Evaluation of a Preoperative Education in Total Knee Arthroplasty (EPOP)

December 11, 2012 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

The benefit of preoperative rehabilitation treatment combining physiotherapy and targeted education for patient undergoing Total Knee replacement (TKR) is now well known. Thus, there is lack of validated booklet containing evidence based informations.

Our aim is to assess the impact of an evidence based education pre-operative booklet on patient's knowledge and beliefs. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of the booklet on patient's satisfaction on the information received, the length of stay in orthopedic surgery and the transfer rate to rehabilitation wards.

To show a difference of 2 points on the knowledge score (range 0-10) between the two groups, with a = 0.05 and a power of 90%, we considered that 44 patients are needed. The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test.

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethic Committee.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The benefit of preoperative rehabilitation treatment combining physiotherapy and targeted education for patient undergoing Total Knee replacement (TKR) is now well known. Thus, there is lack of validated booklet containing evidence based informations.

Our aim is to assess the impact of an evidence based education pre-operative booklet on patient's knowledge and beliefs. The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of the booklet on patient's satisfaction on the information received, the length of stay in orthopedic surgery and the transfer rate to rehabilitation wards.

To show a difference of 2 points on the knowledge score (range 0-10) between the two groups, with a = 0.05 and a power of 90%, we considered that 44 patients are needed. The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test.

The study protocol was approved by the local Ethic Committee.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Chu Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ranging from 55 to 75 Planned total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 55 or above 75 Patients institutionalized Patients who have received a total knee arthroplasty of the ipsilateral knee Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or assignee) Patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatism Cognitive and behavioral issues Disorders of understanding and expression of the French language TKR on complex knee

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters
The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test
Other: Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters
Other: Fisher exact test
The evaluations will take place at baseline, the day before surgery and 6 weeks post-surgery on knowledge and beliefs scores at each visit and on a satisfaction score on the last one. Quantitative data will be compared between groups by the Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters via Fisher exact test
Other: Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
knowledge score
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Primary disability
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Duration of hospitalization surgery
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Transfer rate in acute care and rehabilitation, and length of stay
Time Frame: at week 6
at week 6
Patient's overall satisfaction towards the information received
Time Frame: at week 6
at week 6
Patient's confidence in its own ability to achieve rehabilitation
Time Frame: at day-1
at day-1
Patient's knowledge and beliefs about his condition
Time Frame: Baseline, at day-1 and week 6
Baseline, at day-1 and week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Collaborators

Sanofi

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stéphane DESCAMPS, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHU-0133

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)

Clinical Trials on Kruskal-Wallis and qualitative parameters

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Kosovo

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe