Individualized Temporal Interference Stimulation for Reward Processing in Late-Life Depression

November 3, 2026 updated by: Xiang Yang Zhang, Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital

Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Modulation of Reward Processing by Individualized Temporal Interference Stimulation Targeting the Nucleus Accumbens in Late-Life Depression

This study aims to investigate the effects and neural mechanisms of individualized temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens in older adults with depression. A total of 70 participants aged 60-80 years will be randomly assigned to receive active TI or sham stimulation. Clinical and cognitive assessments, a probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task, MRI, and TMS-EEG will be used to evaluate changes in depressive symptoms, reward processing, and brain activity. Clinical and cognitive follow-up assessments will be conducted at 1 and 4 weeks after the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group study involving 70 adults aged 60-80 years who meet DSM-5 criteria for a current episode of major depressive disorder and have at least moderate depressive symptoms.

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an active TI group (n=35) or a sham stimulation group (n=35). Individualized TI will target the left nucleus accumbens, with stimulation administered for approximately 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

Clinical and neuropsychological assessments will evaluate depressive symptoms, anxiety, anhedonia, sleep, and cognitive function. A probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task will assess reward learning and cognitive flexibility. Structural MRI will support individualized stimulation planning, while resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and TMS-EEG will be used to investigate changes in brain networks and neurophysiological activity.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after the intervention, with additional follow-ups at 1 and 4 weeks. The study will compare changes between groups and explore associations among clinical outcomes, reward processing, and neural measures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 60-80 years.
  • Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for a current episode of major depressive disorder (MDD).
  • Have at least moderate depressive symptoms.
  • Able to understand and comply with study procedures, provide written informed consent, and voluntarily participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe neurological disorders or epilepsy.
  • Severe or unstable medical conditions.
  • Contraindications to MRI, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or transcranial electrical stimulation.
  • Comorbid severe psychiatric disorders, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.
  • Significant cognitive impairment that interferes with informed consent or completion of study procedures.
  • High suicide risk.
  • Any other medical or safety condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation inappropriate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Temporal Interference Stimulation

Participants will receive individualized active temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens, for 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

Individualized active temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens, delivered for 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

Sham Comparator: Sham Temporal Interference Stimulation

Participants will receive sham temporal interference stimulation (TI) with similar electrode placement and procedures, following the same schedule as the active group (10 sessions over five days).

Sham temporal interference stimulation (TI) with similar electrode placement and procedures, without sustained effective stimulation, following the same schedule as the active group (10 sessions over five days).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) assesses depressive symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Anhedonia will be assessed using the 14-item Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anhedonia. Changes from baseline will be compared between groups.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) Task
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

The PRL task assesses reward-based learning and cognitive flexibility. Participants learn from probabilistic feedback and adjust their choices when reward contingencies change. Task performance will be evaluated using behavioral measures of reward learning and reversal learning.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Anxiety severity will be assessed using the 14-item HAMA. Total scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses sleep quality and disturbances. The global score, calculated from seven components, ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Global cognitive function will be assessed using the MMSE. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Verbal learning and memory will be evaluated using the numbers of correctly recalled words during immediate recall, delayed recall, category-cued recall, and recognition testing.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Verbal Fluency Test (VF) Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Verbal fluency will be assessed using the numbers of valid responses generated during animal naming, phonemic word generation, and action fluency tasks, each lasting one minute.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
3D Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Delirium will be assessed using the 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-Defined Delirium (3D-CAM). The outcome will be recorded as the presence or absence of delirium.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Clock Drawing Test (CDT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Visuospatial and executive functioning will be assessed using a four-point Clock Drawing Test. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better performance.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Digit Span Test (DST) Performance
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Attention and working memory will be assessed using forward and backward digit span, including maximum correctly recalled span length and the number of correct sequences.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Processing speed, attention, and executive functioning will be evaluated using completion time in seconds across the four TMT conditions in the study protocol. Errors will also be recorded.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

The 12-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) assesses neuropsychiatric symptoms. The total score is calculated by summing frequency × severity scores across 12 domains and ranges from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Daily functioning will be assessed using the 20-item ADL scale. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups
Resting-State fMRI Brain Network Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Resting-state fMRI will be used to evaluate changes in nucleus accumbens-related functional connectivity and brain network characteristics following the intervention.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention
TMS-Evoked Global Mean Field Amplitude (GMFA)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Global mean field amplitude (GMFA) will be calculated from TMS-evoked EEG recordings to quantify the overall cortical response to stimulation. Changes in GMFA amplitude will be assessed.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention
TMS-EEG Time-Frequency Power
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Time-frequency analysis of TMS-EEG recordings will be used to assess changes in oscillatory power across frequency bands following stimulation.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention
TMS-EEG Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Functional connectivity will be assessed using TMS-EEG recordings to evaluate changes in the synchronization and interaction of cortical brain regions.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention
TMS-EEG Source-Localized Cortical Activity
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

EEG source reconstruction will be used to estimate changes in TMS-evoked cortical activity at the source level.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention
TMS-Evoked Potential (TEP) Amplitude
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be analyzed to assess changes in cortical responses, including the amplitude of TMS-evoked EEG components.

Baseline, immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiangyang Zhang, Ph.D, Tsinghua University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CASPsy13

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions (as they contain information that could compromise participant privacy), but will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request after completion of the study and approval by the ethics committee.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.