Multimodal mAgnetic Resonance imaGIng in Cardiovascular Disease (MAGIC)

July 26, 2026 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Multimodal-MRI in Cardiovascular Diseases

This single-center, prospective, observational cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical application value of multi-modal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

While traditional imaging methods have limitations in fully evaluating myocardial tissue characteristics, multi-modal CMR offers a comprehensive, non-invasive "one-stop" assessment. It can simultaneously evaluate heart structure, function, tissue features (such as fibrosis and edema), and hemodynamics.

The study plans to enroll patients with suspected or confirmed CVD. Participants will undergo a comprehensive multi-modal CMR scan (including Cine, T1/T2 mapping, Late Gadolinium Enhancement, and 4D flow sequences) as part of their evaluation. In addition to clinical evaluation, the study will explore sequence optimization (e.g., comparing pre-contrast vs. post-contrast Cine, and 3-slice vs. 9-slice T1 mapping) and evaluate deep learning-based virtual native enhancement (VNE) models trained under different sequence protocols.

By tracking clinical outcomes, the study seeks to establish a standardized imaging assessment system to improve the early detection, accurate diagnosis, risk stratification, and prognostic prediction for various types of cardiovascular diseases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of global mortality and disability. Accurate and early assessment of cardiac structure, function, and myocardial tissue characteristics is crucial for optimal clinical management. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) has evolved from single morphological imaging into advanced multi-modal imaging. By integrating Cine, Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE), T1/T2 mapping, and 4D flow techniques, multi-modal CMR serves as a "gold standard" that provides a comprehensive macroscopic and cellular-level evaluation, including the identification of myocardial fibrosis, edema, and complex hemodynamic alterations.

Despite its clinical potential, systematic research comparing the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value of multi-modal CMR features across a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases (such as ischemic heart disease, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, and valvular diseases) is still lacking. Furthermore, optimization of scan efficiency, standardization of sequence acquisition protocols, and the development of contrast-free or AI-driven virtual imaging techniques (such as deep learning-based virtual native enhancement ) represent critical avenues to enhance clinical utility.

This prospective, observational registry study is designed to address this gap by establishing a large-scale, standardized CMR imaging database. Approximately 2,000 patients with clinically suspected or confirmed CVD will be consecutively enrolled. Following routine clinical care pathways, participants will undergo a "one-stop" multi-modal CMR examination using 3.0T MRI scanners.

To refine imaging protocols and validate novel synthetic imaging algorithms, a subset/sub-cohort analysis will specifically investigate the impacts of acquisition parameters-comparing performance between pre-contrast Cine vs. post-contrast Cine, as well as 3-slice vs. 9-slice T1 mapping protocols-on downstream machine learning/deep learning models for virtual native enhancement and tissue characterization.

The primary objectives are to: 1) systematically delineate the imaging feature spectrum across different CVD subtypes; 2) optimize multi-modal CMR acquisition protocols and validate deep learning models for virtual image generation (e.g., VNE); 3) assess the sensitivity of hemodynamic and tissue-characterization parameters (especially T1 mapping and extracellular volume [ECV]) in detecting early cardiac damage; and 4) explore the correlation between multi-modal CMR parameters and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during the follow-up period. Ultimately, this study aims to provide robust, evidence-based support for precision diagnosis and risk stratification in cardiovascular medicine.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
        • Recruiting
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of consecutive adult patients (aged 18 years and older) who are clinically suspected or confirmed to have cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including but not limited to ischemic heart disease, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and valvular heart disease. These participants are enrolled from the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine. They are patients who are scheduled to undergo a multi-modal cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination as part of their clinical evaluation to determine disease etiology or assess myocardial tissue characteristics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years and older, with no gender restrictions.

Clinically suspected or confirmed cardiovascular disease (including but not limited to ischemic heart disease, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, valvular disease, etc.), requiring a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination to determine the etiology or evaluate myocardial tissue characteristics.

No contraindications to magnetic resonance examination, and able to cooperate with breath-holding instructions.

Voluntarily participate in this study and sign a written informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindications: Implantation of non-MRI compatible metallic foreign bodies (e.g., old pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators [ICD], aneurysm clips, etc.).

Relative contraindications: Severe claustrophobia, unable to complete the examination despite communication.

Severe renal insufficiency.

Special populations: Pregnant or lactating women.

Presence of severe arrhythmias (e.g., persistent atrial fibrillation) leading to severely impaired magnetic resonance signal acquisition, rendering the image quality inadequate for diagnosis.

Poor expected compliance: Unable to complete follow-up, or deemed unsuitable for enrollment by the investigator for other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Efficacy of Multi-modal CMR Parameters (AUC)
Time Frame: Baseline (at the time of CMR scan)
The Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) will be calculated to assess the diagnostic performance of multi-modal CMR parameters (specifically T1 mapping and extracellular volume [ECV]) in differentiating various types of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., ischemic vs. non-ischemic). The final clinical diagnosis based on ESC/ACC guidelines will serve as the gold standard.
Baseline (at the time of CMR scan)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between Imaging Parameters and Clinical Indicators
Time Frame: Baseline
To evaluate the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients between multi-modal CMR parameters (such as LGE, T1/T2 mapping, 4D flow metrics) and clinical functional/laboratory indicators.
Baseline
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
To evaluate the occurrence rate of MACE during the follow-up period. MACE is defined as a composite of cardiac death, readmission for heart failure, malignant arrhythmia (sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation), and non-fatal myocardial infarction.
Up to 3 years
Model performance for virtual native enhancement across different sequence acquisition protocols
Time Frame: At baseline
Model performance for virtual LGE generation across sequence protocols: Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM)
At baseline
Model performance for virtual LGE generation across sequence protocols: Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR)
Time Frame: At baseline
Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) will be evaluated to compare virtual LGE algorithms trained on pre- vs. post-contrast Cine and 3-slice vs. 9-slice T1 mapping protocols.
At baseline
Model performance for virtual LGE generation across sequence protocols: DICE coefficient
Time Frame: At baseline
DICE coefficient will be evaluated to compare virtual LGE algorithms trained on pre- vs. post-contrast Cine and 3-slice vs. 9-slice T1 mapping protocols.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 1, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2026-0319

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because of current institutional policies and national data security regulations regarding the protection of patient privacy and human genetic resources. The data contains sensitive medical imaging information that is restricted from being transferred or shared outside the participating institution without specific governmental and ethical approvals.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings