Evaluation of Vitamin D Requirements During Pregnancy

August 9, 2016 updated by: Carol Wagner, Medical University of South Carolina
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy starting at the beginning of the second trimester. Mothers will be randomized to one of three vitamin D dosing groups: 400, 2,000 or 4,000 international units per day. It is hypothesized that the highest dosing regimen will result in a better vitamin D status of women regardless of their ethnicity or race.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D in reproductive aged African-American women occurs at a rate of > 40%. Two factors have contributed to this public health problem: an inadequate DRI for vitamin D and avoidance of sun exposure/use of sunscreen. This startling rate of hypovitaminosis D requires that the DRI for vitamin D in pregnancy be evaluated in a detailed manner. The Cochrane Library (2002) released a report stating that there is insufficient data to evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Recently, the safety of prolonged supplementation with up to 25x's DRI (10,000 IU/day) was demonstrated in nonpregnant adults. It is essential to determine what dose of vitamin D is required to eliminate hypovitaminosis D during pregnancy and provide the fetus/neonate with adequate vitamin D stores during development and growth, particularly in darkly pigmented individuals. The aim of this research proposal, then, is to determine the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of maternal vitamin D supplementation (as a function of ethnicity and UV exposure) in the prevention of hypovitaminosis D in the pregnant mother and her fetus/neonate. We hypothesize that darkly pigmented mothers will require substantially higher oral supplementation with vitamin D to eliminate hypovitaminosis D as compared to their Caucasian counterparts. We propose a comprehensive clinical trial to test our hypothesis. Mothers at 12 weeks' gestation will be randomized to one of three vitamin D treatment groups:

  1. Control, 400-,
  2. 2,000-, or
  3. 4,000 IU/day to be continued throughout pregnancy.

Calcium and vitamin D homeostasis and skeletal remodeling in the mother will be monitored closely throughout the pregnancy. Bone density of the mother will be measured at 12 weeks' gestation and one-month postpartum. Follow-up growth and skeletal integrity assessments of the infant will be performed at birth, 1, 6 and 12 months stratified by infant feeding regime. Through these proposed studies, the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among mothers, their developing fetuses and neonates, and the utility of maternal therapeutic intervention with vitamin D for both mother and fetus/infant will be assessed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

501

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 45 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Women who are within the ages of 16-45 years
  2. In good general health
  3. Less than 12 weeks pregnant (based on last menstrual period)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Mothers with preexisting type I or type II diabetes
  2. Mothers with preexisting hypertension
  3. Mothers with preexisting parathyroid disease or uncontrolled thyroid disease
  4. Mothers with multiple fetuses (e.g., twins, triplets, etc.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: cholecalciferol-400 IU
Control group receiving 400 IU/day plus 0 IU vitamin D3 as placebo/day
randomized control trial of three vitamin D doses: 400, 2000 and 4000 IU/day
comparing vitamin D requirements of pregnant women and their fetuses from 12 weeks' gestation through pregnancy
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3
Experimental: cholecalciferol 2000 IU
Experimental group receiving 2000 IU total vitamin D3/day.
randomized control trial of three vitamin D doses: 400, 2000 and 4000 IU/day
comparing vitamin D requirements of pregnant women and their fetuses from 12 weeks' gestation through pregnancy
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3
Experimental: cholecalciferol 4000 IU
Experimental group receiving 4000 IU/day cholecalciferol
randomized control trial of three vitamin D doses: 400, 2000 and 4000 IU/day
comparing vitamin D requirements of pregnant women and their fetuses from 12 weeks' gestation through pregnancy
Other Names:
  • vitamin D3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentration
Time Frame: 7 months
Circulating total 25(OH)D concentration measured in serum at visit 7, one month prior to delivery
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruce W. Hollis, Ph.D., Medical University of South Carolina
  • Principal Investigator: Carol L. Wagner, M.D., Medical University of South Carolina
  • Study Director: Donna Johnson, M.D., Medical University of South Carolina
  • Study Chair: Thomas C. Hulsey, Sc.D., Medical University of South Carolina

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe