Is Botox Effective in Relieving Pain From Knee Osteoarthritis?

November 6, 2012 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Intra-articular Botulinum Toxin Type-A in Knee Osteoarthritis - a Randomized, Cortisone Controlled, Double Blind Study.

Patients with painful knee osteoarthritis will be randomly allocated to one of three groups. Each group will receive a knee injection of: 1) cortisone, 2) low dose Botox, or 3) high dose Botox. Patients will then be followed for 6 months to see if they have significant pain relief or improvement in their activity level after the injection.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Abstract Botulinum toxin type A (Btx-A) has been extensively studied and used clinically for its muscle paralyzing effects, but there is a growing body of evidence to support a role in pain modulation. Symptomatic osteoarthritis is a leading cause of pain, functional impairment, and disability, with significant indirect costs to society. Preliminary evidence suggests that Btx-A has a significant nociceptive effect, when injected intra-articularly, in to painful joints. The proposed study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Btx-A injected intra-articularly in 60 subjects with moderate pain and functional impairment secondary to knee osteoarthritis, in a randomized, cortisone-controlled, double blind study, over a 6 month follow up period. If Btx-A is shown to be of equal or greater efficacy than cortisone in this patient population, it may be an excellent second line treatment for osteoarthritis, in multiple joints, where surgery is contraindicated or deferred due to age, comorbidities, or patient preference. Further studies examining the mechanism of action at the biochemical level, the clinical effect of Btx-A in other joints (in both osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis), the efficacy of Btx-A compared to hyaluronic acid (the only currently available injectable alternative to cortisone), and the side effect profile (effect on adjacent muscle strength, joint position sense, and long-term outcomes) would be indicated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. A history of knee joint pain for greater than 6 months.
  2. Medial or lateral tibiofemoral joint line tenderness.
  3. Unilateral knee pain 6/10 or greater, on average, on the visual analog scale (VAS), that interferes with function most days per week.
  4. Prior failed treatment with acetaminophen and/or non steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and physical therapy (quadriceps strengthening).
  5. Kellgren grade II or III radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Age less than 40 years.
  2. Anticoagulation with warfarin or heparin.
  3. Known allergy or sensitivity to any of the components of the study medications.
  4. Body mass index greater than 35.
  5. Previous major reconstructive surgery on the affected knee.
  6. Previous arthroscopic surgery on the affected knee in the past 12 months.
  7. History of crystal induced arthropathy.
  8. Use of aminoglycoside antibiotics, curare-like agents, or history of neuromuscular disease such as myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or myopathy.
  9. History of or evidence of active rheumatologic disease, diabetes, severe peripheral neuropathy, clinically evident cardiac or respiratory disease that interferes with functional status, or other serious diseases, including psychiatric disorders.
  10. Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse, or history of medication misuse or addiction.
  11. Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning a pregnancy during the study, or who think that they may be pregnant at the start of the study, or females of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use a reliable form of contraception during the study.
  12. Intra-articular (knee) or systemic steroids in the past 6 months, or intra-articular knee hyaluronic acid injection in the past 6 months.
  13. Patients who rate their average daily pain as less than 6 on a 10 point VAS scale at the screening visit.
  14. Concurrent participation in another investigational drug or device study or participation in the 30 days immediately prior to study enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cortisone
1 cc of 40 mg/cc methylprednisolone will be drawn up in 22 gauge needles with 3 cc of sterile non-preserved 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
Other Names:
  • Medrol
Experimental: Low Dose Btx-A
Participants randomized to Btx-A will be given either a low dose of 100 units or a high dose of 200 units. The Btx-A dose (100U or 200U) will be resonstituted with 4 cc of sterile non-preserved 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
Other Names:
  • Botox
Experimental: High Dose Btx-A
Participants randomized to Btx-A will be given either a low dose of 100 units or a high dose of 200 units. The Btx-A dose (100U or 200U) will be resonstituted with 4 cc of sterile non-preserved 0.9% sodium chloride solution.
Other Names:
  • Botox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Decrease in pain at 8 weeks post injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Improvement in function at 2, 4, 8, 12, 26 weeks
Improvement in quality of life at 2, 4, 8, 12, 26 weeks
Decrease in pain at 2, 4, 12, 26 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea J. Boon, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

January 20, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2012

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on Cortisone

3
Subscribe