Low-cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Dressings for Gustilo IIIb Tibial Fractures (Bukavu Pilot RCT) (BukavuNPWTRC)

August 25, 2026 updated by: Tumusifu Manegabe Jean de Dieu, Université Catholique de Bukavu

Low-cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Wound Dressings for Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIb Open Tibial Fractures in a Low-resource Setting: Protocol for a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial in Bukavu,Democratic Republic of Congo

Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is widely used in the management of acute and chronic wounds, but commercial systems are costly and may be inaccessible in low-resource settings. This pilot randomised controlled trial will assess the feasibility of a future definitive multicentre trial comparing a locally developed low-cost NPWT system with standard wound dressings in adults with Gustilo-Anderson type IIIb open tibial fractures.

Methods and analysis: Adults aged ≥18 years presenting to the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of the Hôpital Provincial Général de Référence de Bukavu between 1 January and 31 December 2027, within 72 hours of sustaining an open tibial fracture, will be screened. Final eligibility will be confirmed after initial surgical debridement; patients with Gustilo-Anderson type IIIb injuries will be randomised 1:1 to low-cost NPWT or standard wound dressings. A pragmatic sample of 66 participants (33 per group) is planned.

The pilot is not powered for clinical effectiveness. Feasibility outcomes will include recruitment, consent, intervention delivery and fidelity, crossover and discontinuation, retention, data completeness and safety. Prespecified progression criteria will inform the design of a future definitive multicentre trial.

All randomised participants will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Clinical outcomes will be exploratory, with fracture-related infection within 3 months as the main exploratory clinical outcome. Effect estimates will be reported with 95% confidence intervals, with emphasis on magnitude and precision rather than formal hypothesis testing.

Ethics and dissemination: The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Université Catholique de Bukavu (UCB/CIES/PB/GM/012/2026) and will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent will be obtained before randomisation. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific meetings, and accessible summaries for participants and the local clinical community.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This pilot randomised controlled trial will provide prospective evidence on the feasibility of evaluating a locally developed low-cost negative pressure wound therapy system for Gustilo-Anderson type IIIb open tibial fractures in a resource-limited setting.
  • Random allocation with concealed allocation and blinded assessment of fracture-related infection and digital wound measurements, where feasible, will reduce important sources of bias.
  • Prespecified feasibility outcomes and progression criteria will inform the design, sample size, recruitment strategy and outcome-assessment procedures of a future definitive multicentre randomised controlled trial.
  • The single-centre design and small pragmatic sample size limit the generalisability of the findings and preclude definitive conclusions regarding the clinical effectiveness of low-cost negative pressure wound therapy.
  • The nature of the interventions prevents blinding of participants and treating clinicians, and limited access to some diagnostic investigations may affect the completeness of fracture-related infection assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. Recruitment rate during the recruitment period Recruitment rate will be calculated as the number of participants randomised per month from the beginning to the end of the recruitment period. The result will be reported as the total number of participants recruited, the duration of the recruitment period and the mean number of participants recruited per month.
  2. Proportion of eligible participants who provide informed consent This measure will be calculated as the number of eligible participants who provide informed consent divided by the total number of eligible participants approached. The result will be reported as a number and percentage.
  3. Proportion of randomised participants who receive the assigned intervention This measure will be calculated as the number of randomised participants who receive the intervention to which they were allocated divided by the total number of randomised participants. The result will be reported as a number and percentage overall and separately for each treatment group.
  4. Proportion of participants adhering to the assigned wound-management protocol Adherence will be assessed according to the prespecified protocol requirements for low-cost negative pressure wound therapy or standard wound dressings. The result will be reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting the prespecified adherence criteria in each treatment group.
  5. Proportion of randomised participants completing the prespecified follow-up assessments This measure will be calculated as the number of randomised participants who complete the prespecified follow-up assessments divided by the total number of randomised participants. The result will be reported as a number and percentage overall and by treatment group.
  6. Completeness of clinical outcome data at the final follow-up assessment Data completeness will be calculated as the number of required outcome assessments completed divided by the total number of outcome assessments expected according to the study protocol. The result will be reported as a percentage, overall and separately for each treatment group.

Clinical outcomes will be considered exploratory outcomes. They will be summarised using the prespecified clinical measures and will not be used to draw definitive conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness in this pilot trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • South Kivu
      • Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, B.P.285
        • Université Catholique de Bukavu
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jean de Dieu Tumusifu Manegabe, PhD student

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients (age ≥18 years)
  • admitted at orthopedic and trauma departement
  • between 1 January 2027 and 31 December 2027,
  • within 72 hours of sustaining an open tibial fracture Gustilo IIIb
  • before and after debridement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes mellitus,
  • peripheral vascular disease,
  • vascular injury requiring repair,
  • chronic steroid use,
  • coagulopathies,
  • cancer;
  • open fractures older than 3 days;
  • fractures previously operated on;
  • chronic osteomyelitis;
  • primary amputation,
  • immunosuppression,
  • multiple fractures,
  • polytrauma,
  • pregnancy;
  • preexisting dermatological conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1: Low-cost NPWT
Low-cost negative pressure wound therapy applied after debridement according to protocol
Low-cost NPWT :low-cost negative pressure therapy dressing applied after debridement for Gustilo type IIIb open tibia fractures, with dressing changes according to the study protocol.
Active Comparator: Arm 2: standard wound dressing
Conventional wound dressing applied after debridement according to protocol
Standard wound dressing applied after debridement for Gustilo type IIIb open tibia fractures, with dressing changes according to the study protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and percentage of participants meeting the prespecified feasibility criteria
Time Frame: From the start of recruitment through completion of the final follow-up assessment at 12 months after randomisation
Feasibility will be assessed using prespecified criteria related to recruitment, informed consent, receipt of the assigned intervention, adherence to the assigned wound-management protocol, completion of follow-up assessments and completeness of outcome data. Each criterion will be reported as the number and percentage of participants meeting the criterion. Recruitment will additionally be summarised as the number of participants randomised per month during the recruitment period. Results will be reported overall and separately for the low-cost negative pressure wound therapy and standard wound-dressing groups. Clinical outcomes will be considered exploratory and will not be used to draw definitive conclusions regarding treatment effectiveness.
From the start of recruitment through completion of the final follow-up assessment at 12 months after randomisation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Englebert, Professor, CH UCL Mont Godinne- Namur/Belgique

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RDC2026008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De- indentified individual participant data will be shared with qualified reseachers upon reasonable resultats. Data sharing will occur in compliance with applicable ethical and regularitory requirements.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

start date: After publication of the primary resultats End date: 12 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified reseachers who provide a scientififcally valid proposal and agree to data use terms

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Study Data/Documents

  1. Individual Participant Data Set
    Information identifier: To be assigned
    Information comments: To be assigned upon publication
  2. Study Protocol
    Information identifier: To be assigned
    Information comments: To be assigned upon publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.