Advanced Robotic Techniques and Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Next-Generation Sequencing. (ARTEMIS)

June 29, 2026 updated by: Rafael Paez, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Advanced Robotic Techniques and Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Next-Generation Sequencing: the ARTEMIS Trial.

ARTEMIS is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The goal is to understand whether rapid onsite evaluation during robotic assisted bronchoscopy improves the diagnostic performance of the procedure or not.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pulmonary nodules are an incredibly common finding, with millions incidentally detected in the US every year. Biopsy is often needed for diagnosis. Robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) with integrated cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has achieved diagnostic yields exceeding 80% in some studies, significantly higher than traditional methods without advanced imaging, due to the added ability to correct alignment of the bronchoscopy catheter with the target lesion in real-time. Given this, the added value of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) with modern bronchoscopy is an area of debate. ROSE involves immediate intraprocedural microscopic assessment of biopsy specimens (typically by a cytotechnologist) to confirm adequacy of biopsy samples for malignant diagnosis during the bronchoscopy. This study will aim to test the hypothesis that modern bronchoscopy done without ROSE guidance is non-inferior to bronchoscopy with ROSE available. Patients undergoing RAB to biopsy a lung lesion will be approached for enrollment and assigned to either ROSE vs no ROSE if they agree to participate. Randomization will be revealed before procedures are started. All decisions regarding procedure tools, techniques, and patient management will be per usual care and at the discretion of the treating physician.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Rush University Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • James Katsis, MD
        • Contact:
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Kapp, MD
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University
        • Contact:
          • Jenna Loss Research coordinator
          • Phone Number: 410-955-5000
          • Email: jlos1@jhmi.edu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jeffrey Thiboutot, MD
    • Massachusetts
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States, 01805
        • Lahey Hospital and Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carla Lamb, MD
        • Contact:
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lonny Yarmus, DO
        • Contact:
          • Shanti Persuad Research coordinator
          • Phone Number: 332-699-7260
          • Email: mangarl@mskcc.org
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27154
        • University of North Carolina Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Akulian, MD
        • Contact:
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Gilbert, MD
        • Contact:
          • Michael Balassone Research coordinator
          • Phone Number: 843-792-2300
          • Email: balassom@musc.edu
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rafael Paez, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years of age at time of bronchoscopy
  • Undergoing robotic assisted bronchoscopy to biopsy a pulmonary lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declines to participate or inability to provide informed consent.
  • Clinician determination that the use of ROSE is required or contraindicated for the optimal care of an individual patient
  • Patient enrolled in another trial that requires ROSE for PPL biopsy
  • Patient previously consented for this trial
  • Pregnant or incarcerated patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Robotic assisted bronchoscopy with ROSE
Participants allocated to the robotic assisted bronchoscopy arm with rapid onsite evaluation will have ROSE available during the procedure
Other: Rapid onsite evaluation
ROSE involves immediate intraprocedural microscopic assessment of biopsy specimens (typically by a cytotechnologist) to confirm adequacy of biopsy samples for malignant diagnosis during the bronchoscopy
Active Comparator: Robotic assisted bronchoscopy without ROSE
Participants allocated to the robotic assisted bronchoscopy arm without rapid onsite evaluation will not have ROSE available during the procedure
Other: Rapid onsite evaluation
ROSE involves immediate intraprocedural microscopic assessment of biopsy specimens (typically by a cytotechnologist) to confirm adequacy of biopsy samples for malignant diagnosis during the bronchoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Strict diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of procedures that result in acquisition of lesional tissue.
Time Frame: 7 days post procedure

Lesional tissue is defined by the presence of specific pathological findings that readily explain the presence of a pulmonary lesion. The following common pathological findings are pre-specified:

  1. Malignancy
  2. Specific benign pathologic findings including: organizing pneumonia, frank purulence/robust neutrophilic inflammation with a pathogen isolated, granulomatous inflammation, hamartoma, amyloidoma or other uncommon causes of peripheral pulmonary lesions with distinctive pathological patterns.
7 days post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sufficiency of malignant specimens for Next-Generation Sequencing
Time Frame: 30 days post procedure
Proportion of malignant biopsies with sufficient material to send for NGS
30 days post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Fabien Maldonado, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 29, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 260528

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported will be made available after de-identification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will become available 3 months following publication of outcomes and will remain available for at least 3 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal that has been approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Review Board and the study executive committee.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings