AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making for Pancreatic Diseases

February 23, 2026 updated by: Changhai Hospital

A Multicenter Clinical Study on AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making Management for Pancreatic Diseases Using Contrast-Enhanced CT

This multicenter clinical trial evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to assist in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. Using contrast-enhanced CT scans, the study compares the AI's recommendations against the decisions of experienced clinicians to verify the system's accuracy and safety in a real-world setting. Patients are categorized into three management groups: Intervention (surgery/treatment), Intensive Surveillance (close monitoring), or Routine Surveillance (standard follow-up). The primary goal is to determine if the AI system can reliably classify patients, reduce the risk of missing malignant lesions, and prevent unnecessary surgeries, thereby improving clinical decision-making for pancreatic conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

MEHTOD： This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the reliability and effectiveness of an AI system for patients with pancreatic diseases in a real-world clinical environment. The study calculates the AI system's classification accuracy using pathological diagnosis (biopsy/surgery results) or long-term follow-up as the "gold standard" for comparison. Additionally, the safety and clinical utility of the management strategies recommended by the AI are assessed by measuring the risk of missing malignant lesions, the rate of unnecessary surgeries for pancreatic diseases, and the level of agreement with traditional clinical decisions.

STUDY DESIGN

All contrast-enhanced CT images from patients with pancreatic diseases are analyzed by the AI system to generate a classification result (Intervention, Intensive Surveillance, or Routine Surveillance). Simultaneously, clinical doctors review the same data and categorize patients into these three groups to determine their actual care plan:

  1. INTERVENTION: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intervention" are recommended for further surgical evaluation or treatment.
  2. INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intensive Surveillance" receive a personalized, high-frequency follow-up plan until the study endpoint.
  3. ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Routine Surveillance" undergo follow-up for at least one year. If abnormalities arise during this period, the patient is transferred to the appropriate "Intervention" or "Intensive Surveillance" protocol.

OUTCOMES： The study compares the performance of the AI system against clinical doctors regarding classification accuracy, the risk of missed diagnoses, unnecessary surgery rates, and decision consistency. These metrics are used to validate the AI system's value, safety, and utility in the clinical management of pancreatic diseases.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Recruiting
        • Changhai Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study enrolls patients with clinically suspected pancreatic disease who have available contrast-enhanced CT scans and provide informed consent. Patients are excluded if they have a history of pancreatic surgery, contraindications to contrast media, suboptimal image quality, or other conditions deemed unsuitable by the investigator (e.g., pregnancy, cognitive impairment, or concurrent trial participation).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically suspected pancreatic disease.
  • Scheduled to undergo contrast-enhanced CT.
  • Signed informed consent form indicating agreement to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of pancreatic surgery.
  • Contraindications to contrast-enhanced CT, including known hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media or severe renal/hepatic dysfunction.
  • Suboptimal image quality affecting diagnosis.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Unsuitability for participation as determined by the investigator, including but not limited to: pregnancy or lactation, severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment, significant comorbidities that may interfere with study results or patient safety.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
AI group
Diagnosis by Artificial Intelligence model
Diagnostic test: Diagnosis by Artificial Intelligence model
To develop an artificial intelligence-based classification management system for pancreatic diseases, achieving automated and precise classification. Contrast-enhanced CT images from all study subjects will be analyzed by the AI system to generate classification results, categorizing patients into three groups: INTERVENTIOM, INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE or ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE.
Clinicians group
Diagnosis by clinicians

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Classification accuracy
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The percentage of cases correctly classified by AI out of the total number of cases.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement rate with clinical decisions
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The proportion of total cases where AI and clinician classification results are in agreement.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
Percentage decrease in unnecessary surgical procedures
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The percentage reduction in the unnecessary surgery rate achieved by AI decision-making compared to traditional decision-making.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
Malignancy miss rate
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The proportion of cases classified by AI as non-surgical that actually required surgery.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Shengjing Hospital
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
The Affiliated People's Hospital of Ningbo University
Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital Tongji University
The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University
Shanghai Fudan University Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Prospective PRISM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings