Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of DFV890 in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

March 27, 2026 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Randomized, Two-arm, Placebo-controlled, Participant and Investigator-blinded Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of DFV890 in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

This was a double-blinded, two-arm, phase 2a study to assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of DFV890 in participants with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of the Phase 2a proof of concept study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of DFV890 in participants with symptomatic knee OA, and to determine the efficacy of DFV890 in reducing knee pain as evidenced by change in KOOS (knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score). The study had a screening period up to 45 days, a treatment period of 12 weeks and a 4-week follow-up period. At most, the study duration was 21 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

115

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina, 4000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Buenos Aires
      • CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1181ACH
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tucumán Province
      • San Miguel, Tucumán Province, Argentina, T4000CBC
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nový Jičín, Czechia, 741 01
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Prague, Czechia, 150 06
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Uherské Hradiště, Czechia, 686 01
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Czech Republic
      • Brno, Czech Republic, Czechia, 66250
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bad Doberan, Germany, 18209
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany, 10787
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22415
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany, 22143
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04107
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1027
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Miskolc, Hungary, 3526
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Veszprém, Hungary, 8200
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Bács-Kiskun county
      • Kecskemét, Bács-Kiskun county, Hungary, 6044
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bucharest, Romania, 011658
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Cluj
      • Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania, 400006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nové Mesto nad Váhom, Slovakia, 915 01
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Piešťany, Slovakia, 921 01
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • A Coruña, Spain, 15006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Seville, Spain, 41010
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain, 08208
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08003
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85015
        • ARENSIA Explor Med Res Clinic
    • California
      • El Cajon, California, United States, 92020
        • TriWest Reserach Associates
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States, 80917
        • Skylight Health Res Inc Color Spr
    • Florida
      • Plantation, Florida, United States, 33324
        • IRIS Research and Development
      • Winter Park, Florida, United States, 32789
        • Conquest Research
    • Georgia
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • Ctr for Adv Research and Education
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants >= 50 and <= 80 years old on the day of Informed Consent signature.
  • Participants must weigh at least 50 kg to participate in the study, and must have a body mass index (BMI) within the range of 18 - 35 kg/m2 at screening. BMI = Body weight (kg) / [Height (m)]2
  • High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) >=1.8 mg/L at screening
  • Symptomatic OA with pain (corresponding to Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] 5-9, inclusive) in the target knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to screening
  • KOOS pain sub-scale score <= 60 in index knee at screening and baseline
  • Radiographic disease: K&L grade 2 or 3 knee osteoarthritis in the target knee, confirmed by X-ray at screening.
  • Active synovial inflammation at screening (defined a summary score of ≥7 with at least one region scoring 2) on contrast enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) of the whole knee for synovitis detection from 11 sites.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Total WBC count < 3,000/µL, absolute peripheral blood neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,000/µL, hemoglobin < 8.5 g/dL (85 g/L) or platelet count < 100,000/µL at Screening
  • Known autoimmune disease with inflammatory arthritis (including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus erythematosus), crystal-induced arthritis (gout, pseudogout associated arthritis), active acute or chronic infection or past infection of the knee joint, Lyme disease involving the knee, reactive arthritis, systemic cartilage disorders, moderate to severe fibromyalgia (widespread pain index, WPI, >4 out of 19), or a known systemic connective tissue disease
  • Any known active infections, including skin or knee infections or infections that may compromise the immune system, such as HIV or chronic hepatitis B or C infection. COVID-19 specific: PCR or antigen test against COVID-19 is mandatory where required by the local Health Authority and/or by local regulation, e.g. in Germany.
  • Use of prohibited medications: any local i.a. treatment into the knee, including but not restricted to viscosupplementation and corticosteroids within 12 weeks prior to Day 1; long-term treatment (>14 days) with oral corticosteroids >5 mg/day within 4 weeks prior to Day 1; oral glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, or any nutraceutical with potential activity on cartilage repairfrom screening 1; systemic Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), selective Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX- 2) inhibitors or other non-opioid analgesics not defined as basic pain medication within 5 half-lives from PRO assessments; any other immunomodulatory drugs or treatment which cannot be discontinued or switched to a different medication within 28 days or 5 half-lives of screening (whichever is longer if required by local regulations), or until the expected PD effect has returned to baseline.
  • Moderate to severe pain in the contralateral knee for the majority of days in the last 3 months prior to Screening, as per patient judgment.
  • Severe malalignment greater than 7.5 degrees in the target knee (either varus or valgus), measured using x-ray at Screening.

Additional protocol-defined inclusion / exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DFV890
DFV890 was administered orally twice per day, 10 mg during 2 weeks and 25 mg during the next 10 weeks.
DFV890 was administered orally twice per day, 10 mg during 2 weeks and 25 mg during the next 10 weeks.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching Placebo was administered orally twice per day during 12 weeks.
Matching Placebo was administered orally twice per day during 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the pain frequency/severity during functional activities consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS pain score was analyzed using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Synovitis Activity Level Measured From Ktrans by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI)
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained from the target knee with dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) to visualize and quantify changes in k-trans as a marker of the activity of synovial inflammation. In dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, ktrans is a parameter that reflects how quickly contrast agent moves from blood vessels into the surrounding tissue, capturing both blood flow and vascular permeability. In synovitis, inflamed synovial tissue shows increased perfusion and leaky microvasculature, so higher k-trans values are interpreted as indicating more active synovial inflammation. Change from baseline in synovitis activity level measured from ktrans was analyzed to compare treatment groups. The model included treatment as fixed effect and baseline as continuous covariate. Ktrans is a marker of synovial inflammation in relation to vascularity permeability.
Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Serum High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Level
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
HsCRP is a protein produced by the liver in response to inflammation in the body, such as from an infection, injury, or chronic inflammatory conditions. HsCRP was used to assess the effect of DFV890 compared to placebo on systemic inflammatory status.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Counts (ANC)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
ANC measures the number of neutrophils, a type of white blood cell crucial for fighting infection, in a blood sample. ANC was used to judge target engagement of DFV890.
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of DFV890
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
Cmax is defined as the maximum (peak) observed concentration following a dose. DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Measurable Concentration Sampling Time (AUClast) of DFV890
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
AUClast is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration (tlast). DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
Area Under Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 12 Hours (AUC0-12h) of DFV890
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
AUC(0-12h) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hours. To calculate AUC0-12h (corresponding to AUCtau, or AUC within a dosing interval), the concentration at 0 hours was used also as a 12 hours time point or, if not feasible, AUC0-12h was extrapolated. DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose, 1h, 3h, 5h, 8h
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of DFV890
Time Frame: Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose
DFV890 plasma concentrations were determined using the actual recorded sampling times and non-compartmental method with Phoenix WinNonlin (Version 8). DFV890 was determined by a validated LC-MS/MS method; the anticipated lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) is 1 ng/mL.
Week 2 and Week 12: pre-dose
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Other Symptoms Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is other symptoms (eg., stiffness, swelling, clicking) consisting of 7 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in other symptoms score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Daily Living Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the Function in Daily Living consisting of 17 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on function in daily living and 0 indicating extreme impact on function in daily living) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS daily living function score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Function in Sport and Recreation Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the function in sport and recreation consisting of 5 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on sport and recreation and 0 indicating extreme impact on sport and recreation) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in function in sport and recreation score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Knee-related Quality of Life (QOL) Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is the knee-related quality of life consisting of 4 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no impact on knee-related quality of life and 0 indicating extreme impact on knee-related quality of life) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in knee related quality of life score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8
The KOOS questionnaire is a commonly used instrument to assess the patient's perception about their knee and associated problems. The original KOOS consists of 5 subscales. One of those is pain frequency/severity during functional activities consisting of 9 questions with a recall of 7 days. Each question has 5 standardized answer options with a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no pain and 0 indicating extreme pain) is calculated for each subscale. Change from baseline in KOOS pain score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain is a subjective assessment in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. NRS pain score ranges from 0-10 and for analyses were transformed to a 0-100 scale to be consistent with KOOS pain scores. A negative change from baseline implied improvement in pain. The NRS Pain instrument had a recall period of 24 hours and the participants were asked to rate the pain intensity at its worst. Change from baseline in NRS pain score was analyzed using a MMRM including all time-points to compare treatment groups. The model includes baseline, treatment, timepoint, baseline-by-timepoints interaction and treatment-by-timepoints interaction as fixed effects. Missing data is assumed to be Missing at Random (MAR).
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CDFV890B12201
  • 2020-006104-17 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.

This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on DFV890

Subscribe