AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making for Pancreatic Diseases

February 23, 2026 updated by: Changhai Hospital

A Multicenter Clinical Study on AI-Powered Precision Decision-Making Management for Pancreatic Diseases Using Contrast-Enhanced CT

This multicenter clinical trial evaluates an artificial intelligence (AI) system designed to assist in the diagnosis and management of pancreatic diseases. Using contrast-enhanced CT scans, the study compares the AI's recommendations against the decisions of experienced clinicians to verify the system's accuracy and safety in a real-world setting. Patients are categorized into three management groups: Intervention (surgery/treatment), Intensive Surveillance (close monitoring), or Routine Surveillance (standard follow-up). The primary goal is to determine if the AI system can reliably classify patients, reduce the risk of missing malignant lesions, and prevent unnecessary surgeries, thereby improving clinical decision-making for pancreatic conditions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

MEHTOD: This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the reliability and effectiveness of an AI system for patients with pancreatic diseases in a real-world clinical environment. The study calculates the AI system's classification accuracy using pathological diagnosis (biopsy/surgery results) or long-term follow-up as the "gold standard" for comparison. Additionally, the safety and clinical utility of the management strategies recommended by the AI are assessed by measuring the risk of missing malignant lesions, the rate of unnecessary surgeries for pancreatic diseases, and the level of agreement with traditional clinical decisions.

STUDY DESIGN

All contrast-enhanced CT images from patients with pancreatic diseases are analyzed by the AI system to generate a classification result (Intervention, Intensive Surveillance, or Routine Surveillance). Simultaneously, clinical doctors review the same data and categorize patients into these three groups to determine their actual care plan:

  1. INTERVENTION: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intervention" are recommended for further surgical evaluation or treatment.
  2. INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Intensive Surveillance" receive a personalized, high-frequency follow-up plan until the study endpoint.
  3. ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE: Patients assessed by doctors as needing "Routine Surveillance" undergo follow-up for at least one year. If abnormalities arise during this period, the patient is transferred to the appropriate "Intervention" or "Intensive Surveillance" protocol.

OUTCOMES: The study compares the performance of the AI system against clinical doctors regarding classification accuracy, the risk of missed diagnoses, unnecessary surgery rates, and decision consistency. These metrics are used to validate the AI system's value, safety, and utility in the clinical management of pancreatic diseases.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Recruiting
        • Changhai Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study enrolls patients with clinically suspected pancreatic disease who have available contrast-enhanced CT scans and provide informed consent. Patients are excluded if they have a history of pancreatic surgery, contraindications to contrast media, suboptimal image quality, or other conditions deemed unsuitable by the investigator (e.g., pregnancy, cognitive impairment, or concurrent trial participation).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically suspected pancreatic disease.
  • Scheduled to undergo contrast-enhanced CT.
  • Signed informed consent form indicating agreement to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of pancreatic surgery.
  • Contraindications to contrast-enhanced CT, including known hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media or severe renal/hepatic dysfunction.
  • Suboptimal image quality affecting diagnosis.
  • Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial.
  • Unsuitability for participation as determined by the investigator, including but not limited to: pregnancy or lactation, severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment, significant comorbidities that may interfere with study results or patient safety.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
AI group
Diagnosis by Artificial Intelligence model
To develop an artificial intelligence-based classification management system for pancreatic diseases, achieving automated and precise classification. Contrast-enhanced CT images from all study subjects will be analyzed by the AI system to generate classification results, categorizing patients into three groups: INTERVENTIOM, INTENSIVE SURVEILLANCE or ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE.
Clinicians group
Diagnosis by clinicians

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Classification accuracy
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The percentage of cases correctly classified by AI out of the total number of cases.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement rate with clinical decisions
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The proportion of total cases where AI and clinician classification results are in agreement.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
Percentage decrease in unnecessary surgical procedures
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The percentage reduction in the unnecessary surgery rate achieved by AI decision-making compared to traditional decision-making.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
Malignancy miss rate
Time Frame: From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year
The proportion of cases classified by AI as non-surgical that actually required surgery.
From date of contrast-enhanced CT scan to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Diagnosis by Artificial Intelligence model

Subscribe