Comparison of Postoperative Functional Outcomes Between Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Comparison of Postoperative Functional Outcomes Between Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Random Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ran Zhao, MD
- Phone Number: +8613161866294
- Email: 2411210441@pku.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Haidian
-
Beijing, Haidian, China
- Orthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital
-
Contact:
- Orthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital
- Phone Number: +8613161866294
- Email: 2411210441@pku.edu.cn
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 50 to 80 who are diagnosed with end-stage knee osteoarthritis that require unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty;
- Patients who are determined by clinical and laboratory tests to have no absolute surgical contraindications;
- Patients with good compliance, willing and able to undergo follow-up observations as required and sign the informed consent form;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a history of surgery on the affected knee joint in the past;
- Patients with neuromuscular diseases;
- Patients scheduled for knee joint replacement revision surgery;
- Patients with active knee joint infection or systemic infection;
- Patients who receive primary joint replacement due to non-knee osteoarthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculous arthritis, traumatic arthritis, etc;
- Patients with valgus or varus deformity of the knee joint greater than 15°;
- Patients with knee flexion deformity greater than 15°;
- Patients whose heart and lung functions are determined by clinical and laboratory tests to be unable to tolerate surgery;
- Patients with mental disorders who are unable to cooperate with treatment;
- Patients who is lactating or pregnant;
- Patients who are unwilling to participate in this study and did not sign the informed consent form;
- Patients with poor compliance and inability to cooperate in completing the follow-up observers at critical times;
- For any reason, the researchers believe that the subject is unlikely to complete this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: subvastus approach
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach.
|
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with subvastus approach to expose the knee joint.
|
|
Active Comparator: medial parapatellar approach
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach, which is classic, mature and with exact curative effect.
|
Patients receive total knee arthroplasty with medial parapatellar approach to expose the knee joint
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
Knee Society Score(KSS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
The lower the score, the more severe the symptoms and the worse the postoperative functional recovery.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
Short Form 12 Health Survey Questionnaire(SF-12)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
The higher score equals to the better postoperative satisfaction.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
First Unassisted Straight Leg Raise(SLR)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
Record the time of the first postoperative unassisted straight leg raise of every patient.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Range of Motion of Knee Joint(ROM)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
|
Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
The higher the score, the stronger the patient's subjective pain perception.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
Myodynamia of Quadriceps Femoris
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
Surgeons will measure the patients' muscle strength of Quadriceps Femoris using manual muscle testing, based on Lovett Scale for Muscle Strength Assessment.
|
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 2 years after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
|
Shear Wave Elastography of Quadriceps Femoris
Time Frame: 3 months after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
SWE displays the strength and hardness with precise values.
|
3 months after receiving total knee arthroplasty
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aladraii AA, Allehaibi LZ, Fattani AA, Alkhudairy TA, Al-Margan AM, Al-Dubai SAR, Mohammed AA, Mohorjy DK, Alqarni AS. Functional Outcome of Subvastus versus Medial Parapatellar Approaches for Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;12(1):35-39. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_237_23. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
- Migliorini F, Aretini P, Driessen A, El Mansy Y, Quack V, Tingart M, Eschweiler J. Better outcomes after mini-subvastus approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Aug;30(6):979-992. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02648-9. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
- Khan MNH, Abbas K, Faraz A, Ilyas MW, Shafique H, Jamshed MH, Hashmi P. Total knee replacement: A comparison of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 8;68:102670. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102670. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- Wu Y, Zeng Y, Bao X, Xiong H, Hu Q, Li M, Shen B. Comparison of mini-subvastus approach versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
- Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3854-3860. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
- Hosseini-Monfared P, Mirahmadi A, Amiri S, Minaie R, Ghafouri MH, Kazemi SM. Comparable long-term functional outcomes of subvastus and medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: A 10-year follow-up study. J Exp Orthop. 2024 Oct 8;11(4):e70035. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
- Mahmoudian A, Lohmander LS, Mobasheri A, Englund M, Luyten FP. Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee - time for action. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Oct;17(10):621-632. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00673-4. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PUTH00238
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.