3D-Printed Resin Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars. (3DRSCVSSSC)

June 11, 2026 updated by: Nariman osama Mohamed, Cairo University

Clinical Evaluation of 3D Printed Resin Based Crowns Versus Stainless Steel Crowns in Pulpotomized Primary Mandibular Molars : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether 3D-printed resin-based crowns are an effective alternative to stainless steel crowns for restoring pulpotomized primary mandibular molars in children. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do 3D-printed resin-based crowns provide better gingival health than stainless steel crowns? Are there differences in plaque accumulation, crown retention, and child and parent satisfaction between the two crown types?

Participants will:

Receive either a 3D-printed resin-based crown or a stainless steel crown after pulpotomy.

Attend follow-up visits for clinical evaluation over 12 months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

primary mandibular molars will be randomly assigned to receive either 3D-printed resin-based crowns or stainless steel crowns. Following pulp therapy and crown placement, participants will attend follow-up visits over a 12-month period. Clinical evaluation will be performed to assess gingival health, plaque accumulation, crown retention, and child and parent satisfaction, in order to determine whether 3D-printed resin-based crowns can be an effective esthetic alternative to stainless steel crowns.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children aged 4 to 8 years. Cooperative children who are able to accept dental treatment. Teeth diagnosed with reversible pulpitis. Children in good general health with no systemic conditions affecting oral health.

Parents/guardians willing to provide written informed consent and attend follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

Teeth deemed non-restorable (e.g., gross carious destruction or fractures beyond restoration).

Parents/guardians unwilling to participate in the study or provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 3D printed resin crowns
Children will receive indirect restorations using 3D-printed resin crowns on primary molars affected by reversible pulpitis
1-Select an appropriately sized resin-based prefabricated crown based on the mesio-distal width of the tooth. 2-Perform occlusal reduction of approximately 1.5-2.0 mm following the natural occlusal anatomy. 3-Reduce buccal and lingual cusps, central groove, and marginal ridges to achieve adequate occlusal clearance. 4-Perform proximal reduction using a tapered fissure or diamond bur to eliminate mesial and distal contacts by approximately 1.0 mm. 5-Avoid creating ledges or damaging adjacent teeth during proximal reduction. 6-Slightly reduce buccal and lingual surfaces to eliminate undercuts and facilitate crown seating. 7-Round and smooth all sharp line angles and points of the preparation. 8-In cases with adjacent teeth, perform additional interproximal reduction if required for proper seating.9-Try-in the crown intraorally and seat it using firm pressure from lingual to buccal direction. 10-Check marginal adaptation, ensuring slight subgingival extension (approximately 0.5-1.0 mm).
Active Comparator: Stainless steel crowns
Children will receive stainless steel crowns on primary molars affected by reversible pulpitis
1-Select an appropriately sized stainless steel crown based on the mesiodistal width of the tooth. 2-Perform minimal occlusal reduction (approximately 1.0-1.5 mm) following the anatomical occlusal contour to create suficient space for crown placement. 3-Lightly reduce proximal contacts to allow crown seating, without creating steps or excessive taper. 4-Perform minimal buccal and lingual reduction only if required to eliminate undercuts and facilitate passive seating. 5-Round sharp line angles and smooth rough surfaces to allow proper adaptation. 5-Verify adequate occlusal clearance and passive path of insertion. 6-Try-in the crown and adjustsize if necessary to ensure proper fit. 7-Trim and contour crown margins to achieve optimal gingival adaptation (if needed). 8-Seat the crown firmly using finger pressure to confirm complete seating. 9-Cement the crown with glass ionomer cement and remove excess cement after initial setting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival index
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

The GI was measured by passing an explorer tip gently within the sulcus mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual surface of each crowned molar. it was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 0= no bleeding

  1. only one bleeding point appearing someseconds after probing
  2. bleeding points appearing immediately after probing
  3. profuse bleeding appearing immediately after probing spreading towards the marginal gingiva
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque accumulation
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Silness &Löe plaque index 0: no plaque. 1: film at gingival margin. 2: moderate accumulation. 3: abundance of plaque.
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Child and parent satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediately post operative
Child and parent satisfaction will be assessed using a structured questionnaire based on a Likert scale. Participants (children and their parents/guardians) will rate their satisfaction with the treatment experience, comfort, aesthetics, and overall acceptance. Responses will be recorded on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied." The scores will be analyzed to compare satisfaction between study groups.
Immediately post operative
Crown retention
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months
Using United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria Alpha : intact Bravo : chipped or loss of material Charlie : complete loss of crown
baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sherine Badr, PHD, Cairo University
  • Principal Investigator: Nariman Osama, BDS, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Hanna Abdel Moneim, PHD, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FDCU-2026-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared. The study is conducted as part of a master's degree project, and participant confidentiality and privacy will be maintained according to institutional ethical guidelines. Only aggregated and anonymized study results may be published or presented

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on 3D printed resin based crowns

Search Similar Trials