"DOES MYOBLOC™ IMPROVE FUNCTIONAL HAND USE IN YOUNG CHILDREN WITH A HYPERTONIC UPPER EXTREMITY?"

October 11, 2005 updated by: Stanford University
In children with cerebral palsy, stiffness of the arm can develop early and delay or prevent the acquisition of normal hand skills. Improvement in functional use of the hand may therefore be dependent upon early treatment of upper extremity hypertonia. We propose to test a series of injections of Myobloc™ in a non-randomized one-way crossover pilot clinical trial and dose-finding study, with clinical assessments and blinded video evaluations. Ten children age 2-17 years with increased tone at the elbow or wrist will be expected to complete the study. A 1-month baseline evaluation period will be followed by an injection of low-dose Myobloc™ to affected muscle(s) of the arm according to standardized per-kilogram dosing with a maximum of 25U/kg in each affected arm. Three months later, a second injection of up to 50U/kg will be performed in each affected arm. Three months after the second dose, a third dose of up to 100U/kg will be performed in each affected arm. Neurological assessments will be performed at study entry, prior to each injection, and at 1 and 3 months following each injection. Routine physical therapy and non-study medications will be continued during the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects: 10 subjects age 2-17 years with hypertonia affecting one or both upper extremities, but without injections of neuromuscular blocking agents for six months prior to enrollment, or surgery on the upper extremity.

Intervention: Injection of Myobloc™ in 2 sites per muscle for up to two muscles of each upper extremity (biceps, brachioradialis), at a maximum dose of 25Units/kg/arm for the first injection, a maximum of 50Units/kg/arm for the second injection, and a maximum of 100Units/kg/arm for the third injection. If there is significant weakness or worsening of function following any injection, the dose will not be increased for subsequent injections. Injections will be performed after placement of topical anesthetic (ELA-MAX™ cream), using EMG guidance to identify active muscles contributing to hypertonia.

Primary outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the time it takes to complete maximum arm extension during voluntary reaching, measured from the coraco-acromial joint to the midpoint of the dorsum of the wrist. Change scores will be calculated between intake and 1 month (baseline effect), 1 month and 2 months (first injection effect), 4 months and 5 months (second injection effect), and 7 months and 8 months (third injection effect). A device called a Shape Tape (Measureand, Inc.) will be used to measure this outcome. Shape Tape is a flexible strip of portable spring steel with optic fiber that provides instantaneous readouts to a portable computer of bends and twists and other forms of movement capture that can be conducted in a clinical setting. The Shape Tape is fastened loosely to the body part under measurement (in this case, the subject's wrist and shoulder) with either medical-grade adhesive tape or Velcro. The shapetape is connected to a portable computer, and custom software allows measurement of the average velocity of hand movement during reaching.

Secondary outcome measures: The rater will compare improvement or worsening in global arm function through the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS), the motor subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale (UPDRS), and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia scale (BFM). Comparisons will be performed between intake and 1 month (baseline effect), 1 month and 2 months (first injection effect), 4 months and 5 months (second injection effect), and 7 months and 8 months (third injection effect). Other secondary measures include neurological examination, Ashworth spasticity scale, and comparisons of numerical stiffness measures as measured by the Rigidity Analyzer Device. A parent rating scale, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), will be used to determine overall functional improvement.

Statistical analysis: The outcomes will be tested at the 0.05 level of significance using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Friedman nonparametric test applied to the 4 repeated change scores for each of the primary and secondary outcome measures. Tests of significance for the secondary measures will be corrected for multiple comparisons.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

10

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305-5235
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age 2- 17 years 2. Hypertonia affecting one or both upper extremities 3. Hypertonia caused by static encephalopathy due to prenatal or perinatal injury 4. Cognitive and motor function sufficient so that the child will reliably reach toward a target or a small toy 5. Concurrent enrollment in "standard of care" physical therapy or occupational therapy services

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Injection of neuromuscular blocking agents to any extremity within six months prior to enrollment 2. Dose changes of trihexyphenidyl, dantrolene, baclofen, dopaminergic agents or benzodiazepines during the course of the study.

    3. Any use of aminoglycoside antibiotics during the study. 4. Prior surgery to either upper extremity 5. Initiation or change in physical or occupational therapy regimen within 3 months of study entry 6. Progressive or neurodegenerative disease, or suspicion of an inborn error of metabolism 7. Neuropathy, myopathy, or neuromuscular junction disease 8. Congenital deformities of either upper extremity 9. Respiratory or airway compromise, or use of respiratory medications 10. Cardiomyopathy 11. Any other medical condition that would place the child at risk for participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The primary outcome measure is the time it takes to complete maximum arm extension during voluntary reaching, measured from the coraco-acromial joint to the midpoint of the dorsum of the wrist.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The rater will compare improvement or worsening in global arm function through the Unified Dystonia Rating Scale (UDRS), the motor subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale (UPDRS), and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia scale (BFM). Compar

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Terence Sanger, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Study Completion

May 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2005

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2005

Last Verified

October 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin type B

3
Subscribe