Research on Post-Stroke Anticoagulation Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation Based on Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity Measured by Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE)

February 23, 2026 updated by: Changhai Hospital
  1. Study Purpose The primary aim of this research was to systematically describe and characterize a novel, thrombus-mimicking artifact observed during Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE), termed the "Floating Lotus" sign. The study sought to define its imaging features, determine its prevalence, and identify the clinical factors that predict its occurrence. This was driven by the clinical need to prevent the misdiagnosis of this pseudo-thrombus as a true Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) thrombus, which could lead to unnecessary procedure cancellations or anticoagulation changes.
  2. Study Population The study population consisted of 172 consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent ICE-guided catheter ablation and/or left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) between January and December 2024 across three tertiary medical centers. Patients with confirmed intracardiac thrombus, significant valvular heart disease, or prior cardiac surgery were excluded.
  3. Key Research Focus

The key research focus was a multi-faceted investigation of the "Floating Lotus" sign:

Incidence and Imaging Characterization: To quantify how common this sign is (found in 27.9% of patients) and meticulously describe its dynamic sonographic appearance-a mobile, echogenic mass within an anechoic space (pericardial effusion) that merges with the LAA wall upon catheter rotation.

Identification of Clinical Predictors: To analyze which patient factors are associated with the sign. The study identified heart failure (LVEF <55%) as the sole independent predictor through multivariable analysis.

Clinical Correlation and Differentiation: To examine the sign's association with other clinical parameters (e.g., recent stroke, larger left atrial diameter) and emphasize the critical imaging maneuver (catheter rotation) that differentiates it from a true LAA thrombus, thereby highlighting its direct implications for procedural safety and decision-making.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
172

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200433
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital)
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200438
        • Shanghai Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population was derived from patients with atrial fibrillation who consecutively underwent intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided catheter ablation and/or left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) between January and December 2024 at three tertiary medical centers in China.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent).
  • Completion of complete intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) imaging during the catheter ablation or left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed intracardiac thrombus on pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or left atrial computed tomography angiography (CTA).
  • Significant valvular heart disease (moderate or severe stenosis/regurgitation) or a history of cardiac surgery.
  • Incomplete clinical or imaging data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of the "Floating Lotus" Sign
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Independent Predictors of the "Floating Lotus" Sign
Time Frame: Preoperative baseline
Preoperative baseline
Determinants of Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Emptying Velocity
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
Shanghai Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2024XC108

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We plan to share fully de-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the primary publication of this study. This includes:

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics; Procedural echocardiographic parameters ; These data will be made available upon reasonable request to researchers whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee for legitimate scientific purposes. Data will be shared after the publication of the primary results, typically within 12 months. Data access requires a signed data use agreement to ensure compliance with ethical and privacy regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available starting 12 months after publication of the primary results, for a duration of 12 months.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access granted only to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Only de identified participant-leveldata will be shared. Requests are subject to sponsor approval.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Clinical Trials on Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) for Differential Diagnosis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings