The Parasite and Infestation Study

September 24, 2026 updated by: Julia Sheffield, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Understanding the Experience of Patient-Physician Diagnostic Incongruency: I Know Something is Wrong But No One Believes Me

Many people have evidence of bugs, parasites, and infestation, but are told by others that they cannot find a cause. This distressing and frustrating experience can last for years, as the person seeks answers. The current study aims to understand the experience of these individuals. In a 1-2 hour session over Zoom, the investigators will ask participants questions about their experience, have them complete self-report questionnaires, and ask them to complete a few games on the computer. The investigators' goal is to help characterize and understand individuals with this experience to aid in better treatment and inform recommendations for providers.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The current study aims to characterize the experiences of people who have evidence of bugs, parasites, and/or infestation but are told by physicians or other professionals (e.g. vets, pest control) that there is nothing wrong. The investigators seek to understand the emotional and cognitive aspects of this experience, through semi-structured interviews, self-report questionnaires, and cognitive tasks. The study will take a few hours and is conducted remotely, allowing for participation regardless of the participant's physical location. There is practically no aggregate information on this experience, with most current information relying on case reports and medical record review. The investigators hope to provide greater insights into this experience to guide support for individuals going through this difficult process.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

25

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
        • Recruiting
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with a persistent experience of infestation or parasite that physicians or other professionals report no evidence for.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 18-70 years old
  • At least 50% certain that they have an active infection/infestation/parasite, despite being told by doctor that they do not
  • Ability to read and speak English
  • Access to a computer or phone for virtual visit
  • No self-reported history of schizophrenia-spectrum disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active substance use disorder (excluding nicotine and caffeine)
  • History of severe head trauma
  • Current use of antipsychotics
  • Serious medical or neurological illness known to interfere with cognitive functioning
  • Diagnosis of a learning disability or cognitive disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: COHORT
  • Time Perspectives: CROSS_SECTIONAL

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PPDI Group

This study will not involve an intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological Wellbeing
Time Frame: Baseline

Total score on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS); scores range from 14-70; higher scores reflect greater wellbeing

Baseline
Social Network
Time Frame: Baseline

Ludden Social Network Scale - total score; higher scores reflect larger and closer social network (score: 0-30)

Baseline
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline

Total score - Beck Depression Inventory -II; Scores range from 0-63 with higher scores reflecting worse depression

Baseline
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline

Perseverative Thinking Questionnaire (PTQ); scores range from 0-60, higher scores reflect more perseveration

Baseline
Belief Updating
Time Frame: Baseline

Expectations of prior volatility (mu3) calculated from reversal learning task; higher parameter scores reflect greater expectations of volatility

Baseline
BADE
Time Frame: Baseline

Evidence Integration Impairment (EII) will be calculated based on decisions on the Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence task. Higher scores reflect more difficulty integrating information

Baseline
Interoceptive Awareness
Time Frame: Baseline

Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness-2; scores range from 0-185; higher scores reflect better interpersonal awareness

Baseline
Dissociation
Time Frame: Baseline

Cernis Felt Sense of Anomaly Scale (CEFSA); scores range from 0-140, higher scores reflect more severe dissociative experiences

Baseline
Childhood Trauma
Time Frame: Baseline

Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ)- scores range from 5-100, higher scores reflect more severe childhood maltreatment

Baseline
DACOBS
Time Frame: Baseline

Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases Scale; higher scores reflect more severe cognitive biases. Scores range from 42-294

Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia Sheffield, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201489

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.