Continuous Passive Motion on Upper Limb Spasticity and Hand Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy (CPMCP)
Effect of Continuous Passive Movement on Upper Limb Spasticity and Hand Function in Children With Hemiplegia
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of Continuous passive motion (CPM) on upper limb spasticity and hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does continuous passive motion (CPM) have an effect on upper limb spasticity and hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy?
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a common underlying factor contributing to motor impairment in children. CP has frequently changed over the years. The most recent definition of CP is a collection of lasting irregularities in the development of movement and body positioning that result in activity restrictions for the affected person (Sadowska et al.,2020).
Hemiplegia is a neurological disorder that is frequently detected in children with CP. It may provoke altered selective motor control, weakness, and spasticity. While one side is affected by the disorder, the contralateral side appears to maintain complete functionality. The consequent asymmetry has been proven to affect many daily-life tasks, such as walking (DiNardo et al., 2019).
To date, little research examined the effect of Continuous passive motion (CPM) on functional impairment for upper extremity in CP children with hemiplegia. In addition to the economic changes in our society and increase of the cost of physical therapy session push us to investigate the immediate effect of physical therapy techniques and modalities and determine its validity in order to decrease physical therapy period and cost and improve its effectiveness.
Thus, outcomes of this study will be beneficial to determine the effect of CPM may be effective in the treatment of upper extremity in children with hemiplegia.
Statement of the problem:
Does continuous passive motion (CPM) have an effect on upper limb spasticity and hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy?
Purpose of the study:
The Purpose of the study was:
-
To evaluate the effect of Continuous passive motion (CPM) on upper limb spasticity in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
-
To evaluate hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The selected subjects will be divided randomly by sealed envelopes into two groups of equal number; thirty children for each group. Participants received 1 hour and 30 minutes per day, 3 days/week for 3 month.
- Study group :
Children of this group will receive specially designed physical therapy program and occupational therapy program in addition to continuous passive movement for the affected upper limb.
-control group : Children of this group will receive only specially designed physical therapy program and occupational therapy program.
Inclusive criteria:
The subjects will be included if:
- Their age will be ranged from 9-12 years.
- They are diagnosed with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
- The degree of spasticity; grade 2 according to modified Ashworth scale (Bohanon and Smith, 1987). (Appendix I)
- Manual ability to handle objects in daily activities will be at level III according to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) (Eliasson et al., 2006). (Appendix II)
- They will be able to understand orders given to them.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Eman Fathy Mohamed, Doctoral Degree
- Phone Number: +201124424650
- Email: doctoreman.fathy123@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Gehan Hassan El-Meniawy, Professor
- Phone Number: +201111801114
- Email: ggelmeniawy@Gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Giza, Egypt
- Faculty of physical therapy Dokki,Giza Egypt
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subjects will be included if:
- Their age will be ranged from 9 -12 years.
- They are diagnosed with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
- The degree of spasticity; grade 2 according to modified Ashworth scale (Bohanon and Smith, 1987). (Appendix I)
- Manual ability to handle objects in daily activities will be at level III according to Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) (Eliasson et al., 2006). (Appendix II)
- They will be able to understand orders given to them.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The subjects will be excluded if they:
- fixed deformities in the spine and/or upper extremities or suffering from Seizures.
- visual nor auditory problems.
- perceptual or cognitive problems.
- injected by BOTOX in deltoid or biceps brachii muscles at the last 6 months
- have surgical interference in upper limbs and/or spine at the last year.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: study group
-Study group: Children will receive specially designed physical therapy program + occupational therapy program in addition to continuous passive movement (CPM) for the affected upper limb. 1.5 hours/day, 3 days/week for 3 months. |
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Children will receive only the specially designed physical therapy program + occupational therapy program 1.5 hours/day, 3 days/week for 3 months. |
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hand functions
Time Frame: 45-60 minutes
|
Hand functions as manual dexterity, fine motor precision and fine motor integration will be assessed using Bruininks- Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2nd Edition |
45-60 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spasticity of upper limb
Time Frame: 10 minutes
|
Spasticity will be assessed using electromyographic apparatus (H/M ratio ) |
10 minutes
|
|
strength of biceps and deltoid
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Lafayette (hand held dynamometer) |
15 minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eman Fathy Mohamed, dectoral degree, El salam university
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- P.T.REC/012/005697
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.