Additive vs Subtractive Manufacturing for Endocrown Fabrication: A 24-Month RCT (ENDO-3D)
Additive Versus Subtractive Manufacturing for Endocrown Fabrication: A Clinical Comparison of 3D-Printed Ceramic-Filled Photopolymer Resin and CAD/CAM Milled Resin Nano-Ceramics Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth - A 24-Month Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Dina Ez Mohamed, BDS MSc PhD
- Phone Number: 01008007157
- Email: dina.ezz@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Rawda H Abdelaziz, BDS MSc PhD
- Email: rawda.hesham@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 25-45 years, male or female
- Endodontically treated molar tooth with radiographically confirmed treatment success and no clinical signs of failure
- Sufficient remaining coronal structure for endocrown preparation: minimum three walls, wall thickness 1.5 mm or greater, pulp chamber depth 3 mm or greater, supragingival preparation margins
- Completely erupted tooth with intact periodontal support
- Minimum of 20 occluding teeth
- Satisfactory oral hygiene status
- Capable of providing written informed consent and committed to scheduled follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed parafunctional habit or nocturnal bruxism
- Uncontrolled systemic illness or physical disability precluding safe participation
- Heavy tobacco use
- Current or suspected pregnancy
- Periapical disease or radiographic signs of endodontic failure
- Evidence of pathological tooth wear or occlusal erosion
- Moderate-to-severe periodontitis or tooth with hopeless prognosis
- Radiographic or clinical evidence of vertical root fracture
- Impaired decision-making capacity or anticipated non-compliance
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CAD/CAM Milled Endocrown
Endocrown restoration fabricated by subtractive CAD/CAM milling from HC Hard Block hybrid nano-ceramic (Shofu Inc., Japan), designed using ExoCAD software and milled on a five-axis wet-milling unit.
Adhesively cemented using Beautilink SA self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Shofu Inc., Japan).
|
Endocrown restoration milled from HC Hard Block hybrid nano-ceramic (Shofu Inc., Japan) using a five-axis wet-milling CAD/CAM unit.
Restoration designed with ExoCAD software, finished and glazed per manufacturer protocol, and cemented with Beautilink SA self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Shofu Inc., Japan).
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: 3D-Printed Endocrown
Endocrown restoration fabricated by additive manufacturing using VarseoSmile TriniQ ceramic-filled photopolymer resin (BEGO GmbH & Co. KG, Germany), printed on a 4K LCD printer at 30-45 degree build angle, post-cured under nitrogen atmosphere.
Adhesively cemented using Beautilink SA self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Shofu Inc., Japan).
|
Endocrown restoration 3D-printed using VarseoSmile TriniQ ceramic-filled photopolymer resin (BEGO GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) on a 4K LCD printer at 30-45 degree build angle.
Post-cured under nitrogen atmosphere, surface glazed, and cemented with Beautilink SA self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement (Shofu Inc., Japan).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Restoration Fracture Resistance
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Assessed using modified USPHS criteria: Alpha = absence of fracture; Bravo = minor chip amenable to repair; Charlie = catastrophic fracture, unrestorable
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = in situ; Bravo = partial displacement; Charlie = complete loss
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Marginal Discoloration
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = absent; Bravo = superficial; Charlie = penetrating
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Surface Texture
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = smooth; Bravo = minor irregularities; Charlie = extensive breakdown
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Anatomic Form
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = conforms to natural contour; Bravo = discrepancy present, dentin intact; Charlie = dentin or base exposed
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Color Match
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = indistinguishable from adjacent tooth; Bravo = minor deviation, clinically acceptable; Charlie = obvious mismatch; Delta = gross color failure
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Secondary Caries
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Modified USPHS: Alpha = absent; Charlie = present
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
|
Fabrication Time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Time in minutes from CAD design completion to restoration readiness for cementation
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
|
Visual Analogue Scale 0-100 mm; 0 = entirely dissatisfied, 100 = entirely satisfied
|
6, 12, and 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abou-Steit S, Ibrahim SH, Salem M. Three years clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate and hybrid nano-ceramic CAD/CAM endocrowns (randomized clinical trial). Egyptian Dental Journal 2024;70:551-561.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- /4/26 3D-Printed vs CAD/CAM
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.