Treatment of Mature B-cell Lymphoma/Leukaemia

March 27, 2012 updated by: Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Treatment of Mature B-cell Lymphoma/Leukaemia A SFOP LMB 96/CCG 5961/UKCCSG NHL 9600 Cooperative Study

This is an international trial conducted by three cooperative groups: SFOP (France, Belgium, Netherlands), CCG (USA, Canada, Australia), and UKCCSG (UK and Ireland). Children with mature B-cell lymphoma/leukaemia are stratified into three different risk groups (A, B, C) and receive treatment of progressive intensity. Randomized trials in the 2 biggest groups (B and C) test whether "reduced" therapy is equivalent to standard intensive therapy (LMB-89 B and C) in terms of event free survival. The reason for the modification is to reduce the long term toxicity which includes cardiotoxicity, impaired fertility and secondary malignancy. In group B, the modifications of treatment consists of a reduction of cyclophosphamide in COPADM2 and/or the elimination of COPADM3. In group C, the modification consists in a reduction of the doses in the CYVE courses and the elimination of the last 3 courses of maintenance treatment

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Group B: Randomized trial with factorial design. The 4 treatment arms are standard LMB89 therapy B, reduction of cyclophosphamide (CPM) in COPADM2, deletion of COPADM3, both reduction and deletion. Randomization occurs following COPADM1 and is stratified for national group, histology (large cell; small non cleaved cell) and stage (Murphy I orII; Murphy III+LDH<2N; Murphy III+LDH>2N or Murphy IV).

The primary analysis questions are whether reducing CPM dose in COPADM2 results in a smaller long-term EFS whether omitting COPADM3 results in a smaller long-term EFS

Group C: Randomized trial. The 2 treatment arms are standard LMB89 therapy C versus reduction of CYVE + deletion of the last 3 maintenance courses. Randomization occurs following COPADM2 and is stratified for national group, histology (large cell; small non cleaved cell) and CNS disease.

The primary analysis question is whether reducing CYVE and omitting the last 3 maintenance courses result in a smaller long-term EFS than standard LMB 89 treatment C

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

848

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Villejuif, France, 94800
        • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • United Kingdom
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Sheffield Children's Hospital
  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
        • Morgan Stanley Childrens Hospital of New York Presbyterian

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 20 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed B lineage non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with Revised European American Lymphoma (REAL) II 9 (diffuse large cell lymphoma), 10 (Burkitt's lymphoma), or 11 (high grade B cell lymphoma, Burkitt's like) or bone marrow > 5% L3 blasts.
  • Pre treatment imaging studies adequate to document Murphy disease stage
  • Group B and C patients are eligible for randomization (Therapy stratification by group : Group A=completely resected stage I or completely resected abdominal stage II lesions, Group B= All cases not eligible for Group A or Group C, Group C= Any CNS involvement and/or bone marrow involvement ³ 25% blasts)
  • Patients should be available for a minimum follow up of 36 months
  • Informed consent prior to study entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anaplastic large cell Ki 1 positive lymphomas
  • Previous chemotherapy.
  • Congenital immunodeficiency
  • Prior organ transplantation
  • Previous malignancy of any type
  • Known HIV positivity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Standard LMB B
Drug: LMB B
EXPERIMENTAL: LMB B without COPADM3
Drug: without COPADM3
EXPERIMENTAL: LMB B with half cyclophosphamide
Drug: half cyclophosphamide
EXPERIMENTAL: LMB B without COPADM3 and with half cyclophosphamide
Drug: without COPADM3
Drug: half cyclophosphamide
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: LMB C standard
Drug: LMB C
EXPERIMENTAL: LMB C with mini CYVE and without 3 maintenance courses
Drug: mini CYVE, without 3 maintenance courses

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event free survival
Time Frame: 3 years
Event free survival (event = progressive disease or relapse or second malignancy or death from any cause)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
long term toxicity
Time Frame: 10 years
long term toxicity: cardiotoxicity, impaired fertility, secondary malignancy
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mitchell S Cairo, MD, Morgan Stanley Childrens Hospital of New York Presbyterian, Columbia University
  • Principal Investigator: Mary Gerrard, MD, Sheffield Children's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 1996

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2004

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2005

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 13, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FAB LMB96

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe