Phase 2 Evaluation of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) Injection for the Treatment of Infraorbital Hollowing

October 27, 2026 updated by: Lynch Regenerative Medicine

A Multicenter, Phase 2 Randomized, Dose-Ranging and Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) Injection for the Treatment of Infraorbital Hollowing

The goal of this Phase 2 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary effectiveness of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) injections for the treatment of moderate to severe infraorbital hollowing (under-eye hollows) in adults aged 21 to 65 years. The study is intended to evaluate the:

  • Safety and tolerability of rhPDGF-BB following injections in the infraorbital area
  • Preliminary efficacy (responder rate) of rhPDGF-BB compared with placebo
  • Effect of different doses of rhPDGF-BB compared with placebo with respect to treatment response and durability
  • Pharmacokinetic profile following injection of rhPDGF-BB in the infraorbital region
  • Immunogenicity profile following injection of rhPDGF-BB in the infraorbital region

This study will compare two doses of rhPDGF-BB (37.5 µg and 75 µg per infraorbital region) with placebo (normal saline) to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of rhPDGF-BB for improving infraorbital hollowing.

Participants will:

  • Receive injections of rhPDGF-BB or placebo in the infraorbital area.
  • Attend follow-up visits for safety and assessment of changes in infraorbital hollowing.
  • Undergo clinical grading and standardized facial imaging and complete questionnaires about treatment outcomes and satisfaction.
  • Provide blood samples for assessment of drug exposure and immune response to rhPDGF-BB.
  • Be evaluated for possible retreatment at Week 8 according to the study protocol and followed for up to 24 weeks after their final treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Infraorbital hollowing is characterized by a visible depression of the lower eyelid-cheek junction that may contribute to a tired or aged appearance. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) is being investigated as an injectable biologic treatment for infraorbital hollowing. This Phase 2 study is intended to characterize the safety and tolerability of rhPDGF-BB, obtain preliminary estimates of treatment effect, evaluate dose-response relationships, and generate information to support dose and endpoint selection for subsequent clinical development. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study. Approximately 75 participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by study site and baseline severity of infraorbital hollowing. Subjects, outcome assessors, and image analysts will remain blinded to treatment assignment; designated personnel responsible for study intervention preparation and administration may be unblinded. An initial sentinel cohort will be enrolled and dosed sequentially in a staggered manner before full cohort enrollment. The sentinel phase is intended to characterize initial safety and tolerability, evaluate the feasibility of study procedures, and support Data and Safety Monitoring Board review before progression to broader enrollment. It is not intended to provide a definitive assessment of efficacy. The study will characterize treatment response using clinician-reported assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and standardized imaging. Three-dimensional and spectral imaging will provide quantitative measures of changes in infraorbital volume and skin characteristics. Pharmacokinetic assessments in a subset of participants (n=12) will characterize systemic exposure, if measurable, following local administration, and immunogenicity assessments will evaluate the development of anti-drug and neutralizing antibodies. Analyses will characterize safety and tolerability, estimate responder rates and treatment effects, examine dose-response relationships, assess the variability and responsiveness of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures, and evaluate durability of response. These data are intended to inform dose selection, endpoint strategy, and design assumptions for subsequent clinical development.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Steve Yoelin MD and Associates
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Steve Yoelin, MD
        • Contact:
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404
        • Ava T. Shamban M.D., INC
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ava Shamban, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60657
        • Fulcrum Aesthetics and Surgery
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Hill, MD
        • Contact:
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20850
        • Aesthetic & Dermatology Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lawrence Green, MD
        • Contact:
    • Michigan
      • Birmingham, Michigan, United States, 33131
        • Cosmetic Skin & Laser Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Charles Boyd, MD
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rod Rohrich, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 21 to 65 years of age.
  • Moderate to severe infraorbital hollowing, defined as a Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS) score ≥3; mild orbital fat ptosis is permitted if, in the investigator's judgment, the condition is amenable to treatment.
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-VI.
  • Willing and able to comply with study visits and photography requirements and provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to refrain from other aesthetic treatments in the infraorbital region for the duration of the study.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to use a highly effective method of contraception from screening through 24 weeks after the final treatment. Acceptable methods include methods with a failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly (e.g., hormonal contraception, intrauterine device/system, bilateral tubal occlusion, or sexual abstinence consistent with the participant's lifestyle). Women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breastfeeding.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior or planned during the study period dermal fillers, fat grafting, other injectable treatments, or aesthetic procedures in the infraorbital region.
  • Significant orbital fat herniation, skin laxity, or anatomical features that may confound assessment of infraorbital hollowing.
  • Prior surgical procedures in the infraorbital or periorbital region (e.g., blepharoplasty).
  • Lower-lid surgery (blepharoplasty) within 12 months or unresolved sequelae.
  • Active dermatologic disease, inflammation, or infection in the treatment area.
  • Autoimmune or connective tissue disease, immunosuppression, or other uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., diabetes) judged to increase risk, affect healing, or otherwise affect study outcomes.
  • Known hypersensitivity to study product components or to local anesthetics used per protocol, including allergy to yeast-derived products.
  • History of abnormal wound healing (e.g., keloids or hypertrophic scarring).
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Clinically significant ophthalmologic conditions that may confound safety assessments, including but not limited to visual acuity not corrected to at least 20/40, active glaucoma, severe dry eye disease, diabetic retinopathy, history of ocular surgery within 12 months, retinal or vascular ocular disease, or active ocular infection or inflammation.
  • Any medical history, condition, or prior procedure affecting the anatomy, appearance, or function of the infraorbital area, periorbital structures, orbital contents, nose, or mid-face that, in the investigator's judgment, would confound assessment of study treatment safety or efficacy or pose increased procedural risk. This includes, but is not limited to, prior orbital trauma or fracture, prior orbital or periorbital surgery, active or recurrent periorbital infections or inflammatory dermatoses, systemic anticoagulation or bleeding disorders, and active autoimmune or connective tissue diseases.
  • Concurrent use of prescription or nonprescription products with known or suspected growth-factor-mediated effects within protocol-defined washout periods that may confound efficacy assessment.
  • Use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, or medications that may increase bleeding risk, unless stable and medically appropriate.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the protocol-defined period before screening.
  • Known, untreated malignant neoplasm(s) at the treatment site(s) or currently undergoing radiation therapy or chemotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Low-Dose rhPDGF-BB (37.5 µg) per infraobital region

Participants randomized to this arm will receive recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) injection at a dose of 37.5 µg per infraorbital region. Participants may receive a protocol-permitted repeat treatment at Week 8 based on predefined retreatment criteria.
Biological: RhPDGF-BB

Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB; becaplermin) is administered by subcutaneous injection into each infraorbital region. Participants assigned to active treatment receive either 37.5 µg or 75 µg of rhPDGF-BB per infraorbital region in a standardized injection volume of 0.75 mL. Participants meeting protocol-defined criteria may receive an optional repeat treatment at Week 8 using their originally assigned treatment.
Experimental: High-Dose rhPDGF-BB (75 µg) per infraobital region

Participants randomized to this arm will receive recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) injection at a dose of 75 µg per infraorbital region. Participants may receive a protocol-permitted repeat treatment at Week 8 based on predefined retreatment criteria.
Biological: RhPDGF-BB

Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB; becaplermin) is administered by subcutaneous injection into each infraorbital region. Participants assigned to active treatment receive either 37.5 µg or 75 µg of rhPDGF-BB per infraorbital region in a standardized injection volume of 0.75 mL. Participants meeting protocol-defined criteria may receive an optional repeat treatment at Week 8 using their originally assigned treatment.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Normal Saline)

Participants randomized to this arm will receive normal saline placebo injection in the infraorbital region. Participants may receive a protocol-permitted repeat treatment at Week 8 based on predefined retreatment criteria.
Drug: Normal Saline

Sterile normal 0.9% sodium chloride is administered as placebo by injection into each infraorbital region using the same administration approach as the investigational treatment. A volume of 0.75 mL is administered per infraorbital region. Participants meeting protocol-defined criteria may receive an optional repeat treatment at Week 8 using their originally assigned treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence, Severity, and Relationship of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first study injection through 24 weeks after the final treatment (up to Week 32 for participants receiving retreatment at Week 8)

Incidence, severity, seriousness, and relationship to study treatment of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events of special interest (AESIs), and injection-site reactions. Adverse events will be coded using MedDRA, graded for severity, assessed for relationship to study treatment, and followed to resolution or stabilization. Safety assessments include local injection-site reactions, systemic adverse events, serious adverse events, and protocol-defined adverse events of special interest.
From first study injection through 24 weeks after the final treatment (up to Week 32 for participants receiving retreatment at Week 8)
Proportion of Participants With ≥1-Grade Improvement on the Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after final treatment (Week 12 after initial treatment or Week 20 for participants retreated at Week 8)

Proportion of participants classified as responders, defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from baseline on the Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS) 12 weeks after the final treatment, as assessed by a blinded evaluator. The CIOHS is a 4-point photonumeric scale ranging from 1 (none) to 4 (severe), with lower scores indicating less severe infraorbital hollowing.
12 weeks after final treatment (Week 12 after initial treatment or Week 20 for participants retreated at Week 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Responder rate (Proportion of Participants With ≥2-Grade Improvement on the Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS)) 12 weeks after final treatment
Time Frame: 12 weeks after final treatment (Week 12 for participants receiving a single treatment; Week 20 for participants retreated at Week 8)

Proportion of participants achieving a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline on the Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS), as assessed by a blinded evaluator. The CIOHS is a 4-point photonumeric scale ranging from 1 (none) to 4 (severe), with lower scores indicating less severe infraorbital hollowing.
12 weeks after final treatment (Week 12 for participants receiving a single treatment; Week 20 for participants retreated at Week 8)
Time Course and Durability of Change From Baseline in Canfield Infraorbital Hollow Severity Scale (CIOHS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in CIOHS score at all post-treatment assessments. CIOHS is a 4-point photonumeric scale ranging from 1 (none) to 4 (severe); a decrease from baseline indicates improvement in infraorbital hollowing.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Investigator-Assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Global aesthetic improvement following treatment as assessed by the investigator using the GAIS relative to baseline. GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from "worse" to "very much improved" evaluating overall aesthetic improvement. Relative improvement on the GAIS ("much improved" and "very much improved") will be used in support of analysis of clinical meaningfulness for other outcome measures.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Participant-Assessed Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Global aesthetic improvement following treatment as assessed by the participant using the GAIS relative to baseline. GAIS is a 5-point scale ranging from "worse" to "very much improved" evaluating overall aesthetic improvement. Relative improvement on the GAIS ("much improved" and "very much improved") will be used in support of analysis of clinical meaningfulness for other outcome measures.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Recovery Early Symptoms Scores
Time Frame: Baseline through 14 days after each treatment

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Recovery Early Symptoms patient-reported outcome scores evaluating early symptoms related to the treatment procedure according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Recovery Early Symptoms outcome are the result of increased symptom severity.
Baseline through 14 days after each treatment
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Study-Specific Adverse Events: Eyes Scores
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Study-Specific Adverse Events: Eyes patient-reported outcome scores evaluating symptoms directly related to the treatment procedure in the periorbital area according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Study-Specific Adverse Events: Eyes outcome are the result of increased symptom severity.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcomes Scores
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Satisfaction with Outcomes patient-reported outcome scores evaluating satisfaction related to the treatment procedure according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Satisfaction with Outcomes outcome are the result of increased satisfaction.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Psychological Function Scores
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Psychological Function patient-reported outcome scores evaluating quality of life related to the treatment procedure according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Psychological Function outcome are the result of increased quality of life.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Short Form - Skin Feels: Skin Quality Scores
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Short Form - Skin Feels: Skin Quality patient-reported outcome scores evaluating perception of improvement related to the treatment procedure according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Short Form - Skin Feels: Skin Quality outcome are the result of increased perception of improvement and satisfaction.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in FACE-Q Short Form - Skin Looks: Skin Quality Scores
Time Frame: Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Change from baseline in selected FACE-Q Short Form - Skin Looks: Skin Quality patient-reported outcome scores evaluating perception of improvement related to the treatment procedure according to their respective scoring algorithms and the change from baseline. Higher scores in the FACE-Q® Short Form - Skin Looks: Skin Quality outcome are the result of increased perception of improvement and satisfaction.
Through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to rhPDGF-BB
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Incidence of anti-drug antibodies to rhPDGF-BB will be assessed. ADA titers (quantities) will also be characterized over time.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Incidence of Neutralizing Antibodies (NAb) to rhPDGF-BB
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Incidence of neutralizing antibodies to rhPDGF-BB. Confirmed ADA-positive samples will be evaluated for neutralizing activity (ability to affect the function of rhPDGF-BB) using a validated cell-based assay.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of rhPDGF-BB
Time Frame: Predose through Day 7 after treatment; repeated after retreatment, if applicable

Time to maximum observed plasma concentration (Tmax; ng/mL), max concentration (Cmax; ng/mL), measurable plasma concentrations (ng/mL) and, proportion of samples above the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; %) for rhPDGF-BB.
Predose through Day 7 after treatment; repeated after retreatment, if applicable
Change From Baseline in Infraorbital Volume
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Quantitative change from baseline in infraorbital tissue volume (cubic millimeters) will be measured using standardized three-dimensional VISIA-CR with PRIMOS imaging and centralized image analysis.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in Image Analysis-based Evaluation of Texture/Roughness
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Quantitative change from baseline in infraorbital skin parameter of texture/roughness (reported as a ratio) measured using standardized three-dimensional VISIA-CR with PRIMOS imaging and centralized image analysis.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)
Change From Baseline in Image Analysis-based Evaluation of Fine Lines/Wrinkles
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Quantitative change from baseline in infraorbital skin parameters of fine lines/wrinkles (reported as a ratio) measured using standardized three-dimensional VISIA-CR with PRIMOS imaging and centralized image analysis.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship Between Immunogenicity and Safety and Efficacy Outcomes
Time Frame: Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

The relationship between anti-drug antibody (ADA) and neutralizing antibody (NAb) status and safety and efficacy outcomes will be evaluated descriptively to characterize the potential clinical relevance of immunogenicity. An evaluation of potential relationship of development of antibodies to rhPDGF-BB and occurrence (number and relative timing) of treatment-emergent adverse events will be performed.
Baseline through 24 weeks after final treatment (up to Week 32)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lynch Regenerative Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 9, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 27, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LRM-PDGF-IOH-201

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) are not planned to be made publicly available or shared with external researchers. Study data will be maintained and disclosed as required by applicable regulatory requirements, the study protocol, and informed consent. Aggregate study results will be reported through ClinicalTrials.gov, as applicable, and may be included in scientific publications, presentations, and regulatory submissions.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings