Real-world Evaluation of the Implementation of LC-OCT in Daily Clinical Practice (RELI)

March 24, 2026 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Real-world Evaluation of the Implementation of LC-OCT in Daily Clinical Practice: a Retrospective Observational Study

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the Netherlands, with incidence rates continuing to rise. The current diagnostic standard combines clinical evaluation and dermoscopy, while biopsy followed by histopathological examination remains the gold standard when uncertainty about the diagnosis persists. However, biopsy is invasive, time-consuming, and costly. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that has emerged as a promising alternative to biopsy for BCC suspected lesions.

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the real-world clinical performance of LC-OCT in routine dermatological practice, where it has been integrated into the diagnostic work-up for BCC-suspect lesions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer in the Netherlands, with its incidence having increased substantially in recent years. ). Over the past decades, non-invasive imaging techniques such as line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) have emerged as promising alternatives to biopsy for the diagnosis of BCC. When BCC can be diagnosed with high confidence using (LC-)OCT, this may reduce the need for biopsies, accelerate treatment initiation, and improve healthcare efficiency. LC-OCT combines the principles of conventional optical coherence tomography (OCT) and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), enabling three-dimensional visualization of the skin at a cellular resolution.

Several studies have reported a high specificity of LC-OCT for identifying non-BCC lesions, ranging from 97-99%. In cases where BCC can be diagnosed with high confidence, biopsy may theoretically be omitted, meaning that treatment could be initiated promptly. Reported sensitivities for such "high-confidence" BCC diagnoses range from 95-100%.

Although the diagnostic accuracy of LC-OCT has been investigated extensively in research settings, evidence on its real-world clinical performance remains limited. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical utility of LC-OCT in routine dermatological practice.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

297

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Klara Mosterd, MD PhD
  • Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229HX
        • Maastricht University Medical Center +
        • Contact:
          • Klara Mosterd, MD PhD
          • Phone Number: +31(0)43- 387 7295
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with lesions clinically suspected for BCC who visited the Mohs Clinics between January 2025 and June 2025 and underwent LC-OCT imaging as part of the diagnostic work-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years
  • LC-OCT performed as part of diagnostic evaluation between January 2025 and June 2025 at Mohs clinics in the Netherlands
  • Histopathological results (biopsy or excision) and/or 6-12 month clinical follow-up data available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients <18 years of age
  • Cases without histopathological confirmation or available follow-up data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients wit BCC suspected lesions who underwent LC-OCT imaging
Patients with clinically suspected BCC lesions requiring biopsy who underwent LC-OCT imaging as part of routine clinical care at Mohs Clinics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor free survival
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Tumor-free survival rate at 6-12 months follow-up among patients with lesion(s) clinically suspicious for BCC, who were treated based on an LC-OCT-guided diagnosis, with treatment success defined as the absence of residual or recurrent tumor.
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy for BCC detection
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic odds ratio) will be estimated for diagnosis made by LC-OCT (with histopathology serving as reference standard).
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Treatment strategies
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Descriptive evaluation of treatment strategies following LC-OCT-guided diagnosis (ie surgical, topical).
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Number of performed LC-OCT scans
Time Frame: From enrollment to 6-12 months
Descriptive evaluation: number of LC-OCT scans performed
From enrollment to 6-12 months
Lesion characteristics
Time Frame: At baseline
Descriptive: lesion characteristics (size, location)
At baseline
Proportion of biopsies omitted
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.
Proportion of biopsies omitted
From enrollment to end of treatment at 6-12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 15, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

IPD may be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request. Requests will be evaluated on a case by case manner.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Subscribe