CGM-Guided Acarbose for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

February 27, 2026 updated by: Saima Abass Tahammal, Shifa International Hospital
This Phase II pragmatic hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial tests whether acarbose, titrated using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to blunt post-prandial excursions, reduces 4-week pain area-under-the-curve (AUC) versus placebo in adults with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and high glycemic variability. Secondary objectives assess CGM variability metrics, microvascular reactivity, inflammatory markers, safety, and feasibility of a pharmacist-led titration workflow using loaner CGMs across multi-region community clinics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Adults with T2D, painful DPN, and high CGM variability (e.g., MAGE >50 mg/dL on run-in) are randomized 1:1 to acarbose vs matching placebo for 4 weeks, on stable background analgesics. A standardized pharmacist-led algorithm escalates acarbose to target post-prandial spikes, guided by blinded CGM trend review. The primary endpoint is 4-week daily pain AUC captured via ePRO. Key secondary endpoints include changes in MAGE and time-in-range (TIR), skin microvascular reactivity (laser speckle), serum IL-6, patient global impression of change, rescue-analgesic use, and adverse events. Implementation outcomes (acceptability, feasibility, adoption, cost) are collected to inform scale-up in HIC and LMIC community settings.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
170

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Pakistan
      • Lahore, Pakistan
        • Shifa International Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  • Age 18-75 years.
  • Type 2 diabetes ≥1 year; HbA1c 7.0-10.0% within 8 weeks of randomization.
  • Painful DPN meeting clinical criteria; average daily pain NRS ≥4 during run-in.
  • High CGM variability on 7-10 day run-in (e.g., MAGE >50 mg/dL).
  • Stable analgesic regimen ≥4 weeks pre-baseline.
  • Able to use CGM and ePRO; provides informed consent.

Exclusion:

  • Type 1 diabetes; non-diabetic neuropathies.
  • Contraindications to acarbose (e.g., chronic intestinal malabsorption, inflammatory bowel disease).
  • eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m²; significant hepatic disease (ALT/AST >3× ULN).
  • Use of α-glucosidase inhibitors within 3 months.
  • Recent change (<3 months) in GLP-1/GIP agonists, SGLT2i, or basal/bolus insulin strategy.
  • Pregnancy/lactation; other conditions compromising safety/assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm A

Acarbose with meals; pharmacist-led titration (e.g., 50 mg TID → up to 100 mg TID as tolerated) to curb post-prandial excursions based on CGM review.

Background analgesics held stable.
Drug: Acarbose 50 mg
Acarbose with meals; pharmacist-led titration (e.g., 50 mg TID → up to 100 mg TID as tolerated)
Placebo Comparator: Arm B
Matching placebo; identical titration schedule. Background analgesics held stable.
Drug: Placebo
Matching placebo; identical titration schedule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CGM MAGE (mg/dL)
Time Frame: baseline→Week 4
CGM MAGE (mg/dL)
baseline→Week 4
Daily pain AUC
Time Frame: baseline→Week 4
Daily pain AUC (ePRO; 0-10 NRS). Method: trapezoidal AUC of daily NRS scores; higher AUC = worse pain. Daily pain area under the curve derived from the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS). The NRS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate worse pain. AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal method from daily NRS scores over the assessment period. Higher AUC values indicate greater overall pain burden.
baseline→Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CGM Time-in-Range (70-180 mg/dL, %)
Time Frame: baseline→Week 4
CGM Time-in-Range (70-180 mg/dL, %)
baseline→Week 4
Skin microvascular reactivity
Time Frame: baseline→Week 4
Skin microvascular reactivity by laser speckle contrast imaging
baseline→Week 4
Serum IL-6
Time Frame: baseline→Week 4
Serum IL-6 (pg/mL)
baseline→Week 4
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Week 4
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) assessed on a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse. Lower scores indicate improvement; higher scores indicate worsening.
Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shifa International Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 22, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SH-34988983

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study, including the analyzable dataset and data dictionary, will be made available.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning 6 months after publication and for up to 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request following publication of the primary results. Requests must include a scientifically sound proposal and statistical analysis plan. Access will require approval by the sponsor and execution of a data use agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings