Music Effect on Concentration and Gait in Cerebral Palsy Children During Physical Therapy Sessions (NMT\CP)
Effect of Physiotherapy With Auditory Cueing on Concentration and Gait in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
- To investigate the effect of music therapy as an additional intervention with physical therapy on concentration in children with spastic CP.
- To investigate the effect of music therapy as an additional intervention with physical therapy on gait parameters for the children with spastic CP.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Physical therapy only could be not attractive for child if it done by the traditional way; focus on motor part and no need to involve the sensory part through the rehabilitation.
Sense of hearing could be a unique one to stimulate for a better child attention during physical therapy session, even child with blindness could benefit from this idea.
Using music for attracting attention of the child as a therapeutic way so the child can walk properly regarding time and pace.
Singing as a live form of music could be more sensitive and interactive for child-therapist bond which is important to include the child as an active participant as child is being rehabilitated not just treatment.
Rehabilitation means to involve the child as a whole at this complicated process, not to move a passive limb.
Rehabilitation of CP:
- A "temporal axis": Habilitation/rehabilitation should begin early and continuously - a minimum within the first years of child's life - and intensively - individually designed to meet child's needs.
- A "spatial axis": where individual space, family, school, and social affair places must be all considered.
- An "individual axis": Rehabilitation must observe the child as an active participant, not as a passive person of whom needs care.
- A "relational axis": the standard of taking into consideration the relationship of the child and people who take care of him/her in different contexts of their life (Trabacca et al., 2016).
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Shrouk Mahmoud Mohamed researcher at Cairo university faculty of physical therapy, master
- Phone Number: +201002952353
- Email: shrouk.rere@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Maya Galal Abd-Alwahab, Doctorate
- Phone Number: +201141904589
- Email: maya.galal@pt.cu.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
Giza Governorate
-
Dokki, Giza Governorate, Egypt, 02
- Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• The children age ranged from 5 to 7 years old (early childhood).
- Spasticity degree ranges from 1 to 1+ as measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale
- Children with lack of concentration according to MARS (Moss Attention Rating Scale)
- Children can stand alone and walk.
Exclusion Criteria:
- • Children with deafness.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: MT and PT
music and physical therapy
|
Neurologic music therapy (NMT) Listening to music and moving rhythmically.
program for gait improvement ( Standing, balance and gait training)
|
|
Active Comparator: PT
Physical therapy
|
program for gait improvement ( Standing, balance and gait training)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
concentration as a cognitive function
Time Frame: pre intervention and 3 months post intervention
|
ability of child to pay attention during physical therapy sessions and be interactive with the therapist, measured by Moss Attention Rating Scale, score of 22 (minimum score) to less than 110 (maximum score), Higher scores indicate better attention.
|
pre intervention and 3 months post intervention
|
|
Gait
Time Frame: pre intervention and 3 months post intervention
|
improvement measured by Gross motor function measure 88 (gait section), 0 (minimum score) to 100 (maximum score) percentage %
|
pre intervention and 3 months post intervention
|
|
Kinovea, (Spatial and Temporal Parameters)
Time Frame: pre and 3 months post intervention
|
Kinovea, (Spatial and Temporal Parameters); Step length in centimeters (higher score better)
|
pre and 3 months post intervention
|
|
Kinovea, (Spatial and Temporal Parameters) ; stride length in centimeters (higher score better)
Time Frame: pre and 3 months post intervention
|
Kinovea, (Spatial and Temporal Parameters); stride length in centimeters (higher score better)
|
pre and 3 months post intervention
|
|
Gait (cadence)
Time Frame: pre and 3 months post intervention
|
Using Kinovea, cadence measured in steps\minute (lower score better).
|
pre and 3 months post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Kamal El-sayed Shoukry, Doctorate, Professor of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics Faculty of Physical Therapy Cairo University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P.T.REC/012/002297
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.