- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07429747
Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars
Performance of Reinforced 3D-Printed Versus Direct Bulk-Filled Resin Composites for Restoring Extensive Class II Cavities in Vital Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient-related:
- Adults aged 22 to 45 years.
- Low to moderate caries risk.
- Normal occlusion.
- No signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders.
- Satisfactory oral hygiene.
- Medically fit to receive routine restorative dental treatment.
Lesion-related:
- Permanent molar requiring a compound Class II restoration.
- Primary carious lesion classified as ICDAS score 5.
- Presence of an adjacent tooth and a sound opposing tooth in occlusion.
- No clinical signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis in the involved, adjacent, or opposing teeth.
- No radiographic evidence of periapical pathology.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient-related:
- Bruxism.
- Poor cooperation.
- Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits.
- Anticipated travel during the study period.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Chronic or advanced periodontitis.
- Known allergy to any study materials.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Lesion-related:
- Teeth with visible fractures or cracks.
- Rampant caries.
- Defective restorations on adjacent or opposing teeth.
- Atypical extrinsic staining that may interfere with evaluation.
- Radiographic signs of apical pathology.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Bulk-filled resin composite
For restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin |
For restoration of Class II cavity preparations, a sectional metal matrix system (TOR VM, Russia) will be used to properly reestablish proximal anatomy and contact. The system includes a round separation ring and a pre-contoured metal band designed to reproduce natural proximal contours. A properly sized wedge is inserted to ensure optimal gingival adaptation of the matrix band and to prevent overhangs. The cavity is thoroughly rinsed with water before proceeding with adhesive procedures. Selective enamel etching is performed using 37% phosphoric acid gel applied to enamel margins for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and gentle air-drying. A universal adhesive system, Tetric N-Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), is then applied in two consecutive layers. Each layer is actively rubbed for 10 seconds, gently air-dried for 5 seconds, and light-cured for 20 seconds to ensure adequate polymerization and bond strength. Restoration is completed using Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill resin c |
|
Experimental: 3D-printed Ceramic reinforced resin restoration
Tooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible.
The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration.
Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention.
The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material.
Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures.
|
Tooth preparation for indirect inlay restorations follows conservative restorative principles, with the primary objective of eliminating carious tissue and unsupported enamel while preserving as much healthy tooth structure as possible. The preparation design emphasizes mechanical stability, stress distribution, and optimal seating of the final restoration. Cavity walls are shaped with a slight occlusal divergence of approximately 6-10°, facilitating proper insertion and seating of the inlay without compromising retention. The pulpal floor is prepared flat to enhance resistance form, and all internal line angles are rounded to minimize stress concentration within both the tooth and the restorative material. Cavosurface margins are ideally prepared as supragingival butt-joint margins whenever clinically feasible, promoting periodontal health, improved isolation, and easier finishing procedures. Cuspal coverage is generally avoided in inlay preparations to maintain maximum tooth integrit |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with a change in functional properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Time Frame: after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
Fracture of material, retention of the restoration, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact utilizing visual examination and radiographic assessment. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory & poor). |
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
|
Number of participants with a change in Biological properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Time Frame: after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
(Postoperative hypersensitivity & tooth vitality, Recurrence of caries, erosion & abfraction,Tooth integrity (enamel cracks or tooth fractures),Periodontal response (compared to a reference tooth), Adjacent mucosa, Oral & general health) utilizing visual examination. For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory & poor). |
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
|
Number of participants with a change in Esthetic properties of the restoration using (FDI) World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Time Frame: after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
(Surface luster, Staining (surface &margin),Color match & translucency & Esthetic anatomical form) utilizing visual examination For each criterion, one score will be chosen from 5 scores (excellent, good, satisfactory, unsatisfactory & poor). |
after restoration placement at 1 day (baseline), 6 months,12 months, and 18 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Abdelaziz MM,Fathy S,Alaraby AA,Shehab WI,Temirek MM
- Duarte S,Phark JH
- Balestra D,Lowther M,Goracci C,Mandurino M,Cortili S,Paolone G,Louca C,Vichi A
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Cons334
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Composite Restorations
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingResin Composite Restorations | Esthetic RestorationsJordan
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyCompletedDefective Composite RestorationsJordan
-
Dalhousie UniversityWithdrawnFailing Dental Composite RestorationsCanada
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillKerr CorporationCompletedComposite Restorations | Tooth LesionsUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingClass I Composite Restorations
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMicroleakage Around Resin Composite RestorationsEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedClass V Restorations | Composite RestorationEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAlkasite-based Restorations | Nano-hybrid Resin CompositeEgypt
-
Dalia Sameh FawziNot yet recruitingThe Clinical Performance of Two Dentine Replacement Materials in Deep Occlusal Cavities (Randomized)Occlusal Caries | Randomized Clinical Trial | Composite Resins | Class I Cavities in High Caries Risk | Class I Composite Restorations | Composite Restoration | Fiber Reinforced Composite | Injectable Composite
-
University of JordanActive, not recruitingPostoperative Tooth Sensitivity Following Class II Composite RestorationsJordan
Clinical Trials on bulk fill composite
-
Ataturk UniversityAtatürk University Scientific Research Projects Coordination UnitNot yet recruitingDental Caries Class II | Composite ResinsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Nuh Naci Yazgan UniversityTC Erciyes UniversityCompleted
-
Rizwan KhalilAga Khan University Hospital, PakistanRecruitingSurvival Rate of Bonded BracketsPakistan
-
Rasmia Mamdouh Ali SalemWorld Health OrganizationCompleted
-
Hacettepe UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Minia UniversityCompletedSonicFill Clinical Performance | Sonicated Bulk-fill Resin CompositeEgypt
-
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityUniversity of Beykent; Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCompletedDental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting