Hold-relax and Muscle Energy Techniques in Patients With Post-traumatic Knee Stiffness
Comparative Effects of Hold-relax and Muscle Energy Techniques on Pain, Range of Motion and Lower Extremity Function in Patients With Post-traumatic Knee Stiffness
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Punjab Province
-
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
- Naseer Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who had fracture and treated either with POP or ORIF.
- Fracture healing completed.
- Both genders of age between 18-35.
- Conservative treatment of fracture with POP for minimum 6 weeks.
- NPRS more than or equal to 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pathological fracture.
- Post-traumatic myositis ossificans.
- Ligamental or Meniscal tears.
- Any tumor in the knee region.
- Osteoarthritis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hold-Relax Technique
|
Hold-Relax: Patient was in prone position, therapist was on the affected site, the affected knee was bent to the available and pain free range at that range therapist applied pressure and held it for 8-10 seconds repeated for 10 times.
3 sessions per week for a total of 8 weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Muscle Energy Technique
|
Muscle Energy Technique: Patient was in prone position, therapist was on the affected site, the affected knee was bent to the available and pain free range at that range therapist applied pressure and asked the patient to move his knee in extension against the resistance applied by therapist for 10 seconds.
And then patient flexed his knee actively and process was repeated for 10 times.
3 sessions per week for a total of 8 weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a subjective measure using which patient's rate their pain.
It consists of 11 points, having an overall score ranging from 0 to 10, where: 0, 1 - 3, 4 - 6, 7 - 10 represents no pain, mild, moderate and the most severe pain respectively
|
From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
|
Universal Goniometer
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
Range of motion of joints are usually assessed by a device known as universal goniometer.
meter has two arms stationary as well as movable arm.
The Centre of the goniometer is known as fulcrum.
Through goniometer in each plane joint ranges are measured.
|
From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
|
Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire assessing functionality in patients with knee and other lower limb disorders.
Patients rate their difficulty with activities on a 0-4 scale (0=extreme difficulty/unable, 4=no difficulty), with a total score out of 80; higher scores indicate better function.
|
From enrollment to the end of the treatment at 8 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ali Raza, MS-OMPT, Riphah International University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Balasundaram AP, Sreerama Rajan S. Short-term effects of mobilisation with movement in patients with post-traumatic stiffness of the knee joint. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):498-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
- Khan T, Rizvi MR, Sharma A, Ahmad F, Hasan S, Uddin S, Sidiq M, Ammari A, Iqbal A, Alghadir AH. Assessing muscle energy technique and foam roller self-myofascial release for low back pain management in two-wheeler riders. Sci Rep. 2024 May 27;14(1):12144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62881-8.
- Nazary-Moghadam S, Yahya-Zadeh A, Zare MA, Ali Mohammadi M, Marouzi P, Zeinalzadeh A. Comparison of utilizing modified hold-relax, muscle energy technique, and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on hamstring muscle length in healthy athletes: Randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jul;35:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.04.079. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
- Bhosale P, Kolke Pt S. Effectiveness of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and muscle energy technique (MET) on post-operative elbow stiffness: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2023 Oct;31(5):340-348. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2022.2122372. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
- Moradi MR. The effect of a muscle energy session on increasing knee extension in People with shortness of knee posterior muscles. National University. 2020
- Xu L, Li J, Sheng Q, Wang G. Clinical Application of Muscle Energy Technique for Knee Function Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Pain Res. 2025 Oct 14;18:5409-5416. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S537482. eCollection 2025.
- Valenza MC, Torres-Sanchez I, Cabrera-Martos I, Valenza-Demet G, Cano-Cappellacci M. Acute Effects of Contract-Relax Stretching vs. TENS in Young Subjects With Anterior Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Aug;30(8):2271-8. doi: 10.1097/JSC.0000000000000215.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- REC/RCR & AHS/24/01103
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knee Discomfort
-
NCT04420091Completed
-
NCT06650670Terminated
-
NCT04752761RecruitingKnee Discomfort | Approach-Approach Conflict
-
NCT05060536RecruitingArthroplasty Complications | Knee Discomfort
-
NCT07494838Not yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Knee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic | Knee Swelling Pain
-
NCT06569836RecruitingKnee Discomfort | Knee Pain Chronic
-
NCT02157701CompletedKnee Discomfort | Pain Physical Activity
-
NCT05824676Not yet recruitingTrauma | Knee Cap | Knee Discomfort | Knee Deformity | Patella Fracture | Knee Cap Injury
Clinical Trials on Hold-Relax Technique
-
NCT06943079CompletedSports Physical Therapy
-
NCT06437327Recruiting
-
NCT05379998Completed
-
NCT07588087Recruiting
-
NCT07103512Recruiting
-
NCT07403409CompletedAdhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
-
NCT06198036Completed
-
NCT05356663Recruiting
-
NCT05370378Completed
-
NCT05460949Recruiting