Is Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid a Biologic Alternative for Alveolar Ridge Preservation?
Is Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid a Biologic Alternative for Alveolar Ridge Preservation? A Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Even after atraumatic tooth removal and/or immediate implant placement, some reduction of the alveolar ridge dimension is expected. To counteract (or limit) this reduction, alveolar ridge preservation technique (ARP) was developed. However, standard ARP techniques, such as grafting with bone substitutes, have some concerns, such as a long healing time prior to implant installation, residual graft particles, and often the need of re-grafting at implant installation. To overcome some of these limitations biologics have been discussed as an alternative approach, such as cross-linked hyaluronic acid (xHyA). However, whether the use of biologics only can achieve comparable results to the standard techniques, has yet to be answered.
The aim of the present single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial is to test non-inferiority in terms of mid-buccal alveolar ridge height resorption 4 months after ARP between 1) control/standard treatment (i.e., grafting with bone substitutes and socket seal) and 2) test treatment (i.e., xHyA applied with a collagen sponge and socket seal) at maxillary non-molar teeth.
Forty-eight patients will be included and randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups: 1) control group: standard ARP with deproteinized bovine bone material and covering of the socket with a free gingival graft (FGG) (n=24), 2) test group: application of xHyA soaked in a collagen sponge and covered by a FGG (n=24). The primary outcome parameter is the extent of mid-buccal alveolar ridge height resorption after 4 months, i.e., prior to implant installation, and the sample size calculation is based on a non-inferiority limit of 0.6 mm. The secondary outcome parameters are frequency of additional grafting at implant installation due to 1) a bony dehiscence or fenestration, 2) a thin buccal bone (< 1.5 mm), or 3) contour improvement, cervical alveolar ridge width, alveolar ridge volume, histomorphometric assessment of alveolar ridge healing, feasibility of implant installation, aesthetic outcome parameters, patient reported outcome measures, changes in keratinized mucosa width, soft tissue healing, and assessment of postoperative complications. Patients will be followed up to 1 year after prosthetic restoration.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Danijel Domic, Dr.med.dent.
- Phone Number: +43(1)400704101
- Email: danijel.domic@meduniwien.ac.at
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
(1) Patients elder than 18 years in need of (2) maxillary non-molar tooth extraction, and (3) later rehabilitation with delayed implant installation.
Exclusion Criteria:
(1) Patients with chronic diseases (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, etc.) and/or (2) taking any medication, influencing hard or soft-tissue healing; (3) acute pain/infection or (4) presence of a fistula at the extraction site; (5) untreated periodontal disease; (6) >25% of the buccal bone plate missing after tooth extraction; (7) pregnancy; (8) history of hypersensitivity or allergy to xHyA or xenogenic bone substitute material; and (9) inability to attend the follow-up appointments.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: DBBM + FGG
Deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles covered by free gingival graft
|
After tooth extraction, DBBM and FGG will be used for ARP.
|
|
Experimental: Hyaluronic acid + collagen sponge + FGG
Hyaluronic acid applied with collagen sponge and covered by free gingival graft
|
After tooth extraction, Hyaluronic acid, a collagen sponge and FGG will be used for ARP.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Extent of mid-buccal alveolar ridge height resorption
Time Frame: 4 months
|
The extent of mid-buccal alveolar ridge height resorption will be measured 4 months after ARP based on CBCT scans.
|
4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Danijel Domic, Dr.med.dent., Department of Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2030/2023
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.