Movement-Sequence Observation in Healthy Adults: Motor and Cognitive Effects on Effector-Independent Performance
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ariel, Israel, 40700
- Brain and Motor Behavior Laboratory based at Ariel University, Israel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
right-hand dominance and self-reported as healthy
Exclusion Criteria:
having musculoskeletal or neurological deficits interfering with task performance (proper UL and LL reaching performance)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Action Observation (AO)
Observing a video recording of a model performing the task
|
Participants observed reaching movement sequence performed by the left upper limb toward light switches (10 blocks of video clips, each containing 5 sequences (totaling 300 reaching movements), with a 10 second rest period between blocks).
|
|
Active Comparator: Sequence Observation (SO)
Observing a video of the sequence being illuminated on the device without observing any human movements
|
Participants observed a video clip of switches illuminating in the same sequence, from the same egocentric perspective, but without any human movements.
The illuminating switches were activated with the same timing and rest periods as those in the AO group
|
|
Sham Comparator: Neutral Observation (NO)
Observing a neutral video of nature veiws without any human movement
|
Participants observed a neutral movie that consisted of nature views without any human or animal movements.
These videos included 10-second blank screen intervals corresponding to the rest periods in the AO and SO video clips
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in response time (s) from baseline to post-test
Time Frame: baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
|
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
|
baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
|
|
Change in response time (s) from post-test to follow up
Time Frame: post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
|
post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
|
Change in response time (s) from baseline to follow up
Time Frame: baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
|
baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in failure (%) from post-test to follow up
Time Frame: post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer.
|
post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
|
Change in failure (%) from base line to follow up
Time Frame: baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer.
|
baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
|
|
Change in failure (%) from baseline to post-test
Time Frame: baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
|
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer
|
baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AU-HEA-SFT-20230511
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.