Veterans Affairs Pharmacist Heart Failure Medication Titration Project 2 (PHARM-HF-2)

March 5, 2026 updated by: Alexander Sandhu, Stanford University

Nurse or pharmacist led GDMT management programs have been shown to effectively increase GDMT rates. The Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) has a pharmacist-based HF remote management program that uses an online, real-time, patient dashboard to optimize HF therapy. However, only a minority of VHA patients with recent-onset HF received HF care from pharmacists, with many of the encounters being limited to monitoring and education. Expanding the pharmacist program is a goal, but how to successfully implement this is unclear.

The PHARM-HF-2 Project is a multi-site pragmatic randomized quality improvement project that evaluates two different interventions. First, the project evaluates if education and feedback messages increase the frequency of pharmacist HF medication management compared with education alone. Second, the project evaluates if primary care nudges to refer patients with heart failure to pharmacy care increase the frequency of pharmacist HF medication management compared with usual care.

PHARM-HF-2 is a cluster randomized project at the level of the clinical site in a stepped wedge design. A total of 22 VHA sites will be randomized to different time points at which they begin receiving the intervention. In the initial phase, all sites will receive education only. At intervals of 2 months, 4 sites will transition from education only to audit and feedback with education in a randomized order. By the end of the project, all sites will be receiving the monthly audit and feedback intervention.

The second implementation strategy is nested within the primary strategy among sites randomized to education and feedback. Primary care referral nudges will studied with a two-arm parallel design with randomization at the level of the primary care team (PACT team) with 1:1 allocation stratified by site. This nested evaluation will start four months into the study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Healthcare System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary care pharmacist within one of three VA regions (6, 10, and 19)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Site declined

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Education Only
Pharmacists practicing at sites randomized to Education Only
Other: Education Only
Pharmacists will be informed regarding the educational material on a VHA Sharepoint site. The educational information will include suggested titration protocols, education about heart failure medications, a frequently asked questions document, guideline documents, patient educational material, and recordings of Teams webinars on heart failure management. The pharmacists will be invited to a regular webinar regarding heart failure medication management.
Experimental: Education and Feedback (E+F) without Primary Care Referral Nudges
Pharmacists practicing at sites randomized to education and feedback but not primary care referral nudges in the nested implementation strategy.
Other: Education and Feedback (E+F)
Primary care pharmacists with a heart failure action within the last year will receive a monthly Teams message. The monthly Teams message will contain information including their heart failure medication actions over the prior 3 month period. This data will be obtained from VHA pharmacy data. The message will also include reminders regarding the monthly educational sessions and access to the educational sharepoint. They will also receive a Teams calendar hold for the monthly educational meeting.
Experimental: Education and Feedback (E+F) with Primary Care Referral Nudges
Pharmacists practicing at sites randomized to education and feedback and the primary care referral nudges in the nested implementation strategy.
Other: Education and Feedback (E+F)
Primary care pharmacists with a heart failure action within the last year will receive a monthly Teams message. The monthly Teams message will contain information including their heart failure medication actions over the prior 3 month period. This data will be obtained from VHA pharmacy data. The message will also include reminders regarding the monthly educational sessions and access to the educational sharepoint. They will also receive a Teams calendar hold for the monthly educational meeting.
Other: Primary Care Referral Nudges
Primary care clinicians will receive a weekly email that lists potential patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with upcoming clinic visits that are not on optimal medication therapy. The message will suggest referral to PACT pharmacists for medication optimization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Monthly heart failure medication adjustment encounters
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of encounters in which pharmacist adjusted heart failure medications
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacist Heart Failure Encounters
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of encounters in which pharmacist documented heart failure care
Up to 12 months
Guideline medical therapy score
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Composite score of heart failure medical therapy among patients with heart failure for patients within each pharmacists panel (Score range 0-18 with higher scores indicating higher amounts of medical therapy)
At 12 months follow-up
Beta-blocker therapy
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Percentage of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in each pharmacist panel that are treated with beta-blocker therapy
At 12 months follow-up
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) therapy
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Percentage of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in each pharmacist panel that are treated with RASI therapy
At 12 months follow-up
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Percentage of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in each pharmacist panel that are treated with ARNI therapy
At 12 months follow-up
Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Percentage of patients with heart failure in each pharmacist panel that are treated with MRA therapy
At 12 months follow-up
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy
Time Frame: At 12 months follow-up
Percentage of patients with heart failure in each pharmacist panel that are treated with SGLT2i therapy
At 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 67031

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings