Treatment of Executive Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease

October 2, 2017 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Open-label Study

Atomoxetine (Strattera) is a drug that is currently approved for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. Atomoxetine works to enhance levels of brain chemicals that may be affected in people with executive dysfunction, (difficulties with organization, task completion, and priority setting). Thus, atomoxetine has the potential to improve executive dysfunction in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).

The goal of this study is to provide preliminary data on the effectiveness and tolerability of atomoxetine for the treatment of executive dysfunction in patients with PD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD), while defined by its motor abnormalities and associated dopaminergic loss, is invariably accompanied by cognitive impairment. Early in the disease course, the deficits are characterized by executive dysfunction with difficulties on tasks that involve information processing, attention, sorting, planning, set-shifting, and working memory and are subserved by neural connections with prefrontal brain regions. There has been little effort to identify treatments for these PD-related cognitive impairments, despite their disabling and distressing effects. Accordingly, the goal of this proposal is to conduct a small pilot study to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, for the treatment of executive dysfunction in patients with PD.

Atomoxetine (Strattera) is currently approved by the FDA for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. Atomoxetine enhances dopaminergic and noradrenergic transmission in frontal regions that are also implicated in executive dysfunction and thus has the potential to improve executive dysfunction in PD as well as other neurological conditions. Results of the study will be used to develop a larger placebo-controlled trial of atomoxetine, if appropriate, as well as inform the design of other clinical trials on potential treatments for cognitive dysfunction in PD.

The overall hypothesis is that atomoxetine will be an effective and safe treatment for executive dysfunction in PD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease, as defined by United Kingdom (UK) Brain Bank Criteria.
  2. Adults, ages 21 to 65 years old.
  3. Clinically significant executive dysfunction, as defined by the reported presence of problems with disorganization, distractibility, task completion, planning or problem solving that represents a decline from premorbid (pre-PD) status and is confirmed by the patient's informant.
  4. Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score > 26.
  5. Absence of Dementia due to Parkinson's Disease, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IVth edition-Text revision (DSM-IV-TR).
  6. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale score < 1.
  7. Functional Assessment Staging (FAST) score < 4.
  8. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) Score < 11.
  9. Able to provide informed consent and participate in follow-up visits during the 8-week study duration.
  10. Availability of informant who knows the patient well and is willing to provide collateral information on the patient's clinical status and response to treatment.
  11. On stable antiparkinsonian therapy for 3 months.
  12. Any stage of PD severity, e.g., Hoehn and Yahr stage I-V, but must be able to participate in testing battery and be capable of independent function so as to manifest executive dysfunction.
  13. Stable medical health with stable medication regimen for 3 months.
  14. If history of major depression or anxiety disorder, must have stable symptoms and be on stable therapy for 3 months.
  15. For women of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test and reliable use of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior exposure to atomoxetine within the last 6 months.
  2. Current problems with urinary hesitancy or urinary retention.
  3. Uncontrolled hypertension or tachycardia.
  4. Narrow angle glaucoma.
  5. Current presence of hallucinations without insight or uncontrolled delusions (patients with benign visual hallucinations of any sensory modality with insight, e.g., passage or presence hallucinations, or controlled stable delusions will be enrolled).
  6. Illicit substance use or alcohol abuse or dependence within the last 6 months.
  7. Current symptomatic Major Depressive Disorder or Anxiety Disorder that warrants additional treatment, as assessed on clinical interview, or 21-item Hamilton Depression Scale > 10.
  8. For women, current pregnancy or nursing.
  9. Current use of potent CYP2D6 inhibitors, e.g., paroxetine, fluoxetine, quinidine.
  10. Current use of stimulant or wakefulness therapy, e.g., methylphenidate or modafinil.
  11. Current hepatic dysfunction, defined as values of two times or greater than the upper limit of normal on the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) hepatic enzymes or any disorder affecting the liver that in the opinion of the enrolling investigator would interfere with hepatic metabolism of the medication or interfere with the participant's ability to complete the study.
  12. Current use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors that are typically used for treatment of depression (isocarboxazid, phenelzine, and tranylcypromine).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Atomoxetine (Strattera)
Open-Label Uncontrolled Active Drug Intervention, No comparator
Open Label uncontrolled active Drug intervention
Other Names:
  • Strattera (Brand Name)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression of Change-Clinician Rated Score (CGIC-C)
Time Frame: 8 weeks

CGIC-C score is a clinician's rating of change (improvement or worsening) over the course of the trial in an individual's symptoms and their global impact on function and clinical status, i.e., the global impact of the intervention that the patient is better, unchanged, or worse). Scale ranges1 to 7 which equates to from very much worse to very much improved.

The CGIC-C score is not an appropriate baseline measure since it represents change after initiating an intervention. In addition, a baseline Clinical Global Impression of Severity-Clinician Rated Score (CGIS-C) is not appropriate to compare to CGIC-C, as a patient with severe disease might show clinically meaningful improvement (i.e., very much improved) from an intervention while still being severely affected on the CGIS-C score; by contrast, a patient with mild CGIS-C could have minimal or no change on the CGIC-C score. This study was not designed to assess the influence of disease severity on the primary outcome (CGIC-C).

8 weeks
Connors Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Rating Scale-Long Form (CAARS-L) Inattention/Memory Subscale
Time Frame: baseline and 8 weeks
The CAARS-L Inattention/Memory subscale, a primary self-rated outcome measure in this study, measures the frequency of behaviors associated with executive dysfunction, such as task incompletion, disorganization, distractibility, and difficulty planning, multi-tasking, and initiating tasks. CAARS-L scores are depicted as group Mean (SD) T scores, derived from comparison to CAARS norms based on gender and age in a normative sample. Similar to the FrSBE, higher T-scores are associated with greater symptom severity and T-scores above 65 represent symptoms of clinical significance.
baseline and 8 weeks
Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale (FrSBe) Executive Function Subscore
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale (FrSBe) Executive Function subscore is on of the 3 subscales of the FrSBE, a scale designed to identify and quantify behavioral problems associated with frontal lobe dysfunction. The other subscales are Apathy and Disinhibition. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Totals are generated for each subscale and normative data is referenced (based on patient gender, age and education) and standardized T-scores are determined). For all FrSBe scales, T scores ≥ 65 are considered clinically significant and scores of 60 to 64 represent likely borderline impairment.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Marsh, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 6, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Atomoxetine

3
Subscribe