Near-Continuous, Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric Transport

April 3, 2012 updated by: University of Arkansas
A randomized controlled trial compared the clinical outcomes of transported pediatric patients monitored with an oscillometric blood pressure device versus those monitored with a near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

94 transported patients were randomized to a control arm, monitored with a standard oscillometric blood pressure device (Dinamap), or an experimental arm, monitored with a near-continuous, noninvasive blood pressure device (Vasotrac).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
        • Arkansas Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Pediatric patients transported by Angel One to Arkansas Children's Hospital.
  2. Age Group: 1 year - 17 years AND
  3. Patients at risk of developing SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), according to the criteria below.

    i. The presence of at least two of the following four criteria (one of which must be abnormal temperature or leukocyte count): A. Core temperature of >38.5 C or <36 C. B. Tachycardia, defined as mean heart rate >95th percentile for age in absence of external stimulus, chronic drugs, or painful stimuli.

    C. Mean respiratory rate >95th percentile for age, or >10% immature neutrophils.

    OR

  4. Patients with moderate or severe head trauma, at risk of developing secondary ischemic brain injury, according to the criteria below.

    i. Glasgow Coma scale <15 with one or more of the following: A. Mass lesion or cerebral edema on CT or MRI scan. B. Post-Traumatic Seizure. C. Multiple Trauma. D. Focal Neurologic Signs. E. Intubation for control of suspected intracranial hypertension.

    -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Wrist circumference less than 11cm (minimum size for the Vasotrac device).
  2. Contractures of the wrists, not allowing correct placement of the Vasotrac device.
  3. Hematoma(s) located on both wrists from recent redial (<24hr) artery puncture.
  4. Patients likely to proceed to brain death per assessment of the referring physician.
  5. Patients being treated for malignant hypertension.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring
Patients received continuous blood pressure monitoring the entire time they were in med flight to the hospital.
Continuous blood pressure monitoring of patients during med flight to hospital
Placebo Comparator: Standard of care blood pressure monitoring
Patients received the normal standard of care for blood pressure monitoring during the course of the med flight to the hospital.
Patients received the standard of care for blood pressure monitoring while en route to the hospital via med flight.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Difference in Hospital Length of Stay Between Those Who Received Continuous Blood Pressure Monitoring and Those Who Received Standard of Care
Time Frame: Up to two weeks
This is the total number of participants analyzed for the intervention group and the total number of participants analyzed for the control group and the total number of days that each group was analyzed overall.
Up to two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay
Time Frame: Up to two weeks
Up to two weeks
Total Number of Organ Failure Days (Multiple Organ Dysfunction) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)for the Control Group and Total Number of Organ Failure Days for the Intervention Group. Multiple Organ Dysfunction is Defined as Multiple Organ Failure.
Time Frame: Up to two weeks
Total number of organ failure days is for each group as a whole.
Up to two weeks
Mean Daily Score Using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) Scale.
Time Frame: Up to two weeks
The Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) is an illness severity score for the ICU. The TISS score can range from zero up to 78. The higher the score is, the more severe the illness. The TISS-28 scale measures the severity of a patient's illness.
Up to two weeks
Amount of Intravenous Fluid Resuscitation
Time Frame: At start of inter-facility transport, then every 15 minutes until arrival.
At start of inter-facility transport, then every 15 minutes until arrival.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Stroud, MD, University of Arkansas

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 19, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 48082
  • CUMG Grant

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Patients With SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome)

Clinical Trials on Continuous blood pressure monitoring using (Dinamap) standard oscillometric blood pressure device

3
Subscribe