Study of Erbitux™ (Cetuximab) in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

November 24, 2015 updated by: Eli Lilly and Company

Phase I Study of Erbitux™ (Cetuximab) in Pediatric Patients With Refractory Solid Tumors

The purpose of this clinical research study is to establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase II dose of Erbitux™ in combination with Irinotecan in pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory solid tumors.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
        • Phoenix Children's Hospital
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • University of Arizona Health Sciences Center
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • The Children's Hospital
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21231
        • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center Infectious Diseases
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University Of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Ctr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of a solid tumor which has progressed on, or following standard therapy, or for which no standard effective therapy is known.
  • Children age 1-18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active infection.
  • Requirement to receive concurrent chemotherapy immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or any other investigational drug while on study.
  • Inadequate bone marrow, hepatic, or renal function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group A
1-12 years old
Intravenous (IV) cetuximab 75 - 250 mg/m2 depending on dose escalation for MTD, weekly; irinotecan was administered at a dose of 16 or 20 mg/m2 or per dose escalation, administered x5 days x2 weeks, separated by 2 days off, every 21 days.
Intravenous (IV) cetuximab 75 - 250 mg/m2 depending on dose escalation for MTD, weekly; irinotecan was administered at a dose of 20 mg/m2 or per dose escalation, administered x5 days x2 weeks, separated by 2 days off, every 21 days.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Group B
13-18 years old
Intravenous (IV) cetuximab 75 - 250 mg/m2 depending on dose escalation for MTD, weekly; irinotecan was administered at a dose of 16 or 20 mg/m2 or per dose escalation, administered x5 days x2 weeks, separated by 2 days off, every 21 days.
Intravenous (IV) cetuximab 75 - 250 mg/m2 depending on dose escalation for MTD, weekly; irinotecan was administered at a dose of 20 mg/m2 or per dose escalation, administered x5 days x2 weeks, separated by 2 days off, every 21 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RPIID) of Cetuximab in Combination With Irinotecan
Time Frame: Continuous assessment of safety throughout the entire study period and determination of doe-limiting toxicities during and at the end of Cycle 1.
MTD of cetuximab intravenous (IV) weekly + irinotecan IV x5 days x2 weeks (in a 3-week cycle) and RPIID of cetuximab IV weekly, as measured by dose-limiting toxicities (see outcome measure 2)
Continuous assessment of safety throughout the entire study period and determination of doe-limiting toxicities during and at the end of Cycle 1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Dose-Limiting Toxicity
Time Frame: Prior to each 21-day cycle until dose-limiting toxicities
Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)=serious drug side effects preventing further dose escalation. If 1 of the first 3 subjects developed a DLT during cycle 1 up to 3 additional subjects were enrolled at that dose level. The maximum dose level at which DLTs occurred in fewer than 2 out of 3 to 6 subjects was defined as the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD).
Prior to each 21-day cycle until dose-limiting toxicities
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
The single dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; Cmax was evaluated based on concentration-time profile.
up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
Area Under the Curve, Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[INF])
Time Frame: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; AUC(INF) was evaluated based on concentration-time profile.
up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
Terminal Half-Life (T-Half)
Time Frame: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; T-half was evaluated based on concentration-time profile.
up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
Clearance Corrected for Body Surface Area (CL/BSA)
Time Frame: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; CL/BSA was evaluated based on concentration-time profile.
up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
Volume of Distribution at Steady State Corrected for Body Surface Area (VSS/BSA)
Time Frame: up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
The single dose PK of cetuximab was administered with an intravenous dose of irinotecan 16 to 20 mg/m2; VSS/BSA was evaluated based on concentration-time profile.
up to 168 hours after the start of the cetuximab infusion during the first 21-day cycle of the study
Tumor Response
Time Frame: Every other 21-day cycle
Non-central nervous system (CNS) tumors evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), criteria to define when cancer patients improve ("respond"), stay the same ("stable"), or worsen ("progression"). CNS tumors evaluated based on measurements by investigator, dependence on corticosteroids, and neurologic exam.
Every other 21-day cycle
Human Anti-cetuximab Antibody (HACA) Response
Time Frame: Blood was drawn immediately prior to cetuximab infusions, on a 21-day cycle
In order to be considered positive for anti-cetuximab a sample had to: 1) be evaluable (i.e., have a pre and at least one post-treatment timepoint), 2) have an anti-cetuximab value > 7 ng/mL and 3) have a post-treatment sample at least twice the pre-treatment level.
Blood was drawn immediately prior to cetuximab infusions, on a 21-day cycle
Number of Deaths, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: Weekly throughout the study and every 4 weeks thereafter
Toxicity assessments performed at least weekly from the 1st dose of study drug until at least 30 days after the final dose of study drug and thereafter every 4 weeks until all study-related toxicities resolved, returned to baseline, or were deemed irreversible, whichever was longer. Grade 3=severe AE; grade 4=disabling or life threatening.
Weekly throughout the study and every 4 weeks thereafter
Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Leukopenia
Time Frame: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE
pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Neutropenia
Time Frame: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe and undesirable AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE
pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Thrombocytopenia
Time Frame: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Blood samples collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE
pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Grade 3/4 Laboratory Abnormalities - Hypomagnesemia
Time Frame: pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment
Blood samples were collected at selected times (pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment) for clinical laboratory evaluations. Grade 3= Severe AE; Grade 4=Life-threatening or disabling AE
pretreatment visit, prior to each treatment cycle, weekly, and at the end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 9, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe