Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse

February 21, 2020 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse (PULS)

Is routine uterosacral ligament suspension an appropriate clinical adjunct at the time of hysterectomy?

The answers to these questions will facilitate the treatment of many American women. With the results of this study, the investigators would anticipate a reduction in the number of surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. In addition, if uterosacral ligament suspension was shown to be ineffective, it would not be used routinely in the setting of hysterectomy and women will be spared the additional procedure and possibility of side effects or complications.

The relative risks and benefits of adding a prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy in women without symptomatic prolapse symptoms have never been studied prospectively.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92110
        • Kaiser Permanente San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligibility for primary procedure (hysterectomy either total or supracervical, performed either vaginally or abdominally, via laparoscopic or open approach)
  • Eligibility for secondary procedure (uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy)
  • Prolapse in any compartment not extending beyond the hymen as measured by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative system
  • No subjective complaints of Pelvic Organ Prolapse as determined by answer "no" to questions #3 of the short form of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory: #3. Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area?

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication for uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy. (Surgeon's judgment that a contraindication to uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy exists).
  • Anticipated geographic relocation within the 12 months after surgery
  • Inability to provide informed consent or to complete testing or data collection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: uterosacral ligament suspension
uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy sutures will be placed bilaterally at the time of hysterectomy
Uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral
Other Names:
  • uterosacral ligament suspension at the time of hysterectomy
No Intervention: hysterectomy alone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare the occurrence of objective findings of pelvic organ prolapse beyond hymen after uterosacral ligament suspension of the vaginal apex at the time of hysterectomy vs. hysterectomy alone using Pelvic Floor Quantitative Examination
Time Frame: one year and annual thereafter for 5 years
one year and annual thereafter for 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marianna Alperin, MD, Kaiser Permanente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 21, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PULS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prolapse of Vaginal Vault After Hysterectomy

Clinical Trials on uterosacral ligament suspension colpopexy bilateral

Subscribe