 months
Rate of glucocorticoid tapering
Time Frame: Over 12 months
The rate of glucocorticoid dose reduction over 12 months, calculated as the time to achieve prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day or the cumulative glucocorticoid dose.
Over 12 months
Proportion of patients achieving low disease activity (LDA)
Time Frame: At 6 months and 12 months
Proportion of participants achieving low disease activity (LDA) at 6 and 12 months, defined as meeting all of the following criteria: no active arthritis without regular NSAID use; no active myositis with serum creatine kinase ≤ upper limit of normal; stable ILD with no decline in pulmonary function (FVC decline <5% and DLCO decline <10% in the past 6 months); no fever or other systemic manifestations with ESR <20 mm/h; stable glucocorticoid dose ≤7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) for at least 3 months.
At 6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 18, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JAKCNIASSILD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings