Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic (vNOTE) Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Suspension (VENUS)
As the adoption of Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) expands, attention is shifting from feasibility studies to the refinement of surgical steps that optimize long-term pelvic health.
One technical distinction between vNOTES hysterectomy and conventional laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is the routine early transection of the uterosacral ligaments as the approach is caudal-cephalic. These ligaments are not merely anatomic landmarks-they are the primary apical support structures of the vagina, anchoring the vaginal cuff to the sacrum and providing resistance against downward displacement. Disruption of this support can predispose patients to apical vaginal prolapse, a condition that significantly affects quality of life and may require complex reconstructive surgery.
Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is a well-established, effective method of restoring apical support at the time of hysterectomy. Incorporating uterosacral suspension into vNOTES hysterectomy is a logical evolution toward ensuring that minimally invasive innovation does not come at the expense of long-term pelvic health. By adapting and standardizing this reconstructive step for vNOTES, surgeons can maintain apical support, reduce future prolapse risk, and uphold the same quality benchmarks established in laparoscopic and vaginal surgery.
OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS:
This study aims to present a practical, reproducible technique for performing USLS in the vNOTES setting and to evaluate its potential immediate benefits, possible complication rates, and additional operative time compared with vNOTES hysterectomy without USLS. In doing so, we seek to demonstrate that preventive pelvic support can be seamlessly integrated without compromising the efficiency or advantages of the transvaginal endoscopic approach.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE:
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique that combines the advantages of laparoscopy with a natural orifice approach, eliminating the need for abdominal incisions. By accessing the peritoneal cavity via the vagina, vNOTES offers benefits such as reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, fewer wound-related complications, and improved cosmetic outcomes. Over the past decade, it has been successfully applied to a broad spectrum of gynecologic procedures, including adnexal surgery and hysterectomy, with growing evidence supporting its safety and feasibility in both benign and complex cases. As the adoption of vNOTES expands, attention is shifting from feasibility studies to the refinement of surgical steps that optimize long-term pelvic health.
One technical distinction between vNOTES hysterectomy and conventional laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy is the routine early transection of the uterosacral ligaments as the approach is caudal-cephalic. These ligaments are not merely anatomic landmarks-they are the primary apical support structures of the vagina, anchoring the vaginal cuff to the sacrum and providing resistance against downward displacement. Disruption of this support can predispose patients to apical vaginal prolapse, a condition that significantly affects quality of life and may require complex reconstructive surgery. In traditional vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy, preserving or reconstructing apical support is considered standard of care to minimize this risk.
Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is a well-established, effective method of restoring apical support at the time of hysterectomy. Multiple randomized and observational studies have demonstrated that performing USLS prophylactically can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative vault prolapse, aligning with pelvic reconstructive principles and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations. Beyond prevention, USLS also improves pelvic floor function, reduces the need for future surgery, and preserves vaginal axis and length. Its application in minimally invasive hysterectomy is now routine in many centers, yet in vNOTES procedures, this important step has not been widely integrated.
Incorporating uterosacral suspension into vNOTES hysterectomy is a logical evolution toward ensuring that minimally invasive innovation does not come at the expense of long-term pelvic health. By adapting and standardizing this reconstructive step for vNOTES, surgeons can maintain apical support, reduce future prolapse risk, and uphold the same quality benchmarks established in laparoscopic and vaginal surgery.
- OBJECTIVE AND HYPOTHESIS:
This study aims to present a practical, reproducible technique for performing USLS in the vNOTES setting and to evaluate its potential immediate benefits, possible complication rates, and additional operative time compared with vNOTES hysterectomy without USLS. In doing so, we seek to demonstrate that preventive pelvic support can be seamlessly integrated without compromising the efficiency or advantages of the transvaginal endoscopic approach.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Aya Mohr Sasson, MD
- Phone Number: 346-270-4682
- Email: aya.mohrsasson@uth.tmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- University of Texas
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age>18
- All women undergoing vNOTES hysterectomy ± Bilateral salpingectomy/salpingo-oopherectomy for benign gynecological indication
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion for vNOTES surgery: pelvic inflammatory disease, previous rectal surgery, suspected malignancy, radiation
- Indication for surgery: elvic prolapse
- Other surgical interventions planned for the procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Hysterectomy by vNOTES approach followed by uterosacral suspension
Two suspension sutures will be placed on the uterosacral ligament on each side after the completion of the hysterectomy
|
Placement of two suspension sutures on the uterosacral ligament on each side
Hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy performed by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Hysterectomy by vNOTES approach
No additional intervention will be done following hysterectomy
|
Hysterectomy with or without adnexectomy performed by vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Vaginal length difference (Delta)
Time Frame: From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
The calculated difference in total vaginal length before minus after surgery, evaluated by hysterometer
|
From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgery length
Time Frame: From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
Surgical length in minutes
|
From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
Evaluated as a compound parameter including: Excessive bleeding (>500 cc), damage to adjacent organ (bladder, bowel, great vessel), change in surgical approach
|
From intubating to extubating the patient during surgery
|
|
Visual analog scale (VAS) score
Time Frame: From immediately after surgery in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) until postoperative day 1 (POD1)
|
Pain will be assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 1 to 10, where 1 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
|
From immediately after surgery in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) until postoperative day 1 (POD1)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: A systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020 Jan;43(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
- Martins SB, Castro RA, Takano CC, Marquini GV, Oliveira LM, Martins Junior PCF, Dias MM, Girao MJBC, Sartori MGF. Efficacy of Sacrospinous Fixation or Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Stages III and IV: Randomized Clinical Trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;45(10):e584-e593. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772592. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
- Manodoro S, Frigerio M, Milani R, Spelzini F. Tips and tricks for uterosacral ligament suspension: how to avoid ureteral injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):161-163. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3497-y. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
- Aronson MP, Aronson PK, Howard AE, Morse AN, Baker SP, Young SB. Low risk of ureteral obstruction with "deep" (dorsal/posterior) uterosacral ligament suture placement for transvaginal apical suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.608.
- Altman D, Falconer C, Cnattingius S, Granath F. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;198(5):572.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
- Lerner VT, May G, Iglesia CB. Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Revolution: The Next Frontier in Gynecologic Minimally Invasive Surgery. JSLS. 2023 Jan-Mar;27(1):e2022.00082. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00082.
- Housmans S, Noori N, Kapurubandara S, Bosteels JJA, Cattani L, Alkatout I, Deprest J, Baekelandt J. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) Compared to Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications. J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 7;9(12):3959. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123959.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-25-0000
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hysterectomy
-
NCT07539558CompletedHysterectomy (MeSH nr: E04.950.300.399) | Had Undergone a Hysterectomy | Had Not Been Diagnosed With Cancer | After Hysterectomy
-
NCT04886791RecruitingHysterectomy | Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery | Vaginal Hysterectomy
-
NCT04366375CompletedAbdominal Hysterectomy | Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
-
NCT05659303Completed
-
NCT02669537Withdrawn
-
NCT03503175Unknown
-
NCT02496130Completed
-
NCT02998658Unknown
Clinical Trials on Uterosacral suspension
-
NCT04172896UnknownVaginal Vault Prolapse | Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse | Prolapse, Vaginal
-
NCT01364025UnknownProlapse of Vaginal Vault After Hysterectomy
-
NCT07552337Completed
-
NCT06792331CompletedVaginal Vault Prolapse | Pelvic Floor Prolapse
-
NCT01802281CompletedUterovaginal Prolapse
-
NCT06418438Not yet recruiting
-
NCT05668130Not yet recruiting
-
NCT02800512Active, not recruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Cystocele | Rectocele | Enterocele