Real-world Evaluation of the Implementation of LC-OCT in Daily Clinical Practice (RELI)
Real-world Evaluation of the Implementation of LC-OCT in Daily Clinical Practice: a Retrospective Observational Study
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the Netherlands, with incidence rates continuing to rise. The current diagnostic standard combines clinical evaluation and dermoscopy, while biopsy followed by histopathological examination remains the gold standard when uncertainty about the diagnosis persists. However, biopsy is invasive, time-consuming, and costly. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that has emerged as a promising alternative to biopsy for BCC suspected lesions.
This retrospective study aims to evaluate the real-world clinical performance of LC-OCT in routine dermatological practice, where it has been integrated into the diagnostic work-up for BCC-suspect lesions.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Detailed Description
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer in the Netherlands, with its incidence having increased substantially in recent years. ). Over the past decades, non-invasive imaging techniques such as line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) have emerged as promising alternatives to biopsy for the diagnosis of BCC. When BCC can be diagnosed with high confidence using (LC-)OCT, this may reduce the need for biopsies, accelerate treatment initiation, and improve healthcare efficiency. LC-OCT combines the principles of conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), enabling three-dimensional visualization of the skin at a cellular resolution.
Several studies have reported a high specificity of LC-OCT for identifying non-BCC lesions, ranging from 97-99%. In cases where BCC can be diagnosed with high confidence, biopsy may theoretically be omitted, meaning that treatment could be initiated promptly. Reported sensitivities for such "high-confidence" BCC diagnoses range from 95-100%.
Although the diagnostic accuracy of LC-OCT has been investigated extensively in research settings, evidence on its real-world clinical performance remains limited. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of LC-OCT in routine dermatological practice.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Klara Mosterd, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Yara Valkenburg, MD
- Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295
- Email: yara.valkenburg@mumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229HX
- Maastricht University Medical Center +
-
Contact:
- Klara Mosterd, MD PhD
- Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295
-
Contact:
- Yara Valkenburg, MD
- Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295
- Email: yara.valkenburg@mumc.nl
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged ≥18 years
- LC-OCT performed as part of diagnostic evaluation between January 2025 and June 2025 at Mohs clinics in the Netherlands
- Histopathological results (biopsy or excision) and/or 6-12 month clinical follow-up data available
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients <18 years of age
- Cases without histopathological confirmation or available follow-up data
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
|---|
|
Patients wit BCC suspected lesions who underwent LC-OCT imaging
Patients with clinically suspected BCC lesions requiring biopsy who underwent LC-OCT imaging as part of routine clinical care at Mohs Clinics.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tumor free survival
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Tumor-free survival rate at 6-12 months follow-up among patients with lesion(s) clinically suspicious for BCC, who were treated based on an LC-OCT-guided diagnosis, with treatment success defined as the absence of residual or recurrent tumor.
|
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy for BCC detection
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio) will be estimated for diagnosis made by LC-OCT (with histopathology serving as reference standard).
|
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
|
Treatment strategies
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Descriptive evaluation of treatment strategies following LC-OCT-guided diagnosis (ie surgical, topical).
|
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
|
Number of performed LC-OCT scans
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6-12 months
|
Descriptive evaluation: number of LC-OCT scans performed
|
From enrollment to 6-12 months
|
|
Lesion characteristics
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Descriptive: lesion characteristics (size, location)
|
At baseline
|
|
Proportion of biopsies omitted
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Proportion of biopsies omitted
|
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- METC2025-0250
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neoplasms
-
NCT07331532RecruitingBreast Neoplasms、Lung Neoplasms、Pancreatic Neoplasms
-
NCT07428213Not yet recruiting
-
NCT07173985RecruitingColonic Neoplasms
-
NCT06338332RecruitingColonic Neoplasms Malignant
-
NCT07557212Not yet recruiting
-
NCT00985036WithdrawnGlioma | Meningioma
-
NCT00179881CompletedBrain Stem Neoplasms, Primary | Neoplasms, Brain Stem