Effect of Simethicone on Colon Preparation During Water Exchange Colonoscopy

June 23, 2026 updated by: Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital

Effects of Simethicone on Colon Preparation in Water Exchange Colonoscopies: a Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer mortality by enabling early detection and removal of adenomas. Its effectiveness, however, depends heavily on bowel preparation quality and mucosal visibility. Simethicone, an anti-foaming agent, decreases intraluminal bubbles and improves visualization; studies in conventional air-insufflation colonoscopy generally show benefits for cleanliness and patient comfort, but evidence in water-exchange (WE) colonoscopy remains limited.Objective: To evaluate whether adding oral simethicone to a split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen further improves bowel cleanliness and procedural performance in WE colonoscopy.Methods: Adults undergoing outpatient colonoscopy will be randomly assigned (1:1) to a simethicone group or a control group, with a planned enrollment of 180 participants. All procedures will use the WE insertion technique, and endoscopists will be blinded to group allocation. The primary endpoint is the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS); adequate preparation is defined as a total score ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2. Secondary endpoints include bubble score and CEBuS, adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), cecal intubation rate and time, withdrawal time, volume of water used and flushing/irrigation metrics, and patient-reported tolerability and satisfaction.Expected Results: Compared with PEG alone, adding simethicone is expected to (1) increase the proportion of adequate BBPS preparations, (2) reduce bubble coverage, (3) maintain or potentially improve ADR/PDR, and (4) enhance patient tolerability and satisfaction.Conclusion: If effective, this intervention would provide a simple, low-cost strategy to optimize the quality of WE colonoscopy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
180

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy.
  • Procedures performed by participating endoscopists.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Colonoscopy performed using air insufflation or water immersion technique.
  • History of colorectal surgery (e.g., colectomy or colostomy).
  • Known or suspected colonic obstruction or severe stricture.
  • Requirement for inpatient bowel preparation.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to simethicone.
  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Without simethicone group
follow a bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution.
Drug: PEG
All participants followed a standardized bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution administered in a split-dose regimen.
Experimental: With simethicone group
Participants received a total of 30 mL of simethicone, with 15 mL added to each 1-liter dose of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution in the split-dose regimen.
Drug: Simethicone with PEG
All participants followed a standardized bowel preparation protocol consisting of 10 mg of bisacodyl and 2 liters of PEG solution administered in a split-dose regimen. Participants in the simethicone group additionally received 30 mL of simethicone (600 mg), with 15 mL added to each 1-liter dose of PEG solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS)
Time Frame: At the time of colonoscopy.
Bowel preparation quality assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Adequate preparation is defined as a total score ≥6 with all segment scores ≥2.
At the time of colonoscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bubble score assessed using a 4-point bubble scale
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
Bubble score assessed during colonoscopy using a 4-point scale (0-3) for each colon segment, where higher scores indicate more bubbles.
During the colonoscopy procedure.
Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale(CEBuS)
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
Bowel cleanliness assessed using the Colon Endoscopic Bubble Scale (CEBuS), categorized based on the percentage of mucosal surface obscured by bubbles (e.g., <5%, 5-50%, >50%).Higher scores indicate poorer visibility due to bubbles.
During the colonoscopy procedure.
Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
Time Frame: one week
one week
Polyp detection rate (PDR)
Time Frame: one week
one week
Cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: At the time of colonoscopy.
Proportion of procedures in which the cecum is successfully reached.
At the time of colonoscopy.
Cecal intubation time
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
Time from insertion to successful cecal intubation, measured in minutes.
During the colonoscopy procedure.
Withdrawal time
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure.
Time from cecal intubation to scope withdrawal, measured in minutes.
During the colonoscopy procedure.
Volume of water infused
Time Frame: During the procedure.
Total volume of water infused during colonoscopy, measured in milliliters.
During the procedure.
Volume of fluid aspirated
Time Frame: During the procedure
Total volume of fluid aspirated during colonoscopy, measured in milliliters.
During the procedure
Patient-reported pain score
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
Pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Immediately after the procedure.
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
Patient satisfaction assessed using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
Immediately after the procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A11403003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings