A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Asoprisnil in the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

May 27, 2008 updated by: Abbott

A Phase III, 12-Month, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of J867 Versus Placebo in Subjects With Uterine Leiomyomata.

The objective of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of asoprisnil in symptomatic women with abnormal uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

No medical therapy is currently available for the long-term treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in women and many women must resort to surgery for relief. The objective of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of asoprisnil 10 mg and 25 mg tablets, compared to placebo, administered daily for 12 months to women with abnormal uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids, by assessing whether asoprisnil administration prevents surgical and/or invasive intervention in the study population. Women, who meet the predefined uterine bleeding criteria for surgical and/or invasive intervention (hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization) who are willing to undergo surgical and/or invasive intervention if the study medication fails, will be enrolled in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

432

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premenopausal women
  • History of regular menstrual cycles (21-42 days)
  • Diagnosis of uterine fibroid(s)
  • Abnormal vaginal bleeding associated with uterine fibroids
  • Otherwise in good health
  • Agrees to undergo surgery (hysterectomy) or any other invasive procedure if the study medication fails
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Agrees to Double-barrier method of contraception
  • Pap smear with no evidence of malignancy or pre-malignant changes
  • Endometrial biopsy with no significant histological disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any abnormal lab or procedure result the study-doctor considers important
  • Severe reaction(s) to or are currently using any hormone therapy
  • History of osteoporosis or other bone disease
  • Previous myomectomy with 1 year and/or previous uterine artery embolization within 6 months
  • History of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome or prolactinoma
  • MRI shows significant gynecologic disorder
  • Uterine size > 25 weeks gestation
  • Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL at Day -1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
10mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 months
25 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 months
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
10mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 months
25 mg Tablet, oral Daily for 12 months
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: 3
Tablet, oral Daily for 12 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The percent of subjects who demonstrate a clinically meaningful improvement in bleeding and who do not require surgical/invasive intervention.
Time Frame: Month 12 or Final Visit
Month 12 or Final Visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percent change from baseline in volume of the largest fibroid.
Time Frame: Final Visit
Final Visit
Percent of subjects with clinically meaningful improvement in bleeding and who do not require surgical/invasive intervention.
Time Frame: Month 6
Month 6
Change from baseline in menstrual pictogram score.
Time Frame: Final Month
Final Month
Change from baseline in number of days with bleeding.
Time Frame: Final Month
Final Month
Change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration.
Time Frame: Final Visit
Final Visit
Change from baseline in bloating, pelvic pressure, dysmenorrhea and urinary symptoms.
Time Frame: Final Visit
Final Visit
Change from baseline in total symptom severity score and UFS-QOL total score.
Time Frame: Final Visit
Final Visit
Cumulative percent of subjects who achieve amenorrhea.
Time Frame: Month 3
Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2002

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2005

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 29, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2008

Last Verified

May 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metrorrhagia

Clinical Trials on Asoprisnil

3
Subscribe